Author

Topic: During the fork, what version was blockchain.info on? (Read 942 times)

newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Still no Joy  Huh

Sent a support email...
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0

Second problem my total prior was 490+btc now it is .45+? And strangely the total will increase at random intervals , but when I attempt to withdraw it gives me an error message "insufficient funds" I have a screen shot if that helps?

Thanks again...



Cheers

How about the second issue? Or will it sort itself?

I think that you need to shutdown your client and then run bitcoind -rescan.  The rescan tells it to look for all transactions involving your wallet addresses starting at block 1 - all transactions, that is, that in the MAIN chain.  And that changed last night, which is probably why your client doesn't have the correct balances.  450 btc seems like a lot though, so I'm not sure.  It's worth a try.  On my laptop, the rescan took about 5 minutes.  Once it's done, you can restart your client.

Cheers mate

Will give it a go and report (hopefully successful) back.
sr. member
Activity: 444
Merit: 250
I prefer evolution to revolution.

Second problem my total prior was 490+btc now it is .45+? And strangely the total will increase at random intervals , but when I attempt to withdraw it gives me an error message "insufficient funds" I have a screen shot if that helps?

Thanks again...



Cheers

How about the second issue? Or will it sort itself?

I think that you need to shutdown your client and then run bitcoind -rescan.  The rescan tells it to look for all transactions involving your wallet addresses starting at block 1 - all transactions, that is, that in the MAIN chain.  And that changed last night, which is probably why your client doesn't have the correct balances.  450 btc seems like a lot though, so I'm not sure.  It's worth a try.  On my laptop, the rescan took about 5 minutes.  Once it's done, you can restart your client.
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0

Hey Ben

Is there an issue with transactions not confirming? They were confirmed prior to the fork, but after the recent transactions are showing unconfirmed? Anyone else?

If the transaction was confirmed in the now orphaned 0.8 chain it should go back into the memory pool and be included in the 0.7 chain again eventually. If you let me know the tx hash I can take a closer look.

Cheers Ben

All these addresses have been affected.

12U63dueaNH1ANWLe2XWF6uUqNnstyNi6c

138bqSSnWz23fNHe6qUHRz8LfieqVmvkYr

149PQjaoTXLBkcX5wczcs947zcUbgTUdxp

Second problem my total prior was 490+btc now it is .45+? And strangely the total will increase at random intervals , but when I attempt to withdraw it gives me an error message "insufficient funds" I have a screen shot if that helps?

Thanks again...



Cheers

How about the second issue? Or will it sort itself?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Hey Ben any joy getting my problems fixed? I still have the majority of transactions unconfirmed and the coin total is still .4?

Other than rebroadcast the transaction again there isn't any blockchain can do to speed up confirmations. I am not sure why they are not confirming. I may have something to do with mining pools deprioritizing staoshidice transactions.
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Hey Ben any joy getting my problems fixed? I still have the majority of transactions unconfirmed and the coin total is still .4?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Check this one:

a691ec7271c69f1d387296778c3928bb6cb07f75cc7054ae3eff048a08cdce10

I can't see any reason why that transaction wouldn't confirm.

I suspect during the whole forking crisis a lot of miners nodes were restarted causing them to drop all transactions in their memory pools so perhaps it just needs rebroadcasting (which I have done now).
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 250
Check this one:

a691ec7271c69f1d387296778c3928bb6cb07f75cc7054ae3eff048a08cdce10
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0

Hey Ben

Is there an issue with transactions not confirming? They were confirmed prior to the fork, but after the recent transactions are showing unconfirmed? Anyone else?

If the transaction was confirmed in the now orphaned 0.8 chain it should go back into the memory pool and be included in the 0.7 chain again eventually. If you let me know the tx hash I can take a closer look.

Cheers Ben

All these addresses have been affected.

12U63dueaNH1ANWLe2XWF6uUqNnstyNi6c

138bqSSnWz23fNHe6qUHRz8LfieqVmvkYr

149PQjaoTXLBkcX5wczcs947zcUbgTUdxp

Second problem my total prior was 490+btc now it is .45+? And strangely the total will increase at random intervals , but when I attempt to withdraw it gives me an error message "insufficient funds" I have a screen shot if that helps?

Thanks again...














]

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Need the tx hashes.
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 250
Same here. Two transactions that were showing many confirmations more than 12 hours ago are now unconfirmed.

One of them shows "Included In Blocks   225444 (2013-03-12 01:07:00 +21 minutes) ". That block must have been on the 0.8 blockchain.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005

Hey Ben

Is there an issue with transactions not confirming? They were confirmed prior to the fork, but after the recent transactions are showing unconfirmed? Anyone else?

If the transaction was confirmed in the now orphaned 0.8 chain it should go back into the memory pool and be included in the 0.7 chain again eventually. If you let me know the tx hash I can take a closer look.
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0

Hey Ben

Is there an issue with transactions not confirming? They were confirmed prior to the fork, but after the recent transactions are showing unconfirmed? Anyone else?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1005
Blockchain uses a 0.7 based client so it was on "stuck" on 0.7 chain to begin with. But I altered bitcoind to accept the 0.8 blocks about an hour after so it switched to the 0.8 chain for a while, then back to 0.7 when it caught up.
sr. member
Activity: 444
Merit: 250
I prefer evolution to revolution.
Maybe not a good question.  The list of blocks shows which are in the "real" chain and which are in the fork.
sr. member
Activity: 444
Merit: 250
I prefer evolution to revolution.
...and did they switch from .8 to .7 during the fork?
Jump to: