When bounty managers must handle hundreds of participants, they get lazy. They compromise. They think to themselves, "I'll be paid regardless of whether I check eligibility or not," thus they just won't.
If you are being paid something for a task, you'd better do it, and do it well. If they're treating it like a job, then they should put in the hours. You can't be expected to pop in an hour a week and be done with it.
Topic: Duty of a bounty Manager? (Read 194 times)
This shows how lazy that bounty manager is 
Definitely he is the responsible for all the works so if is not handling it well then it will be the disadvantage for that team who trusted him and gave opportunity to manage their bounty so now you can contact that bounty team and explain this,that s what we can do.
Definitely he is the responsible for all the works so if is not handling it well then it will be the disadvantage for that team who trusted him and gave opportunity to manage their bounty so now you can contact that bounty team and explain this,that s what we can do.
What is the duty of a bounty manager? Is he/she responsible to check the application? Should he/she accept all application without checking? Should he give stakes all accepted participants without checking their task?
I noticed this bounty manager accepting application and giving stakes without checking their task on the Bounty Campaign.
Signature Campaign:
Rules
Sheet
Accepted participant list who should not deserve the rewards:
All bounty post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ebenolus-1184077 received stakes on week 4
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluemeadows-1751388
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/paha87-1823278 received stakes on week 3,4,5,6
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/anandjsingh-1551970 received stakes on week 4,5
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/johnabrar-2071955 received stakes on week ,5,6
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dbravo-2052176 received stakes on week ,5,6
ANd many more. More than 50% stakes given without checking their task.
Telegram Campaign:
Total member 1532 right now. Accepted application 2100+ few not accepted of them but accepted will be more than 2000+ How it is possible?
I think there are more abuse like this.
Who is responsible for it?
I noticed this bounty manager accepting application and giving stakes without checking their task on the Bounty Campaign.
Signature Campaign:
Rules
Sheet
Accepted participant list who should not deserve the rewards:
All bounty post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ebenolus-1184077 received stakes on week 4
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bluemeadows-1751388
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/paha87-1823278 received stakes on week 3,4,5,6
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/anandjsingh-1551970 received stakes on week 4,5
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/johnabrar-2071955 received stakes on week ,5,6
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dbravo-2052176 received stakes on week ,5,6
ANd many more. More than 50% stakes given without checking their task.
Telegram Campaign:
Total member 1532 right now. Accepted application 2100+ few not accepted of them but accepted will be more than 2000+ How it is possible?
I think there are more abuse like this.
Who is responsible for it?
Jump to: