What happened:: Bounty Ended And the team Probably left the project
~
...
Few information about them:
Website: https://assetsplit.org not working
Whitepaper: https://assetsplit.org/assetsplit-whitepaper.pdf not working
Team: they have not published on bitcointalk as website not working can't see either there was any or not.
...
~
...
Few information about them:
Website: https://assetsplit.org not working
Whitepaper: https://assetsplit.org/assetsplit-whitepaper.pdf not working
Team: they have not published on bitcointalk as website not working can't see either there was any or not.
...
Did someone check their team and whitepaper? Someone did, but never got a real answer.
Since there is no archive of their website and whitepaper, it is hard to find out if they had a fake team or a plagiarized whitepaper, which would be the first sign of a possible scam.
We found their team images posted on this website. But due to the small size/resolution, it will be difficult to prove if those images are real or not. Also note that there are no links to a profile.
(images also found here: https://cryptocoinpravda.com/asset-split-ico.html) -archive
someone posted a larger image of a team member here (taken from a screen?
)The text on this website about them is plagiarized from many sources, here is one of them:
https://medium.com/coinmonks/https-medium-com-ritesh-modi-solidity-chapter1-63dfaff08a11
Maybe Bounty Managers before accepting the job should always archive everything - whitepaper, website, etc...
How do we know if the BM, in this case, did his due-diligence? There is not evidence of anything - all deleted.
Should the BM be accounted for this? If the BM doesnt have any evidence that proper research was done before accepting the job of promoting a project that ended scamming participants/investors, we believe this person should be somewhat responsible and this person trust should be affected.
