Hmm??? Well that was a weird offshoot but I'll play this line
Yes we should allow people to access it as long as their are no children exploited for it.
How you ask well modeling works and fashion shows heck even an idol group
The New Zealand model vs Nordic Model if you want to get into the nitty gritty of prostitution in general and the difference of it occurring in the shadows away from the police increasing the risks associated with it or allowing it and having areas where it can occur to throw in wrenches.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/sex-workers-like-new-zealand-law-not-canada-s-new-nordic-model-for-prostitution-1.2665431
Now waits for Phin to come in here and attack
PS: CP is like Crying Terrorism in a discussion so rather than being OH NO we should be censored and be put under mass surveillance because of a few individuals instead of trusting people.
I'll add two wrenches CP was made illegal by Western moralists around 1999 before that it went around just fine, in the 1800's 14 was the age of marriage death 35 so blame an aging population and longer life expectancy towards these new perspectives on this issue.
And to throw a wrench at a Terrorism argument for privacy censoring
American's had 9/11 and in return they recieved the PATRIOT ACT out of that and now they want more powers to continue building up surveillance not just for us but for our children and their generation.
Before that you could travel with big luggage and not be worried about getting on a plane, you could even see off your family up to the airplane.
Things change but that doesn't mean that the old system didn't work most of the time if not all of the time, or that terrorists don't still try to find ways to bypass the system so it's all relative.
This one comes with a video for Net Neutrality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-xSP_T0VqU
I'll play devils advocate and let the battle continue for privacy.