Eh, I should know the answer to this...but I need help.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: DdmrDdmr on September 01, 2022, 12:14:21 AM

Bear in mind that the stat does not necessarily reflect that you merited banned accounts at the time when you merited them, since they could have been banned afterwards.

Yes, yes, a thousand times yes, my hypercortical number cruncher! I appreciate the answer--it was exactly what I was looking for, though if I'd given the whole thing about 20 minutes of thought I probably would have arrived at the answer. I'm very aware that naim027 is appealing his ban and also that I was helping him rank up. My initial thought was that it was a member who'd recently requested a post history review, and I'm relieved that it isn't.

All right, I think that'll do it for this thread. I'mma lock this bizotch up like the storage locker I used to live in and my thanks to you again. I would merit you if I could.

<>

DdmrDdmr

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 10802

There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain

I recently performed this same exercise for another account. This is the data for your current 56 sMerits awarded to banned accounts on that stat:

Code:

amount user_from user_to name url converted_date msg
2 487418 814560 mia_houston https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=814560 2022-05-25 21:02:09.000 1877785.msg60175536
2 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-05-16 00:48:50.000 5397275.msg60127589
4 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-05-16 00:48:28.000 5398408.msg60129414
10 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-05-16 00:48:12.000 1926895.msg60129864
8 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-05-16 00:47:37.000 5277099.msg60130107
6 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-05-08 03:26:15.000 5390389.msg60070575
10 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-05-03 23:00:31.000 5390389.msg59883951
4 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-04-24 10:40:16.000 5393028.msg59767526
6 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-04-18 21:18:48.000 5390704.msg59883604
4 487418 1187984 naim027 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984 2022-03-21 20:25:02.000 5387986.msg59416382

Bear in mind that the stat does not necessarily reflect that you merited banned accounts at the time when you merited them, since they could have been banned afterwards.

The stat really reflects, out of all those sMerits you awarded over the last 180 days, those that were given to accounts that were then or are now banned.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

I'm tellin' you, my peeps, ever since I started that thread with my rules for requesting post history reviews, I haven't been able to keep up! But that's made me curious about merit statistics, which I never really gave much thought to in the past. Recently I saw this and was chagrined to the wind:

Here's my issue: I visited BPIP and Ninjatastic Space looking for who the banned members are that I merited, and if that info exists on either of those sites, I'm totally missing it. But I know for damn sure there are bigger brains than mine in these parts, and I'd like to tickle said brains for an answer.

The problem is that I've browsed a number of people's post histories without giving a single merit, and I'm generally careful about handing out merits to newbies unless I'm sure there's no plagiarism involved--I even reported one of my requestees for plagiarizing something, but I can't remember if I'd already given him a merit or two. I don't think so, but that still wouldn't account for me being at the top of that ignominious list.

And yeah, I get that it's data for the last 180 days, but still.

Thanks in advance, you big-brained brethren....and sistren.

Topic: Eh, I should know the answer to this...but I need help. (Read 153 times)