I’m slightly confused. Not long ago, Athena claimed to be working towards installing 1.500 bitcoin ATMs in El Salvador (see
https://www.reuters.com/technology/athena-says-will-install-1500-cryptocurrency-atms-el-salvador-2021-06-25/), and the headlines today talks about 200 (which I believe are supplied by Athena). Perhaps it’s the initial roll-out, which will be expanded over time to those 1.500 bitcoin ATMs. We’ll see.
This article (in Spanish), claiming to be acting as a sort of "
ChivoLeaks", displays an alleged image of the Chivo Wallet’s architecture:
The article is not too sure on the veracity of the above, being the source attributed to El Tapudo (
https://twitter.com/eltapudosv/status/1429870227899174912), who is apparently a comedian that opposed the Bitcoin Law there. No detail explanation either, but note that it references the Lightning Network. As mentioned, we need to take this with a grain of salt.
Is this Bitcoin ATMs regulated or monitored because I know that most Bitcoin ATMs don't have any way to track the people that use them so is it going to be different? <…>
Here I’m referencing a document (in Spanish) I found, with technical rules to facilitate the implementation of the Bitcoin Law:
https://www.bcr.gob.sv/regulaciones/upload/Normas_Tecnicas_para_Facilitar_la_Aplicacion_de_la_Ley_Bitcoin.pdfThe document was released a week ago, and if valid, it states on page 12, article 27 that (translated):
The ATM must be programmed to ask the user for his/her secret password (PIN), or use an alternative identification method, before initializing the session.
It does not explicitly mention Chivo (or else), and to add a bit more confusion, the article comes under a section called "ATM from bitcoin to dollars and vice-versa".
Leaving ATMs aside, the article, which I’ve only skimmed through, does place a lot of focus on AML, GAFI recommendations and so forth. Page 21 article 51 for example talks about entities needing to retain and forward information on TX sender, receiver, amounts, etc. Perhaps it only applies to TXs over 1K $ (explicitly mentioned in article 50).
Here I’m confused (yet again) as to the scope. It references financial institutions, but I’d really like to properly understand whether this all applies to Chivo (which I suspect it does), and what will happen if someone wants to make a purchase in a store from their own non-Chivo wallet for quantities both below and above 1K.
All in all, the more I read, the more confused I get, so I either stop reading, or I need to read through the references 20 times to try grasp the proper content. I’m more lenient to the former, and I’ll await the roll-out to read through the experience/issues/limitations/controls then …
Edit: This came to mind: