No knowledgeable person will expect renewable energy to be totally green because whatever has an advantage must also have a disadvantage that's what it is but what I am saying is that it reduce the level of hydrocarbon injected into the atmosphere.
It is certainly not green if you're in a country with some dependency on fossil fuels. There is a net gain in carbon footprint, especially if you are incurring opportunity costs by allocating more renewable energy to Bitcoin mining, which means there would be an increase dependence on fossil fuel. Renewable energy facilities are more expensive to build, and claiming that it is cheaper usually comes with the premise that the general population are subsidizing it to a certain extent.
Yes, their community won't improve through the legalization of Bitcoin if the people don't improve themselves and also make use of every new opportunity that the Bitcoin legalization introduced to them. However, those who are smart will make something out of it.
Mandating businesses to accept Bitcoin does nothing to improve their lives. The recognition of it as a legal tender doesn't do anything for the citizens, because their currency is denominated in USD which is far, far more stable than Bitcoin. The price of it doesn't drop by 10% in a matter of hours.
The president may not do anything by legalizing Bitcoin but it showcases the country to the world and people said advertisement is powerful.
It doesn't. Legalizing Bitcoin doesn't solve the inherent issues that they're facing. North Korea can do the same, but the country will still be rife with poverty and corruption.
I don't like politics and neither did I support corrupted leaders but it is not easy to eliminate when the foundation of politics was built on corruption. An example. Do you hear about some new US presidential elections vote that was detected recently?
Satoshi understands this which is the reason why he/she created something decentralized.
No. Corruption has no place in politics, neither is dictatorship. The fact that someone is able to game the system, by amending the constitution to give themselves more power or installing politicians who are known to be corrupted isn't a common place in politics. Accepting Bitcoin isn't the first step in the right direction, the right thing to do is to solve the domestic issues and not try to create more positive PR for his cause and consolidate even more power.
The fact that any politician in the world can declare that they're a 'dictator' is disgusting. It sets a precedent that should never happen in the society that we have today. Again, Bitcoin does nothing to change that. Accepting Bitcoin as a legal tender DID NOT help his country with their poverty or corruption.
Point is, no matter how much you support Bitcoin, don't negate the larger issue at hand. It is nothing but a distraction from the larger issue at hand.