Topic: Entrust or distrust for this? (Read 665 times)

"Thermos" and his friends may join Ross Ulbricht very soon. Bitconnect creators disappeared and nobody can find them. Where are they? I don't know, but believe me, it was better for them to go to Police themselves instead of beeng where they are now. New website is coming shortly where all names and details will be explained.  

Hey TMAN,

How's life on lockdown? Are you taking this time to shine the training-wheels on your "BITCH-mobile"

I ended up following the trail of those prize specimins of Chinese humanity over at the BitcoinVideoCasino.com, with the help of a professional cyberecurity buddy of mine -- you do know what "buddies" are, right???

Turns out that BitcoinVideoCasino.com is cloaked in more layers of security than the secret room where Prince Andrew stores his women's shoe photo collection. Lo and behold, we have managed to crack a FEW layers of the safe to find that INDEED they're operating out of #China - probably in cohoots with that other sociopath, Justin Sun. Actually, they list "Hong Kong" on the phantom hosting site which supposedly hosts BitcoinVideoCasino :

http://www.serioustubes.network

but it's impossible to contact them via email to file abuse reports. So we're now taking it directly to Amazon Web Service.

The bottom line is that even though you're a BITCH-wannabee, and TURD-smith of the highest order, my original claim that BitcoinVideoCasino.com is a complete scam is only proving more and more true the further I look into this (which has become more of an "problem solving hobby" than anything else at this point.

Anyways, I hope you are THRIVING i your effort to graduate from "wannabee bitch" to "proper bitch", and you also put the finishing touches on your new book "How To be A Bitch And Influence People".

And go ahead and give me another one of your PUNY demerits. You're still one (distrust point) UP from me, and we all know how bad that itches you.

Smell ya' later...

BEEEEE-Atch!

#Trump2020!

It is good to see that TMAN removed the trust abuse.
Although tmans still insists it was appropriate.

This is still sufficient reason to distrust his judgement.
Clearly others insisting that those devaluing the trust system on multiple occasions should be included are also dubious.

Recent red tags are usually an acceptance there is no objective evidence of scamming on your account.

Lauds seems to be wrong as usual. Red tags were specifically for scammers or those you could demonstrate were strongly likely to scam.

TMAN is clearly just an idiot who has previously auction scammed / attempted to scam people as documented by OGnasty. Having this type of individual as part of any trust system is ridiculous.

Removing tman would be better than nothing, but long term achieves nothing. TMAN may have a ton of alts and could be powered up with merit by his friends ( as previously happened with his 100's of merits his pals donated to him over a very short period, to boost him from hero to legend).

You wish to prevent future abuse like this by TMAN and others like him, then you need to see tagging abolished. A a move to the flagging system that is based upon objective standards of evidence is the only way.

Suchmoon has a thread in meta that I started for him where he will help me demonstrate this is the best solution. When / if he arrives. Taking a long time to present his argument.

So yes, distrust tman's judgement and abuse of the trust system (and for trying to auction scam of he members) for sure, but removal of the subjective and abuse tagging system is the only long term fix.

There are other strong reasons to distrust TMAN that have been raised many times.

TMAN also lied about sodomizing numerous members parents and poiling their soft furnishings. Those claims may seem obviously ridiculous and should clearly be taken as a joke. TMAN clearly does not agree and has previously used such situations to red trust others for lying.

Distrust 100%  anyone including him on DT is dubious.

now young man. I normally charge for swearing lessons - but ill do this one for free as you really need some fucking help here nobcheese.

lets dissect.
Yeah tampon sucker, smelly onionhead - really? tampon sucker and smelly onionhead? fucking hell thats poor, who/what is an onionhead.

if you ever run out of licking your own girls wet tampons then don't hesitate to PM me with your postal address - ok so what are you some used tampon collector? how many do you fucking have weirdo

I will FedEx you with loads of used wet tampons of the girls I sleep with in every weekend - so average age of these tampons please, details needed..  you really do have a fetish for bloodsports, every weekend? do you go out hunting for menstruating females only and just collect their tampons, or are you a stalker with some app or something that tells you when its bloodweek?

I can even provide you any specific race you want - 110M hurdles and the 100M sprint are my favorites.

I sleep with all sorts of girls - what is this? R/IHAVESEX  ?

Also if any of your girl is not satisfied with their sexual life and needs real orgasm then you can talk to me. - said by the most typical of neckbeard virgins

I can play with them to make them squirt and they will never ask for a another man. - Please can we have some testimonials from previous victims.

anyway now you have proven to be a virgin I have a whole host of new insults and nicknames

ok Hymen?

xxxx

I wasnt online much over the weekend, I don't allow insignificant fools like yourself or TS to occupy my headspace, so I would not change my lifestyle to come on and post about all this.

anyway fucko - its done, move on - change your tampon shitcunt.

Quote

But, I am always willing to those who have an opinion I respect

I really do not see you to show a little respect to others. It was the pressure that was created to you which led you to remove the tag.
You get that you give. See how I response to you now?

you condescending bedwetting fuck piss off

No I do not believe It was inappropriate to tag the dickcheese TS. But, I am always willing to those who have an opinion I respect and I am not so far up my own arse that I wont admit that my view could be incorrect, I could be acting emotionally, maybe allowing my own judgement to be clouded!

laters anyway cunt 1/2/3 in this thread. xxxx

Good thing that you are learning. Also good for me that I did not listen to your behave lecture here.
Besides, one does not have to be a trader with trading history to leave correct feedback for others. A good trader with long trading history can also leave a wrong feedback.

Sounds like you still do not think it was inappropriate, sad but at least you are learning.

removed the Neg - cant be arsed with this drama.

TS is a cuntsmouth

sidechain.. grow up ya spaznozzle

It does not sound funny to me too. This is serious subject and can we say the following users are liable for this kind of power to give someone who do not worth it?

Vod
anduck
monkeynuts
yogg
hybridsole
greenplastic
Avirunes
owlcatz
nutildah
dazedfool
BitcoinPenny
LFC_Bitcoin
The Pharmacist
asu
Jet Cash
bL4nkcode
finaleshot2016
xtraelv
crwth
krogothmanhattan
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
sheenshane
lovesmyfamilis
TalkStar
DIKUL

These are the users who are still entrusting TMAN.
May be this people are not aware about the recent issue raised here againt TMAN. Can anyone PM these users to get their attention here so that they notice it. Keep this in mind that if one person wants to send PM to all users then s/he might have a chance to get ban. Two or more users can share the task of sending PMs if needed.

What if even after seeing all these misuse from TMAN some of these people continue supporting him? Shall we go and start excluding them from the trust list too?
Those who support the crime are equal guilty.

"does Theymos need the cybercrimes unit hitting him up? do you need your local police knocking on your door?"

""you raped me as a young girl" - "TS., and his friend mr hillarious cunt. sexual predators together MR FBI""



How about these parts where he accuses TS and a forum moderator of rape and threatens to report them to the FBI/Law Enforcement/Cybercrimes unit etc?

Doesn't sound like funny jokes to me..

I think you are delusional and spreading false information. Negative trust incoming. That was easy.

One doesn't necessarily have to be a scammer or a rule breaker to be tagged. The trust system can be applied in a variety of situations and is meant to serve as a pointer or suggestion to guide those who would interact with that account.

A user can be tagged for being delusional and spreading false information. A user can also be tagged for an attempt at impersonating another user. A hacked account can (should) as well be tagged
Any situation where you feel a remark about a member should be left to give the general forum an idea about the individual, a tag can be used (positive, neutral or negative)

Sorry, I was more pertaining that nobody should attack him (not planned to claim that you were) or anyone else for these matters.

It's a thin line: On one hand he wants to have less authority, on the other hand, we could theoretically evolve consensus (i.e. almost all DT1 members) that we can and should tag people for something very stupid e.g. claiming the Earth is flat. There are no fixed rules in this system, unless he wants to return to his role of the Emperor - this is what makes action require great consideration and caution!

I have nothing against TMAN and I am not attacking him, I am just saying what's my opinion with regards to this issue. And I am just saying what's trust system should be to Theymo's point of view. I understand your point with regards to different way to perceive the trust system, and I respect that. Maybe TMAN's way is right considering that, lot of DT's are trusting his judgement.


I agree, For scammers and for forum rule breakers  (For me)

Sometimes I like what TMAN does and says, when he is drunk. "Va---di---yo---mo----pi"......
Sometimes makes me piss-in-pants-funny, if I see the words, full of humor_love.

if there are rules of choice here, every DT has to tag someone, I will vote (disagree) in the case of TECSHARE.
From the words of TMAN when judged in this case it seems he prefers to ignore what happened to TECSHARE.

But at least TMAN is a good mother to consider this issue, be a good choice.

You are seeing one mistake?

---

I have done some review on the feedback left by this user, not all but first few from the first page of his sent feedback page.

Feedback left for truth or dare
Left negative for raising voice.

Feedback left for iobet.io
Red tag for what reason? Shut the mouth?

Feedback left for N0sferatu
Red trust is not to use for personal defense too.

Whilst I am not going to comment on this ordeal included in the OP (people fighting is very tiring), I ask you to stop repeating this false statement. Red trust is not only for scammers, never has been and never will be.

See the bolded part. While you may not think so, someone else may think so. We should not attack people for fundamental differences in how they perceieve trust. If you really disagree with it, talk to them. If you can't come to a common ground, exclude from your trust view if it is worth that much to you. But the stark attacking of each other needs to stop. What was the point of turning the trust system into a democracy-style system otherwise?

I respect TMAN and can't distrust him just because he make a one mistake using the trust system, we should consider what he do to the forum and not only see the few bad decision he make, but I will say that this is not a correct usage of the trust system.

Theymos said that:

Red tagging is for scammers only, or if you see a valid a evidence if that person is going to scam anyone. Nobody should be tagged for personal opinion. If you hate that person's opinion you can ignore him or just make a neutral feedback about him,


I don't believe that TECSHARE is likely to scam anyone, or trading with him is high-risk since we have a trade at the past. This kind of tag is not acceptable since it's more like a personal thing. Tagging people just because you didn't like him is not acceptable at all.

---

Just let's wait for TMAN's answer for this, and hoping he would delete this kind of feedback.

Agreed!

I read TMAN was getting drunk a while before I saw that feedback. I don't know the exact timeline, but if this is related, it's not how feedback should be used.

@OP: Why are you posting 3 weeks old data? This is the latest version:

Yeah, I'd say that feedback is uncalled for.  At best it should be a neutral, but it's trust page trolling anyway and certainly should not be a negative. 

TECSHARE might be aggressive but I don't think he rises to the level of a cyberbully--and most of us are always preaching how members should grow a thicker skin anyway, so I don't think he's deserving of a neg for that.  Hopefully TMAN will reevaluate that neg, but we'll see.