https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/cboebzx/2018/34-83520.pdf
The SEC's page is accepting comments on the new ETF proposal. This time ordered by the Van Fund. But so far, the comments are Derp. They're just making the proposal look stupid. In fact, it leaves the impression that the whole community is.
Please, if you believe you are able to convince the SEC to accept the ETF proposal leave a constructive and well-grounded comment demonstrating a view that perhaps no one else has about Bitcoin technology.
It is very simple, fast and they even accept anonymous comments.
The SEC's page is accepting comments on the new ETF proposal. This time ordered by the Van Fund. But so far, the comments are Derp. They're just making the proposal look stupid. In fact, it leaves the impression that the whole community is.
Please, if you believe you are able to convince the SEC to accept the ETF proposal leave a constructive and well-grounded comment demonstrating a view that perhaps no one else has about Bitcoin technology.
It is very simple, fast and they even accept anonymous comments.
Quote
2. E-mail
Send comments to [email protected].
The subject line of your message must include the File Number for the rule. This is the number that begins “S7-” or “SR-”.
If you attach a document, indicate the format or software used (e.g., PDF, Word Perfect, MS Word, ASCII text, etc.) to create the attachment.
Please note that we now accept comment letters in PDF format.
DO NOT submit attachments as HTML, GIF, TIFF, PIF, ZIP, or EXE.
Send comments to [email protected].
The subject line of your message must include the File Number for the rule. This is the number that begins “S7-” or “SR-”.
If you attach a document, indicate the format or software used (e.g., PDF, Word Perfect, MS Word, ASCII text, etc.) to create the attachment.
Please note that we now accept comment letters in PDF format.
DO NOT submit attachments as HTML, GIF, TIFF, PIF, ZIP, or EXE.
why should the high risk averse pension funds support the bitcoin cult and its risky unbacked cryptocurrency?
What is the significance of your comment?? Does it even related to the OP? Your comments is not making any sense with respect to the thread content. Or am I not able to understnd your hidden meaning?
Quote
The subject line of your message must include the File Number for the rule. This is the number that begins “S7-” or “SR-”.
OP, can you please elaborate this matter? I am willing to share comments to SEC but what does that file number for the rule means?? Can you please explain for my better understanding?
