Topic: Ethical to self delete "hanging in the air" Posts [Time to call theymos?] (Read 299 times)

That's why I didn't say anything else to them. I gave them a lot of time after coming to the forum and tried to understand it well. The suspicious tag they gave me was not right at all. I requested to remove it but they said they would revise it but would not delete the tag. I had bookmarked the forum rules very nicely on my laptop and understood them after a lot of time. They suspected that my journey was a little fast, this cannot be considered a matter of doubt. They thought it was suspicious, then I told everything very fairly.

However, if they don't remove their tag even after I told them the whole story, then they have nothing more to say. Because there is no way to compare me with anyone else. Since you are also in the forum and I am also there, keep watching my activities. The main thing is that they suspected that I am moving forward so quickly, this is nothing else but the main reason for suspicion. It doesn't take much time to move forward in the forum if you pay a little attention and look at the rules carefully.

The same users that digressed the former thread that led to hanging posts are here again. Now, remaining a mod to come delete some posts and hang some more lol. Here is meta board, if there's any lingering issues, open a thread in reputation and sort it out there.

@worldofcoins, lock this thread if your issue has been resolved otherwise this troll and an alt of someone I replied to on your thread, who again I believe an alt of a higher account will continue to spam it. Chill! Wonder Work aka Tiger Fist and please stop abusing everyone who does not agree with your point and your understanding.  

Let's wait for a few 'Bang. Gang' members I mentioned in the suspected alt list before we proceed |Tiger fist, Wonder work are here |, mates, and be safe from crocodiles and snakes. There are a lot where I live. And bring a "motor boat"; Little Mouse didn't need it to be saved from the flood, but you will.
2nd suggestion: Get your passport approved.

You may know how I was suspected. I was suspected in such a way that it seems like it is an alt account, so they gave me a neutral tag. If I check your account like that and say I think you are alt account, then tell me how it happened. That way, I was told an alt account without any proper proof. Where there is false suspicion, I can also say that you are an alt. Where there is no proof but it seems like something like that.

Then imagine if someone came and said that it seems like it is an alt account. And thinking this, they came and gave a tag, then how did the matter happen. Something like that happened to me that you know well and understand.

Hello sir. I want to do your phycology class. How much do you charge for a session? Please let me know.

How did you escaped the mental hospital? I loved how you sucked a managers dick and got accepted in signature campaign even though you were job less for months. You are already abusing the campaign by joining with your alternative account.

Again, DM me your address and i will meet you pajeet.

@pakhitheboss, You are alt account of father of trolls, JollyGood. No proof needed. Anyone can see that if they reveiw the posting patterns and habits of tagging and accusing people out of thin air.

All I can say is that the pizza you baked for the contest looked good, as far as the JG and Pak tags go, who am I to tell them who should they trust personally, send feedbacks, there are more reputable members, I am sure you made that request to, did they heed is all you should keep in mind and move on.
What did you know about the forum, rules, etc, and where to navigate it? It was way too quick for a new user.

I was expecting proof but it seems you are ignoring me as you wrote a reply and never quoted one of mine. I am disappointed and I am eagerly waiting for a piece of concrete evidence.  

EDIT:

How did I defame you? I gave you a neutral tag that does not concern BMs except one. I am not even bothered here because you will get into another signature campaign if the BM thinks you are eligible. You are here for money and you have alts which you are using to defame me. You have questioned me about being an alt that is why I asked you to prove it. Posting my history as your alt did will not get you anything positive like your DMs. 

I think it is high time I should have posted those screenshots as you are begging me to remove the neutral tag.  ;)Again I will repeat the same my tags do not have influence but JollyGoods will and if he removes his tag I will follow him as per my tag write-up.

You can think whatever you want about them but you may have seen before that JollyGood made a post on the reputation board where I was falsely suspected and tagged with someone else randomly. ‌I have given all my details there, you may have seen it well. ‌ I have no connection, I do not know who they are. If something like this is said about me there, why should I remain silent. My journey is completely different, there is no point in comparing me with them. Why should I be talked about like this when I am not wrong.

Keep an eye on them, if they have done something wrong, discuss their issues but not about me.‌ If something like this is said about me where I have told everything about me nicely, then it is definitely not acceptable. I have already been tagged as JollyGood alt. Pakhitheboss came and tagged me too when he saw JollyGood. I was very surprised to see the issues. But there is nothing to say, I have presented everything nicely to them, yet they falsely slandered me.

Yes, if there is no benefit, then there is no need to do that, but talk about those who are suspicious legally. I don't know those who are not at fault, I don't know who they are, there is no point in trying to reconcile me with them. If you ever find any fault, then definitely talk about it, then I won't say anything.

But I don't know anything about what they did or didn't do. Why should I bear all this blame for them, you ask? That's why I don't know who does what, I am completely fair, I have no fault, so there is no need to waste my time thinking about them. If you ever find anything like that, then definitely tell me. I know you understand my point so thanks.

Why should I defame you? I have no intention of doing anything to defame you. But you have already done everything you can to defame me, brother. I feel good to see that you are very happy defaming me. However, what you are doing is not my intention to do anything in response, but what you are doing is acting outside the rules.

I humbly request you to show an actual reason for proving that I am an alt 

By the way, sharing the same screenshot proves that you were using an alt account to defame me in the same tone and manner. Keep on doing your good work 

I have done proper analytical and psychological research on these people and mentioned the reasons for why I believe something to be the case; I can't help it if you're unable to comprehend it. | It's clear there for anyone with that capability.

I am sure about L. Bitcoin, T. Fist, and others; I am only uncertain about you, that's why i stated it as a possibility (Reason: Not doing enough research on you)

Re. Posting: If I see there can be an organic discussion that can follow, then yes, I will post.
When it comes to teaching others, what do you want me to teach? How do I install a Bitcoin wallet, create a bitcointalk profile, and avoid being traced after committing a crime, yes, I can do that, but what's the point if it's not interesting to me?

He may have DM you about your activity that was revealed yesterday. But the kind of blame you gave him was definitely not right for you. You gave him the blame and you also tagged him, so he checked your account's previous activity. According to that activity, of course you can also be considered an alt, this has been clearly revealed. But having an alt account on the forum is not a mistake if you do not commit any scam or violate the forum rules.

According to your initial activity, anyone will completely believe that it is an alt account. Because alt accounts always come forward by participating in such bounties. And everyone now knows that those who participate in bounty campaigns are maximum alt accounts.

In a post yesterday, I saw that you are being criticized a lot and some examples were given there. I am adding you here as a demo of that, you will see.

However, as long as you keep giving random blame like this on the forum, the more trolls you will become, as some already understood yesterday.

There will be suggestions for you. Do something good. You cannot go far by blaming someone randomly. Therefore, develop a bond of lovelyhood. Treat everyone well, then the next journey will definitely be good.

---

What thoughts do you have, these do not enter my mind. Don't you have anything else good in your mind? Thinking randomly and who do you want to match with whom? Stop these, otherwise you will be constantly subjected to trolls. You have no authority to say anything until you get any proof. I have completely highlighted my personal issues. You have no reason to think about matching me with anyone else here.

I believe 100%, I believe 200%, these are not outside any rules. You believe whatever you want, no one cares. There is no question of wishing here, you have no right proof, no right blame. Coming here, I believe, I do this, I do that, what kind of things are these? The day you can say something as proof, you will speak on the day, and besides, don't try to match me with anyone else.

The forum has not given you any right to match me with anyone else and blame me. There is no need to spread any lies about me. Use your time for good purposes. Are you doing all this to increase your posts because you don't have any other place to post? There are many good places to post help others try to spread knowledge no point in posting random stuff like that.

If you look at my post history in the thread where you were targeted, then you can see I provoked response from “Learn Bitcoin” account but the reaction came from “Tiger Fist” it is very clear when you look at “Save LM” thread, Learn bitcoin was actively blaming a selective media “india”. The same was done by “Tiger Fist”, my quotes of “Moterboat, Flood, Flooded house” seemed to got into his head, got the reaction out.

I will not be surprised if: Learnbitcoin, Wonder work, Tiger fist are same person. |
And I 100% believe: LittleMouse, Scammer(Small Rabbit), and hedgehod are same person. |

Another unbelievable co-incidence to me -> Royse gets the House address and documents of scammer "Small Rabbit" | Learn Bitcoin gets the address of "Little Mouse"
Both mammals somehow have loose hold on their home addresses, documents, and love attention.
- Royse is also involved in both of them, hires naim (Supposedly from bangladesh)

- I will also not be surprised if LM, and Royse, have their own puppets in their own campaign the way we're seeing things here (This is an assumption)

They both have puppets in common, are from Bangladesh, and are most likely Mates/Soul-Mates.

Anyway I will not drag the convo about these 2 3 (Rose) peeps on this thread after this post.

Bro Chill! I did notice that he did abuse in Hindi slang, I reckon he is not active on this forum in any signature campaign after the last neutral tag I added on an account that knows how the forum works. After the brief interaction with the alt account on the thread where I was targeted I received not one but two DMs clarifying his position. It is evident that this user knows Hindi and has disguised himself as someone from the neighboring country. As you wrote it would take a lot of balls for him to come to you in person.

Yes, they will not be focusing on 'a-h-p' for the majority of the threads, but I believe Meta and Reputation's hot threads will be preferred, unless rule specific to it are made, I also remember when i managed "Stressers campaigns." I got a message by theymos stating "stresses have been banned on the forum" and was requested not to promote them/manage their campaign in future"
- Soon after, there was a new rule made on the forum regarding stresses right after mixers. I could be wrong, but I believe this was latest new added rule.

People are less likely to get attention on themselves on these boards for "spamming/offtopic/spreading-bs" because they're watched very closely compared to other boards.


The person cannot even ask for documents from his main account. Do you expect him to visit me himself? These are shallow people with empty threats.

[2] - Yup, that's why the moderator asked; he didn't want to delete the post that wasn't reported. I could've refused if I wanted "giving into ego," but it would've been a bad example of exploiting the place you use. (I am sure some people would've loved me taking that route and setting an example).

I had a look at the archived posts you have provided, and it shows that the guy was abusive and was even threatening you to provide your location, etc. The moderator was right that your posts had no meaning anymore since the posts were responses to the person alone, and his posts had already been removed. Just like others have said, I have never faced such a situation before nor have I seen anyone mentioning it like you did.


As I said above, since your posts didn't contain any content other than responses to the guy and his posts that were already removed, deleting your posts should cause no problems and they serve nothing to the thread itself. If your posts have multiple quotes, or content towards the thread or some other posts that you have responded to, then the mod would probably not ask you to delete the posts, probably.

I've never heard of this happening before, and as to your question here....there's no way in hell the mods are going to be focusing on 'air-hanging posts'.  At least I hope not, because those are trivial compared to the constant avalanches of diarrhea in the form of posts, AI-generated or not, and all the other stuff that shady members pull on an hourly basis.

Also, I could swear that in the past if mods took notice of posts like the one you're referring to, they'd just delete them themselves and the member whose post is flapping in the air wouldn't get a notification via PM, but the offending member would.  Maybe things have changed in the past couple of years and I've not noticed.  Quite possible.

[1] - Yes, it is possible, but it created a laughable scene in that thread when a troll gets rekt for every time he tries to troll, the way it was going in that thread; it's assumable that even IRL, he faces the same treatment. - People were most likely laughing so hard that it might've been inappropriate for many to show it.

[2] - I believe there's a rule that Mods are allowed to take their actions in some cases, and not every thread will head in the same direction as in which I participated did, there are infinite possibilities.

I think you can avoid it by replying to other people posts, not only one user.

If you reply to the @OP, reply to the troll and then reply to other user, such post high unlikely to be deleted. But, the moderator can still ask to delete a part of your post though, honestly I have never experience in this situation.

If I'm  involved in an ongoing conversation in a thread and a troll digresses the conversation, and a mod deleted all the posts of the troll, and keep mine even when I quoted the troll. I would assume that the mod possibly doesn't want me to get furious since I wasn't the one responsible for the off topic. I'll rather see it as an honour and delete the posts rather  than seeing it as a bug or an order from the moderator.

However, people perceive things differently. I have seen where multiple posts were deleted because one or two users digressed the thread, but I haven't seen the situation presented in Op.

Well, the moderators aren't lazy, to be honest, so I got the DM in a brief moment. In short, the reputation board seems to be watched a lot by the moderators.

I cannot imagine this sort of situations happen very often where so many replies are deleted that the thread loses a lot of its context. If you do miss the few times it happened, mods will be on hand to handle it themselves or send a message.

I have never been asked to delete a post, this may be an indication that this situation does not happen often.

- Jay -

Yup, the mod put it respectfully.


Yes, but how can someone keep track of every post a person made quoting a spam/off-topic (deleted), also keeping in mind if there are multiple quoted posts and single one out of all gets deleted for being off-topic/spam. Then how will the person keep noticing this?, In Hot-Topics moderators can be responsible, but how can a handful mods will ask the poster(s) to delete multiple posts.


Glad.

The message from the mod already settles the issue. Mods are encouraged to use their interpretation of the rules as much as possible and to improvise when there are no clear rules. That is what the mod did here by asking you to handle the posts yourself, rather than deleting them and you getting the automated notification.

If you are asking if it is ethical to delete your own posts that have lost their context, it is to me.

You are also not at any risk of plagiarism, you were not claiming the text.

- Jay -

Recently, in beef with user "Tiger Fist," in Thread pakhitheboss bias| Alleged alt of some ranked member, most likely in a campaign.

The user kept taking the thread off-topic, citing me wherever I felt necessary, and I responded. Then, his posts were reported and deleted by the Moderator.

But mine quoting and replying to his weren't for some reason. I can't find any rules regarding "Posts to be self-deleted, in case the quoted Post has been deleted due to off-topic/spam."

So, I got a message from a Mod requesting me to delete the posts for a reason: "Since the posts you commented on in this thread have been deleted for being off-topic, your posts are now left “hanging in the air.” Therefore, they should be deleted." (I am not disclosing the Name of the person, only a partial DM, I hope it won't be counted for plagiarism).

The moderator did the right thing by asking, for there are no rules for such an event, or had there been in the past (I never came across such)

The posts I self-deleted:

[1] - https://ninjastic.space/post/64966230
[2] - https://ninjastic.space/post/64966290

---

Another considerable thought comes to mind: Should the person correcting/answering someone where they're mentioned should be deleting their content?
If this is the case, then how would they avoid it? This will also most likely not apply to every board.