Topic: Ever Heard of Constitutional Carry? (Read 872 times)

My bad if it was.

but yes every military commander in the pacific was afraid of this in fact the battle of midway was where this could have happened. and Russia was on the verge of collapse the only reason they won at Stalingrad was due to the tactic not caring about human lives and just doing human wave tactics.

I think that "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was debunked, but could a coastal invasion force have even made it across the Pacific without being sunk by the US Navy? Or up to Alaska, and fared any better than the Germans when they tried to invade Russia?

But the BIG thing that cops will have to work a lot harder at is, finding a reason to exist. If the law was, that everyone was required to carry, openly, at least a .357 Magnum, when they were off their personal residence, there wouldn't be any need for cops. The bad guys would disappear. There wouldn't be any terrorists.

The idea of the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution went the wrong way. It only allowed that people could bear arms. If it had been required that people ALL bear arms, right from the get-go, we would have almost NO problems in our nation. The few problems that we did have would be a lot different than what is here now.

This law will make cops' work much harder. I've seen a lot of videos on YT with people provoking the police by carrying guns and now every idiot will try to exercise his right to parade with an AR.

Lawmakers in West Virginia are delivering to Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin legislation that will expand access to National Firearms Act-controlled items and grant concealed carry without a permit.

The two measures have tracked through the state legislature by wide margins with the shall-sign measure unanimously approved in both chambers while the proposal to allow permitless concealed carry passed Thursday 79-21 in the state House after the Senate polled 32-2 for it last week.

“We’re here to protect our people from big government,” said Delegate Michael Ihle, R-Jackson, of the carry bill before yesterday’s vote. “This is a step in the right direction. It’s not perfect, but it gets us much closer on the 2nd Amendment to doing what’s right.”
The legislation, SB 347, would repeal language in the current state code that makes it illegal to carry a concealed handgun without a permit.

As long as the individual is legally able to possess a firearm under state and federal laws, they may carry a concealed pistol or revolver for self-defense purposes. This would include carrying while hiking or hunting, or while traveling in a motor vehicle, or in public. However, with or without a permit, carry would still be prohibited on certain public properties such as the state Capitol, courthouses, public schools and colleges.

Currently, the practice outlined in the bill, commonly known as constitutional carry, is the law of the land in Vermont, Arizona, Alaska and Wyoming.

The proposal was panned by the West Virginia Sheriff’s Association, U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin (D), a number of currently sitting mayors in the state, as well as national gun control groups who argued the $100 fee, training and vetting requirements now in place are there for a reason.

“The current license requirements in West Virginia include things like undergoing basic training on how to handle and fire a gun, passing a criminal background check, and other reasonable safeguards,” Dee Price Childress, with the West Virginia chapter of Moms Demand Action, said in a statement. “If a person wants to carry a loaded, concealed handgun in public they should be required to demonstrate they have a clean criminal record and have been trained to carry a gun safely.”