Over 200 users are working with me in this forum....
...and I'm one of them.
I'm the OP for the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III thread...
Wanna Rumble?
Topic: Everybody who work with jamalaezaz with Neg Tag (Read 427 times)
...and I'm one of them.
I'm the OP for the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III thread...
Over 200 users are working with me in this forum....
...and I'm one of them.
I'm the OP for the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III thread...
Wanna Rumble?
Over 200 users are working with me in this forum....
But how could this guy get only neutral trust? Avirunes: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitfinnese-860327
That's not a link to Avirunes.this is an example of unfair trust system again since the only people has been tagged is those little guys but they will shaken off if the guy who do the same work is somehow big in their eyes.
No. It's an example of the exact opposite, i.e. the trust system working as intended. Avirunes does no longer work with that shady user, and I *trust* them enough not to warrant a negative. If he/she does continue working with him (or them), then they'd be a liar and that would warrant a negative from me as well.I think His existing camp with jamal is Utrust which is shady and still not paying their participants eventhough their coins and sale end up for long months ago.
Do you know, what is bounty manager work? Bounty manager work finish after calculating all stakes and provide spreadsheet to ICO team. We can just contact team and pressurize them to send asap. But sometime team delay to send bounty tokens because they fear bounty hunter will dump asap. So they use delay tactics to mature market little bit before sending bounty tokens.
OP is a silly, ignorant troll who has a hard on for criticizing how other people leave feedback. OP is somehow shocked that each user is different and therefore a neg might not apply in all cases. I think OP ought to get out and mingle and spend less time trolling people who are actually doing something to help bitcointalk.
Actually I'm not interested on that bounty payment but I'm interested for the fact that you are the one who's left given a neutral trust by Lauda unlike those poor guys out there who earn the last judgement.
I have explained to his/her personally my case. I've never interfered in his/her opinion while leaving that rating is what you are trying to come up with. I know the Bounty payment is taking too much time but delay is not from our end which you should understand. On a second note we are not processing payouts and are working on sheets only which we have already finished. We just need to update the list with tokens for which we are waiting for Utrust team to provide.
I already have mentioned that so many times in thread myself.
Also I am also updating in the thread about what's the position of Utrust team and right now they have started counting the exact token pool.
If you need a snip of screenshot to prove this up then I will be more than glad to provide those.
I already have mentioned that so many times in thread myself.
Also I am also updating in the thread about what's the position of Utrust team and right now they have started counting the exact token pool.
If you need a snip of screenshot to prove this up then I will be more than glad to provide those.
Actually I'm not interested on that bounty payment but I'm interested for the fact that you are the one who's left given a neutral trust by Lauda unlike those poor guys out there who earn the last judgement.
I know the Bounty payment is taking too much time but delay is not from our end which you should understand. On a second note we are not processing payouts and are working on sheets only which we have already finished. We just need to update the list with tokens for which we are waiting for Utrust team to provide.
I already have mentioned that so many times in thread myself.
Also I am also updating in the thread about what's the position of Utrust team and right now they have started counting the exact token pool.
If you need a snip of screenshot to prove this up then I will be more than glad to provide those.
I already have mentioned that so many times in thread myself.
Also I am also updating in the thread about what's the position of Utrust team and right now they have started counting the exact token pool.
If you need a snip of screenshot to prove this up then I will be more than glad to provide those.
I think His existing camp with jamal is Utrust which is shady and still not paying their participants eventhough their coins and sale end up for long months ago.
While, admittedly, I do not know the situation with that bounty campaign, that is still past work. Especially if it is unfinished, Avirunes can't leave. If there is really something wrong with that campaign, then that would warrant a separate thread with proof (naturally). But how could this guy get only neutral trust? Avirunes: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitfinnese-860327
That's not a link to Avirunes.this is an example of unfair trust system again since the only people has been tagged is those little guys but they will shaken off if the guy who do the same work is somehow big in their eyes.
No. It's an example of the exact opposite, i.e. the trust system working as intended. Avirunes does no longer work with that shady user, and I *trust* them enough not to warrant a negative. If he/she does continue working with him (or them), then they'd be a liar and that would warrant a negative from me as well.I think His existing camp with jamal is Utrust which is shady and still not paying their participants eventhough their coins and sale end up for long months ago.
But how could this guy get only neutral trust? Avirunes: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitfinnese-860327
That's not a link to Avirunes.this is an example of unfair trust system again since the only people has been tagged is those little guys but they will shaken off if the guy who do the same work is somehow big in their eyes.
No. It's an example of the exact opposite, i.e. the trust system working as intended. Avirunes does no longer work with that shady user, and I *trust* them enough not to warrant a negative. If he/she does continue working with him (or them), then they'd be a liar and that would warrant a negative from me as well.
As I've see the past people who work with jamal with campaign management got red trust due to negligence of work.
And the list of them are.
ShooterXD: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/shooterxd-819403
SmartIphone: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/smartiphone-374823
BitFinnese: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitfinnese-860327
But how could this guy get only neutral trust? Avirunes: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/avirunes-175302 this is an example of unfair trust system again since the only people has been tagged is those little guys but they will shaken off if the guy who do the same work is somehow big in their eyes.
Edited*
And the list of them are.
ShooterXD: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/shooterxd-819403
SmartIphone: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/smartiphone-374823
BitFinnese: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitfinnese-860327
But how could this guy get only neutral trust? Avirunes: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/avirunes-175302 this is an example of unfair trust system again since the only people has been tagged is those little guys but they will shaken off if the guy who do the same work is somehow big in their eyes.
Edited*
Jump to: