Author

Topic: ewbf vs. bminer (Read 129 times)

newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
May 12, 2018, 12:26:25 AM
#4
They yield about the same, I once did a test on 2 rigs, at the same time ( both 24 hours ), same pool ( 2 times a 12 rig 1080 ti )
Hashrate on Bminer a lot higher in the console, on the pool the gave the same. ( slightly difference, not word to mention )
EWBF is no longer worked on ( since a long time )  Bminer is, but some people have their thoughts about that Miner ( connections it makes, maker says it's against a mitm attack )
Just go with what's stable on your rig Smiley
full member
Activity: 394
Merit: 101
May 12, 2018, 12:19:28 AM
#3
And the question is ?


basically how is the yield compared between these two mines.
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
May 12, 2018, 12:16:31 AM
#2
And the question is ?

full member
Activity: 394
Merit: 101
May 11, 2018, 11:48:46 PM
#1
I largely used ewbf for zec mining for several months but buddy of mine used bminer. When looking at the shares by ewbf and bminer, the bminer approximately appears to be holding somewhere between 5-10 more shares than ewbf when looking at the mining pool address status. IMO, ewbf is a very good stable miner that worked excellent. However, does bminer is far more performance oriented? As far as the yield goes, it appears to be similar however I am not sure on this because I haven't made side by side comparison of yield.
Thanks.,
Jump to: