Cointelligence never promoted low-risk ICOs or any ICOs. LATOKEN CEO made this up at a debate we had. As you can read here the explanation about our ICO rating system (https://www.cointelligence.com/content/ico_list/) under the headline "How do we determine our risk score?". Its better to avoid making claims online unless you have evidence to back it up. Cointelligence doesnt have any "personal "scores" with LATOKEN. We investigated and called out LATOKEN as we did with other scammers as a part of our exchanges rating process (https://www.cointelligence.com/exchanges_list/) and we recieved evidence from doznes of "partners", ex-employees and founders they cheated. You can read about it here: https://www.cointelligence.com/exchanges_list/latoken/ - You can also read about LATOKEN scammy behavour here: https://bitcoinist.com/elon-musk-spacex-ieo-appears-on-suspicious-latoken-exchange/ - Beside protecing the community we have no other reason to call out LATOKEN as we were never hurt by them or had any business relationship with them.
I stopped trading on Latoken exchange in 2018 because they are full with fake volume and they held scam project's IEO on their launchpad! Because of their shitty IEO launchpad, many good projects got ruin! However, could you please give me the link where Cointelligence said Latoken is a scam? I need it to show to the Swapzilla team! As I had a talk with Swapzilla team, I told them to not come through Latoken IEO, they kept replying me with a silly excuse! Lol.
Much has changed since 2018 on Latoken. As of now, they work really fast, their support is perfect, but projects should pay more attention to the marketing responsibility zone. They think that the exchange makes it possible. But actually projects themselves should work on their results by market making etc. Btw, don't remember scam ieos there, remember ieo that didn't do anything for developing.
Actually, Cointelligence has personal scores with that exchange, so you shouldn't take it into account as an independent view on the platform. Besides, I've heard that they were caught on promotion low-risk ICOs that scammed people. So I clearly don't trust their reviews
Watch out for LA Token. The research firm Cointelligence has found that LATOKEN is a scam exchange. And if you go online you'll see all kinds of stories not just from former customers but even ex employees of the exchange who tells you all the stories of how they were scammed.
And they recently sponsored an event at Davos WEF so you know they're definitely scammers;)
And they recently sponsored an event at Davos WEF so you know they're definitely scammers;)
I stopped trading on Latoken exchange in 2018 because they are full with fake volume and they held scam project's IEO on their launchpad! Because of their shitty IEO launchpad, many good projects got ruin! However, could you please give me the link where Cointelligence said Latoken is a scam? I need it to show to the Swapzilla team! As I had a talk with Swapzilla team, I told them to not come through Latoken IEO, they kept replying me with a silly excuse! Lol.
Much has changed since 2018 on Latoken. As of now, they work really fast, their support is perfect, but projects should pay more attention to the marketing responsibility zone. They think that the exchange makes it possible. But actually projects themselves should work on their results by market making etc. Btw, don't remember scam ieos there, remember ieo that didn't do anything for developing.
Actually, Cointelligence has personal scores with that exchange, so you shouldn't take it into account as an independent view on the platform. Besides, I've heard that they were caught on promotion low-risk ICOs that scammed people. So I clearly don't trust their reviews
How can you say that if I see with my own eyes that right now Fiduxa is promoted in ICO ratings made by your own on CoIntelligence? Their website is not even opening! You do ratings of ICOs, allow scam projects to be included there, and now you make advertisement for yourself by blaming Latoken for something…
I don’t see any reasons to claim that they are a scam. Cointelligence is famous for defamations practices and lots of good projects already suffered from you. By claiming someone 'scammer' you are trying to shift the blame to someone else’s shoulders. But the truth is that in current case there are not real victims of latoken.
Fixuxa was never promoted by Cointeligence, it was rated by Cointelligence. Rating is not promotion, its a type of analysis. The fact Fiduxa was shutdown does not mean its a scam as most startups are doomed to fail. I suggset you educate yourself about the defintion of scam.
Anyways, I am not interested spending any additional time discussing this with you unless you are willing to connect via a video call so we can know who you are as I am suspecting you are an LATOKEN employee, otherwise you wouldnt have any reason defending LATOKEN as any sain person with half a brain can figure out they are a SCAM.
Actually, doing ratings is promotion as well. People’s decisions are based on ratings, all the market is based on them, you should clearly understand that.
And I am not LATOKEN ambassador to bother with a video call. Btw, LATOKEN employees have faces and phones just like me, they can do a call as well, you should think hard about it. And I am not initiating our discussion - it was your choice to register on BitcoinTalk to reply to me.
I think because you promoted as low-risk investments icos that have scammed people - and you did it also in the U.S. - you could be afraid that it may result in imprisonment for you... This is why you attack others to offset claims from yourself.
. despite the fact that many of the already existed project are closing down, there are still many of them on ANN thread still coming out about exchange development project. In fact strongly believe there are too many exchange platform. it is good that they are gradually doing down.
