Author

Topic: Experience with Ubuntu 10.4 + Radeon 6990? (Read 3250 times)

newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
We found support in win7 to be much better, making performance much better.  I can get about ~400mhps per core, so about 800mhps per 6990 without many problems (cards overclocked to 910mhz)
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Hello,
do you have any results yet? Are the 6990 running better on Win7 than Ubuntu? What did you end up using?
And which hashrate do you achieve with your current configuration?

greetings
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Steve / Ghost,

I'm tempted to go back and try it again with Ubuntu 11.04 and the newest Catalyst drivers and SDK - since I handled the deployment of the SDK files differently this time around.

But, I think I'll throw win 7 on it tomorrow and see if I notice a big difference in mhps.  I'm not feeling very confident in the Catalyst 11.3 drivers running on my installation.

I'm also wondering whats with 48% GPU load while running two instances of the phoenix miner, 1 per core:
 
Code:
$ aticonfig --adapter=0 --od-getclocks

Adapter 0 - AMD Radeon HD 6990
                            Core (MHz)    Memory (MHz)
           Current Clocks :    950           1250
             Current Peak :    950           1250
  Configurable Peak Range : [500-1200]     [1250-1500]
                 GPU load :    48%

$ aticonfig --adapter=1 --od-getclocks

Adapter 1 - AMD Radeon HD 6990
                            Core (MHz)    Memory (MHz)
           Current Clocks :    950           1250
             Current Peak :    950           1250
  Configurable Peak Range : [500-1200]     [1250-1500]
                 GPU load :    48%
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
Have you tried phoenix?
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1008
That's interesting...I was having all sorts of trouble with 10.10 (cloned from a 5970 based rig...but with sdk 2.4 and catalyst 11.4) and a 6990 (it wouldn't even read the clocks or temps using aticonfig)...I upgraded Ubuntu to 11.04 and suddenly everything started working.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
I messaged this but thought I'd include in the thread in case anyone else wants to chime in:

--

Thanks for the help with the Catalyst and SDK versions.  I'm curious how many mhps you're pulling per core on the 6990 using 11.3 and 2.3.

I'm getting way lower than expected, ~250mhps per core.  Running 1 core alone it's about 450 or so.

Did you have this issue too?  I'm thinking about putting on windows 7 just to see if the driver differences increase the hash rate.

Cheers
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Thanks, Ghost.

I ended up putting 11.3 and SDK 2.3 on a fresh install, copying some of the files over directly instead of doing a make, and removing the 64-bit files.  OpenCL then detected the GPUs.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250

I have Catalyst 11.4 installed and SDK 2.4 installed at /opt/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx32/

SDK 2.4 doesn't seem to have CLInfo in bin/, but 2.1 and 2.3 did, and it did not show any GPUs, just the CPU.


find /opt/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx32/ -name CLInfo  ... should tell you where it is


The output of the bitcoinpool poclb-mod.py script shows this issue as well:

Code:
$ python poclbm-mod.py 
#########################################################################
# BitcoinPool.Com Custom Miner -
#
# Visit http://www.bitcoinpool.com to register for a free account.
# Then use the following commandline to start mining, just replace
# the username and password with your own, and choose your device
# from the list below:
#
# poclbm-mod.exe --user=USERNAME --pass=PASSWORD -d #
#
# You must specify a device. Use -d to specify one of the following:
#
# [0] AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 260 Processor
#
# Use the --help flag for more options.
#########################################################################

Any idea on what is going on?  I'm assuming it is an issue with OpenCL or the 2.4 SDK detecting the card, but I'm out of ideas..



Did you do export DISPLAY=:0.0 before running poclbm-mod?
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
CLInfo moved into a different directory in SDK 2.4 but if you search around you'll find it. I recommend Catalyst 11.3 and SDK 2.3 (I also have a 6990 running Ubuntu 10.10).
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Hey guys,

I'm setting up a box with Ubuntu 10.4 (previously was running 11.04 but ran into too many issues) along with a Radeon 6990.  I'm having some issues presumably getting OpenCL to see the GPUs.

I have Catalyst 11.4 installed and SDK 2.4 installed at /opt/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx32/

fglrxinfo gives the following:

Code:
display: :0.0  screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon HD 6990
OpenGL version string: 4.1.10666 Compatibility Profile Context

display: :0.0  screen: 1
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon HD 6990
OpenGL version string: 4.1.10666 Compatibility Profile Context

SDK 2.4 doesn't seem to have CLInfo in bin/, but 2.1 and 2.3 did, and it did not show any GPUs, just the CPU.

The output of the bitcoinpool poclb-mod.py script shows this issue as well:

Code:
$ python poclbm-mod.py 
#########################################################################
# BitcoinPool.Com Custom Miner -
#
# Visit http://www.bitcoinpool.com to register for a free account.
# Then use the following commandline to start mining, just replace
# the username and password with your own, and choose your device
# from the list below:
#
# poclbm-mod.exe --user=USERNAME --pass=PASSWORD -d #
#
# You must specify a device. Use -d to specify one of the following:
#
# [0] AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 260 Processor
#
# Use the --help flag for more options.
#########################################################################

Any idea on what is going on?  I'm assuming it is an issue with OpenCL or the 2.4 SDK detecting the card, but I'm out of ideas..

My xorg.conf:

Code:
cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier     "aticonfig Layout"
Screen      0  "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0" 0 0
Screen         "aticonfig-Screen[1]-0" RightOf "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0"
EndSection

Section "Module"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier   "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
Option     "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option     "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option     "DPMS" "true"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier   "aticonfig-Monitor[1]-0"
Option     "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option     "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option     "DPMS" "true"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver      "fglrx"
BusID       "PCI:7:0:0"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "aticonfig-Device[1]-0"
Driver      "fglrx"
BusID       "PCI:6:0:0"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0"
Device     "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Monitor    "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
DefaultDepth     24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport   0 0
Depth     24
EndSubSection
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[1]-0"
Device     "aticonfig-Device[1]-0"
Monitor    "aticonfig-Monitor[1]-0"
DefaultDepth     24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport   0 0
Depth     24
EndSubSection
EndSection

Thanks!
Jump to: