Topic: Explanation of what is going on in Britain right now (Read 338 times)
Rather than attacking the UK, I think you should give us credit for knowing we are strong enough to grow without the EU, and for giving hope to countries like Greece that the EU is destroying.
i think the people are now dividing in groups. some whats the ref random again and the other are supporting the 1st one. i think they should sand form on their decision. they have to bare the difficulties if they want to be succeeded.
They really should've held a pretend referendum first to teach a few people a few lessons. It's a quite stunning balls up from whatever angle you possible look from. Still, it's all kind of exciting at the same time.
I think this vote was a protest about globalisation at its heart and that isn't going anywhere no matter who or what you vote for.
I think this vote was a protest about globalisation at its heart and that isn't going anywhere no matter who or what you vote for.
The following article is quite good on how Boris got done in:
http://reaction.life/boris-done-cuckoo-nest-plot/
http://reaction.life/boris-done-cuckoo-nest-plot/
We need a graph and a card games ;-). First who is fucking who and who has dirt on who?
The following was written by a chap called Benjamin Timothy Blaine and sums everything up nicely:
Quote
The leader of the opposition campaigned to stay but secretly wanted to leave, so his party held a non-binding vote to shame him into resigning so someone else could lead the campaign to ignore the result of the non-binding referendum which many people now think was just angry people trying to shame politicians into seeing they’d all done nothing to help them.
Meanwhile, the man who campaigned to leave because he hoped losing would help him win the leadership of his party, accidentally won and ruined any chance of leading because the man who thought he couldn’t lose, did – but resigned before actually doing the thing the vote had been about. The man who’d always thought he’d lead next, campaigned so badly that everyone thought he was lying when he said the economy would crash – and he was, but it did, but he’s not resigned, but, like the man who lost and the man who won, also now can’t become leader. Which means the woman who quietly campaigned to stay but always said she wanted to leave is likely to become leader instead.
Which means she holds the same view as the leader of the opposition but for opposite reasons, but her party’s view of this view is the opposite of the opposition’s. And the opposition aren’t yet opposing anything because the leader isn’t listening to his party, who aren’t listening to the country, who aren’t listening to experts or possibly paying that much attention at all. However, none of their opponents actually want to be the one to do the thing that the vote was about, so there’s not yet anything actually on the table to oppose anyway. And if no one ever does do the thing that most people asked them to do, it will be undemocratic and if any one ever does do it, it will be awful.
Clear?
Meanwhile, the man who campaigned to leave because he hoped losing would help him win the leadership of his party, accidentally won and ruined any chance of leading because the man who thought he couldn’t lose, did – but resigned before actually doing the thing the vote had been about. The man who’d always thought he’d lead next, campaigned so badly that everyone thought he was lying when he said the economy would crash – and he was, but it did, but he’s not resigned, but, like the man who lost and the man who won, also now can’t become leader. Which means the woman who quietly campaigned to stay but always said she wanted to leave is likely to become leader instead.
Which means she holds the same view as the leader of the opposition but for opposite reasons, but her party’s view of this view is the opposite of the opposition’s. And the opposition aren’t yet opposing anything because the leader isn’t listening to his party, who aren’t listening to the country, who aren’t listening to experts or possibly paying that much attention at all. However, none of their opponents actually want to be the one to do the thing that the vote was about, so there’s not yet anything actually on the table to oppose anyway. And if no one ever does do the thing that most people asked them to do, it will be undemocratic and if any one ever does do it, it will be awful.
Clear?
Jump to: