Author

Topic: extend the 21m bitcoin limit (Read 1321 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
December 31, 2014, 08:17:24 PM
#19
The actual number doesnt matter. Bitcoin can be divided into smaller units which work usually fine.

If you are talking in terms of inflation, some believe that a currency with a supply cap may lead to other problems.

What problems? I ask because there are coins like Nxt with a fixed quantity of coins from day one.

Unwieldy decimalization.
sr. member
Activity: 341
Merit: 250
December 31, 2014, 08:13:53 PM
#18
The actual number doesnt matter. Bitcoin can be divided into smaller units which work usually fine.

If you are talking in terms of inflation, some believe that a currency with a supply cap may lead to other problems.

What problems? I ask because there are coins like Nxt with a fixed quantity of coins from day one.
hero member
Activity: 584
Merit: 500
December 31, 2014, 07:52:18 PM
#17
The actual number doesnt matter. Bitcoin can be divided into smaller units which work usually fine.

If you are talking in terms of inflation, some believe that a currency with a supply cap may lead to other problems.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
December 31, 2014, 07:46:53 PM
#16
Writcoin™ creates a heterarchical monetary authority by permitting its end users to “spend” money into existence—approximating anarchist communism.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
December 31, 2014, 07:42:10 PM
#15
i think it is guldencoin more than 21m
sr. member
Activity: 341
Merit: 250
December 31, 2014, 03:30:19 PM
#14
bitcoin has its value because of its limited supply, if you want to see a lot of coins in your wallet then you should give a try to altcoins like Doge that have big supply, do you think that bitcoin will stay same if total supply is increased?
it will crash badly

There were some alts that reduced their total coins due to be minted to increase the price. It worked, and increasing the total coins due to be minted would probably crash the price.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
December 31, 2014, 03:07:46 PM
#13
I prefer the limit, coin values good that way.  Some coins have just a small amount that will continue to let the number of coins grow with almost the same effect.
hero member
Activity: 526
Merit: 500
December 31, 2014, 03:01:15 PM
#12
bitcoin has its value because of its limited supply, if you want to see a lot of coins in your wallet then you should give a try to altcoins like Doge that have big supply, do you think that bitcoin will stay same if total supply is increased?
it will crash badly
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 11
December 31, 2014, 06:52:53 AM
#11
I think the next currency that prevail  will not have the 21m limit,  or other limits;  please comment

the limit isn't the problem. Newsmedia who say the limit would be the problem are just the parrots of the existing powerstructure which is in fact scared by the hard limit because it threatens their moneypolicies. So in case bitcoin fails they will try to tell you it's because of the hard limit but that's a bold faced lie. Bitcoin fails because of the inflation or maybe because Karpeles sells the stolen coins but bitcoin fails not because of the hardlimit - that's propaganda from the existing powerstructure.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1009
December 31, 2014, 02:24:12 AM
#10
there are thousands of alt coins with bigger limits than 21M

Go for them if you think 21M is enough to destroy the usability of BTC in the long run
hero member
Activity: 502
Merit: 500
December 31, 2014, 12:26:35 AM
#9
I think the next currency that prevail  will not have the 21m limit,  or other limits;  please comment
if so then they will not have a value like bitcoin
i believe that the next big crypto currency will be based on POS algo with a decent interest rates
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
December 30, 2014, 11:56:54 PM
#8
nice trolling.
full member
Activity: 191
Merit: 100
December 30, 2014, 11:54:52 PM
#7
I think the next currency that prevail  will not have the 21m limit,  or other limits;  please comment
In order for a crypto currency to be successful it will need to have an upper limit otherwise it will be contentiously inflationary, whose inflation rate will rise at an ever increasing rate.

The 21 million bitcoin limit is really arbitrary because bitcoin can be divided into 8 decimal places and the protocol can easily be forked to allow for a more precise measure if the value of bitcoin were to increase too much
To be more precise, we are talking about infinite divisibility.
This is possible if the protocol were to be forked in the future, however it is neither needed nor possible now. Even though the protocol has always been divisible to up to 8 decimal places, for a while QT would only display two decimal places by default
sr. member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 326
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
December 30, 2014, 11:44:34 PM
#6
Other cryptos have tried it. Not sure what the effect is. Also, why do you think 21 is not enough?

The effect was a decrease in monetary value lol

Other cryptos have tried it. Not sure what the effect is. Also, why do you think 21 is not enough?

Yes, please state why you think it isn't enough. More decimal places can be added so there's more than enough to go around. If you want a crypto with billions of coins try a crapcoin or something.

Exactly what he said.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
December 30, 2014, 11:41:06 PM
#5
I think the next currency that prevail  will not have the 21m limit,  or other limits;  please comment
In order for a crypto currency to be successful it will need to have an upper limit otherwise it will be contentiously inflationary, whose inflation rate will rise at an ever increasing rate.

The 21 million bitcoin limit is really arbitrary because bitcoin can be divided into 8 decimal places and the protocol can easily be forked to allow for a more precise measure if the value of bitcoin were to increase too much
To be more precise, we are talking about infinite divisibility.
full member
Activity: 191
Merit: 100
December 30, 2014, 11:39:59 PM
#4
I think the next currency that prevail  will not have the 21m limit,  or other limits;  please comment
In order for a crypto currency to be successful it will need to have an upper limit otherwise it will be contentiously inflationary, whose inflation rate will rise at an ever increasing rate.

The 21 million bitcoin limit is really arbitrary because bitcoin can be divided into 8 decimal places and the protocol can easily be forked to allow for a more precise measure if the value of bitcoin were to increase too much
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
December 30, 2014, 11:38:24 PM
#3
Other cryptos have tried it. Not sure what the effect is. Also, why do you think 21 is not enough?

Yes, please state why you think it isn't enough. More decimal places can be added so there's more than enough to go around. If you want a crypto with billions of coins try a crapcoin or something.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
December 30, 2014, 11:27:53 PM
#2
Other cryptos have tried it. Not sure what the effect is. Also, why do you think 21 is not enough?
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
December 30, 2014, 11:26:03 PM
#1
I think the next currency that prevail  will not have the 21m limit,  or other limits;  please comment
Jump to: