Author

Topic: False Negative Trust on My Profile (Read 356 times)

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1253
So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)
January 11, 2018, 01:39:12 AM
#16
-snip-
Fuck You.

If that is all you have to say after all these things that have been dug up about you and your team I would say you deserve not one but multiple negative ratings from DT members. Scumbags like you who spam the forum with that "Who does not like free money" is the reason why this forum is going to a shithole.

Consider your contribution to this shithole void transfer to be 90% - copy pasting and abusing campaigns with it. You guys make this forum look like a playground and something to draw cash from when the paycheck is not coming.

You people deserve IP bans if not more.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
January 10, 2018, 04:58:14 PM
#15
This is a perfect example of why banning people is pointless because admins never look into alts despite repeated requests. Tapansharma and his school buddies belong to a group of spammers and scammers and they've been sig spamming, account farming and copy and pasting going back years. He and his friends will almost certainly have dozens of other accounts continuing on doing the same. A simple IP check on this user and his known alts would probably unearth a goldmine of shitposting but he/they will almost certainly just continue to evade and shitpost on numerous alts until they slip up again.
If the twitter account connection is legitimate (which I haven't checked out yet), then this guy dates back long ago and is a serial scammer. Isn't it amazing how, very often when someone makes a butthurt crusade thread against me, we end up digging up more stuff about them and often experience a huge plot twist? I try my best, but the admins.. Embarrassed

...You know an offer like that would only attract assholes who wouldn't otherwise qualify for a sig campaign.
By that logic anyone that signs up on this forum is an asshole. Everyone that does not meet a sig camp's qualification criteria. Is an asshole.
There is absolutely no reason to take up such an offer if you can enroll in a standard campaign, of which there are plenty.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
January 10, 2018, 01:56:58 PM
#14
It's not pointless, just like pulling over a single speeder on a highway full of speeders isn't pointless.   Without any enforcement there would be no purpose for rules--or even guidelines.   Frustrating for you and the other mods, yes, and I totally understand that.   But please don't throw up your hands and declare failure just yet.  You're like one of about three mods who actually give a shit about doing their jobs. 

This guy put in some effort to rank up that account,  so banning him will have a definite (albeit small) effect overall.
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 764
www.V.systems
January 10, 2018, 01:49:54 PM
#13
...You know an offer like that would only attract assholes who wouldn't otherwise qualify for a sig campaign.

By that logic anyone that signs up on this forum is an asshole. Everyone that does not meet a sig camp's qualification criteria. Is an asshole.

Anyone wanting BTC for TOKENS without holding them for speculative trading ... is an asshole.

Let that sink in.


Nuff said.
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 3060
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
January 10, 2018, 01:47:46 PM
#12
I love when plagiarizing suckers get banned, but it's satisfyingly sweet justice when they get the hammer after calling attention to themselves whilst bitching about negative trust.  Bonus endorphins when it's a neg from Lauda.  I do love it so. 

Feedback is correct for the original charge, IMO so this joker at the very least deserves that one.  Didn't realize the Jamal guy was such a scammer, but it doesn't shock me.  He was just trying to subcontract shitposters for some altcoin bounty and that struck me as a bit shady and definitely not something that would be beneficial to bitcointalk.  You know an offer like that would only attract assholes who wouldn't otherwise qualify for a sig campaign.

This is a perfect example of why banning people is pointless because admins never look into alts despite repeated requests. Tapansharma and his school buddies belong to a group of spammers and scammers and they've been sig spamming, account farming and copy and pasting going back years. He and his friends will almost certainly have dozens of other accounts continuing on doing the same. A simple IP check on this user and his known alts would probably unearth a goldmine of shitposting but he/they will almost certainly just continue to evade and shitpost on numerous alts until they slip up again.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
January 10, 2018, 01:35:08 PM
#11
I love when plagiarizing suckers get banned, but it's satisfyingly sweet justice when they get the hammer after calling attention to themselves whilst bitching about negative trust.  Bonus endorphins when it's a neg from Lauda.  I do love it so. 

Feedback is correct for the original charge, IMO so this joker at the very least deserves that one.  Didn't realize the Jamal guy was such a scammer, but it doesn't shock me.  He was just trying to subcontract shitposters for some altcoin bounty and that struck me as a bit shady and definitely not something that would be beneficial to bitcointalk.  You know an offer like that would only attract assholes who wouldn't otherwise qualify for a sig campaign.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
January 10, 2018, 01:12:30 PM
#10
What about the fact that you are not even who you say you are?


OP used(s) the twitter handle "tapansharma2" here: https://archive.fo/77rxu#selection-781.0-787.38. Old thread there that handle was mentioned: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11615967.

It looks like that his twitter handle is most likely tapansharma2 (archive).
Interesting.
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 764
www.V.systems
January 10, 2018, 01:09:17 PM
#9
What about the fact that you are not even who you say you are?
https://image.ibb.co/fmxmK6/evekilledadam.jpg
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
January 10, 2018, 01:03:46 PM
#8
I'd also add, you should really be banned for copy/pasting:
Nice work. I didn't expect that one, and thus didn't ask 8ball about it. Lips sealed
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
January 10, 2018, 12:59:19 PM
#7
I'd also add, you should really be banned for copy/pasting:



One mistake that many people made, is to think it's too late when it's still quite early.

When Bitcoin crossed $2000, people said ‘let’s wait till it get back to $1000′. When it crossed $4000 they said ‘let’s wait till it get to $2000′, now it has crossed $18000 with no big dip in the process and those people lost a ton of free money.

Bitcoin still has a great potential to rise ahead in upcoming year.

Why? Because with more exposure to Bitcoin and its return, demand of Bitcoin is increasing but it’s production is limited. High demand, low supply leads to price rise!

If you can make $5000 -$6000 in profit even after buying it at $15000, what’s wrong ?

I would say, Buy and Hold. Keep calm and trust Bitcoin, it won’t disappoint you!

Act now or lose free money like many people did and regret now.

https://www.quora.com/Is-it-a-good-time-to-buy-Bitcoin-June-July-August-2017



Media and People have been calling Bitcoin a ‘bubble’ for the past few years. There have been increasing comments of the ‘Bitcoin bubble’ bursting in the very near future, I do believe that Bitcoin is in a bubble and the bubble will burst (because all of them do), I will explain why I don’t think the bubble will burst anytime soon.

Below is a chart that shows a range of times the media has said that the bubble will burst:

When will the bitcoin bubble burst?

No-one can actually tell that when a bubble is going to or will burst; This is similar to the stock market just as it is with the crypto currency market. In the above chart you can see how the media have tried to make this prediction and failed many times. Bitcoin is often compared to various bubbles that have happened throughout history and are commonly fundamentally flawed in the comparison. This is most likely due to the lack of understanding of what Bitcoin, and what blockchain technology is.



https://www.cryptoinvestorsblog.co.uk/single-post/2017/10/16/THE-CRYPTO-CURRENCY-BUBBLE-EXPLAINED




If you have a high tendency to not stop until busting, then I came across these tips which do help:

  • Don't put all your available bankroll directly in the game (in case you're using deposits). Leave always at least half outside as a security measure if you go bust.
  • One must stop after reaching a certain goal, The goal should be predetermined and shouldn't be changed during the play.
  • If you're doing really good, withdraw part of your earnings (if you can, ofc) to avoid losing it all in one go.

Having a big bankroll can make you feel falsely safe in that "oh I'll just keep increasing my bet until I win" but alas, the 30 reds in a row do exist, and will come. Do not let them take it all.

The goal you make should be realistic and firm, Don't change it or else be prepared to face bad consequences.

You gotta fight back the voice that screams inside your brain "Come on, double again and we recover!".

https://forum.primedice.com/topic/29599-when-do-you-stop/?page=2



I agree, Bitcoin with it's high fees and slow transaction times is hardly suitable for payments – spending the same fee whether you buy a coffee or send $100,000 is a joke and the promise of scaling solutions such as the Lightning Network hasn’t been fulfilled.

Year 2017 was surely of Bitcoin, with more than 1600% increase in the price of Bitcoins, Reaching both milestones of 1k$ per coin to 10k$ per coin in the same year.

But Year 2018 will be the year of Ethereum or in general, of Blockchain.
The door is wide open for blockchains that use smart contracts, like Ethereum, and I believe their potential market dwarfs that of "store of value" chains. Platforms like ethereum are an operating system for decentralized finance and commerce.


Low transaction fees and fast confirmations are attracting more people to switch to Ethereum. I am confident that it will reach 1000$ per coin in early 2018.



https://www.coindesk.com/2017-bitcoins-year-2018-will-ethereums/
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
January 10, 2018, 12:44:02 PM
#6
Fuck You.
https://archive.fo/0sTZW#selection-4289.0-4289.9

Sounds like exactly what someone would do, in panic, after being exposed.
I used ;;8ball to make this prediction. Grin
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
January 10, 2018, 12:40:45 PM
#5
Paying BTC to those who would give him tokens gained from Signature Bounties.
No. That would be purchasing tokens. He created a campaign to enroll other people's (or his own) accounts to farm bounties.

If this was against the forum rules, he should have been stopped right there and then,
Forum rules are not relevant to the trust system.

How can't I be an untrusted member if I was working under an accused guy which i didn't even know.
I like stories.

I am completely innocent in this matter.
If you were innocent, I wouldn't have found your account and wouldn't have tagged you.

I suggest, for next time, that you put priority in some sort of *code* (or morals or ethics or whatever you are in to) before your own greed ("who doesn't like easy money").
Fuck You.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
January 10, 2018, 12:34:46 PM
#4
Paying BTC to those who would give him tokens gained from Signature Bounties.
No. That would be purchasing tokens. He created a campaign to enroll other people's (or his own) accounts to farm bounties.

If this was against the forum rules, he should have been stopped right there and then,
Forum rules are not relevant to the trust system.

How can't I be an untrusted member if I was working under an accused guy which i didn't even know.
I like stories.

I am completely innocent in this matter.
If you were innocent, I wouldn't have found your account and wouldn't have tagged you.

I suggest, for next time, that you put priority in some sort of *code* (or morals or ethics or whatever you are in to) before your own greed ("who doesn't like easy money").
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
January 10, 2018, 12:16:16 PM
#3
First of all, I didn't know about this thread,
Irrelevant. The thread is just the place from which the investigation started.

Secondly, I am not his alt.
Irrelevant. Was never implied.

Thirdly, I am working for Jamal because he was looking for a campaign manager and I am getting paid for doing so.
Relevant and correct.

You are running, i.e. managing the signature campaign used for farming[1] by Jamal. Instead of posting from multiple accounts (as he did own or currently owns multiple accounts) as he did before, he hired people to do this for him. I don't find this much different than the traditional farming via multiple accounts. Therefore, you as an accomplice can't be trusted. Therefore, you received a negative trust rating.
Furthermore, you've absolutely failed to make a case to defend yourself and have spammed about it via different channels (2 PMs within an hour, thread in the wrong section (this one) and posted in the other thread as well). Sounds like exactly what someone would do, in panic, after being exposed. What exactly is *false*?

[1] All of these accounts will be SMAS blacklisted, including all the managers. They have also been reported to the Staff and may be neg. rated as well. Who's to say he isn't pretending to *enroll* his own accounts to get away from posting via multiple accounts? Roll Eyes
He posted a Thread on Services section regarding the service which he was providing : Paying BTC to those who would give him tokens gained from Signature Bounties. If this was against the forum rules, he should have been stopped right there and then, As there was no objection seen on that thread, I didn't find anything wrong in earning a few extra bucks in managing the spreadsheet of the signature campaign, who doesn't like easy money?

I don't know him personally, talked to him for the first time on Telegram. How can't I be an untrusted member if I was working under an accused guy which i didn't even know.
This is similar to calling all the bank employees scammers if the Manager runs away with Money, sounds stupid.

Quote
I don't find this much different than the traditional farming via multiple accounts. Therefore, you as an accomplice can't be trusted. Therefore, you received a negative trust rating.
I have already shown you the whole chat, This was the first time I was working as a campaign manager and I am completely innocent in this matter. If this was a crime, then it should have been pointed out earlier on his service thread. I am not a 'MOD' or 'Lauda' to know all these things.

*I can't be trusted because I was being paid for working with a 'criminal' of this forum. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
January 10, 2018, 11:49:55 AM
#2
First of all, I didn't know about this thread,
Irrelevant. The thread is just the place from which the investigation started.

Secondly, I am not his alt.
Irrelevant. Was never implied.

Thirdly, I am working for Jamal because he was looking for a campaign manager and I am getting paid for doing so.
Relevant and correct.

You are running, i.e. managing the signature campaign used for farming[1] by Jamal. Instead of posting from multiple accounts (as he did own or currently owns multiple accounts) as he did before, he hired people to do this for him. I don't find this much different than the traditional farming via multiple accounts. Therefore, you as an accomplice can't be trusted. Therefore, you received a negative trust rating.
Furthermore, you've absolutely failed to make a case to defend yourself and have spammed about it via different channels (2 PMs within an hour, thread in the wrong section (this one) and posted in the other thread as well). Sounds like exactly what someone would do, in panic, after being exposed. What exactly is *false*?

[1] All of these accounts will be SMAS blacklisted, including all the managers. They have also been reported to the Staff and may be neg. rated as well. Who's to say he isn't pretending to *enroll* his own accounts to get away from posting via multiple accounts? Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
January 10, 2018, 11:43:31 AM
#1
1. I have posted this on the scam accusation thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/etheriya-lead-iam2good-and-team-member-visale-etheriya-bounty-campaign-2681942 and even PMed him but was ignored.

So today @Lauda gave me a negative trust on my profile which says this :

Accounts connected: jamalaezaz (uuid = 721115), SmartIphone (uuid = 374823), ShooterXD (uuid = 819403), BitFinnese (uuid = 860327).
CyberR, aka @EveKilledAdam (https://archive.fo/xFp3U#selection-553.2-553.15), aka Jessica Reily, has been knowingly working for/with jamalaezaz, and SmartIphone.
The user has kept quiet regarding the shady activities of the former (account trading, farming, and trust farming: see reference rating https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=721115), as well the latter who is involved in a scam accusation (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-manager-smartiphone-and-sam-discussion-of-the-thread-centra-2553092).

It is also likely that this user is managing or helping manage Jamal's signature group involved in farming and spamming.


First of all, I didn't know about this thread, Secondly, I am not his alt. Thirdly, I am working for Jamal because he was looking for a campaign manager and I am getting paid for doing so.
I got proofs for it.





Take a look please and give a verdict.

I was* working with Jamal, Have never talked to SmartIphone. I don't check Scam Accusation thread often and all my conversations with Jamal were on Telegram and Skype, so I didn't get a chance to look at his profile. Giving negative feedback for ignoring a scam accusation thread, really?  Roll Eyes

Code:
[10:23:57 AM] Jessica:
If you don't mind, Can you give me a chance to handle the campaign?
 It's okay if you don't*
 You've nothing to lose

[10:25:27 AM] Jamal:
And you have a lot to lose?

[10:26:00 AM] Jamal:
Forwarded message: Jamal Aezaz [12/26/17]
I'll give you lots of ethereum wallets and name of project.  Then it's your work to make sure everyone join the altcoin bounty using my address and complete his required posts.

[10:26:59 AM] Jessica:
I will make sure that happens
 Thankyou :purple_heart:

[11:37:34 AM] Jessica:
When will the campaign start?

[11:40:07 AM] Jamal:
Lets start it now.
 Can you make spreadsheets?

[11:40:19 AM] Jessica:
I Can
 Will I get paid extra for managing it?

[11:40:44 AM] Jamal:
Of course.
 Make a spreadsheet and add all users details there.
 Username. Profile link. Rank. BTC address

[11:42:24 AM] Jessica:
Sure, I'll do that in a bit
 Weekly payments, Right?

[11:53:17 AM] Jamal:
Just get the details first. I'll think about payment shortly.
 I'm still not sure which payment terms would be better.

[11:55:01 AM] Jessica:
I guess people might not want to join till they now how much and when they are gonna get paid
 I will make the spreadsheet in a few minutes, I'm in bank right now

[1:50:33 PM] Jessica:
Hey there?
 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1te8Xa4E3MzkciXtkc1LWy93mlvl3LDCWob5FZQQaObU/edit?usp=sharing

Google Docs
Jamal Aezaz Campaign
Sheet1

Bitcointalk Username, Bitcointalk Profile URL, Telegram Username, Bitcointalk Rank, Bitcoin Address, Amount Pending
 Looks Good?

[2:45:51 PM] Jamal:
Can you send me the access?

[2:46:21 PM] Jessica:
Sure, What's your email?

[2:49:37 PM] Jamal:
[email protected]

[2:50:14 PM] Jessica:
I just gave you access

[8:16:03 PM] Jessica:
Any Updates?

--- Wednesday, December 27, 2017 ---

[1:40:20 AM] Jamal:
I can't see any update yet.
 I think you cannot do it
 I asked you to collect all details but you just sent me the empty sheet?

[10:19:17 AM] Jessica:
You didn't update with the terms of the campaign yet
 How can I ask people for details when the campaign is itself unclear on how it's going to work

[10:21:18 AM] Jamal:
Yeah that's right

[10:23:19 AM] Jessica:
So what did you decide about it? The terms?

[12:51:21 PM] Jessica:
??

[7:38:17 PM] Jamal:
Hi

[7:39:46 PM] Jessica:
Hi
 What's Up?

--- Thursday, December 28, 2017 ---

[9:11:35 PM] Jamal:
Hi
 Do you have Skype?

[9:14:57 PM] Jessica:
Hi
 I used to have it, Uninstalled it
 What for?

[11:24:04 PM] Jamal:
To contact you

[11:29:41 PM] Jessica:
We are already in contact over Telegram ;)

[11:30:39 PM] Jamal:
I have telegram on mobile only so not comfortable.

[11:31:13 PM] Jessica:
Okay, I will install Skype again

[11:35:10 PM] Jamal:
https://medium.com/@jamalaezaz/join-an-altcoin-sigcamp-and-get-paid-in-btc-12c67f5341a0
Medium
Join an Altcoin SigCamp and Get Paid in BTC
Hi Guys! here I am writing the whole terms and Conditions and requirements to get paid in BTC to join an altcoin Bounty Campaign.
 BTW.  I've wrote this.

[11:40:07 PM] Jessica:
Sounds good, Why did you skip the idea of weekly payment? It would attract much more participation.

--- Friday, December 29, 2017 ---

[12:58:59 PM] Jessica:
Hey there? A guy is asking if he can join the campaign from two different accounts, Is it allowed?

[1:17:59 PM] Jamal:
Yes but he have to join 2 different altcoin bounties.  Because joining same campaign with 2 account is against the forum and bounty rules.

[1:20:58 PM] Jessica:
I'll update him about this.
 Logan is asking if he can get weekly payment for the campaign
 This is his profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=93844

[3:08:43 PM] Jessica:
Can you tell me how much will I get paid for managing the campaign?

[4:30:15 PM] Jamal:
5%

[4:33:38 PM] Jessica:
5% of what

[4:37:41 PM] Jamal:
No more available slots for now. We'll increase it when we get good projects . Please announce it.

[4:54:29 PM] Jamal:
> Jessica Reily
> 5% of what
Of whatever all participants receive

[4:55:16 PM] Jessica:
Can you pay me weekly in advance for managing the campaign?
 Total divided by 4.

[5:39:04 PM] Jamal:
How could we know the total?

[5:42:02 PM] Jessica:
We can calculate the total easily, why can't we? We know how many members are in there right, and how much we are paying them for a month
 If incase someone leaves in between, You can deduct his pay from my pay in the last week.

[5:50:06 PM] Jamal:
Ok.

[5:52:46 PM] Jessica:
I'll calculate the total and will let you know, Just a moment
 Total sums up to -> $2200
 5% of it is $110
 This is excluding the extra 5% bonus which we can adjust after the Campaign ends.
 $110 divided into 4 weeks = $27.5 per week in Advance
 Is that Okay?

[6:00:53 PM] Jamal:
So what should I do?

[6:01:10 PM] Jessica:
Do you mind paying me weekly for managing the campaign?
 I will keep a check regularly on members who haven't posted the min. required posts and whose post quality isn't upto the mark
 You won't get a chance to complain

[6:04:33 PM] Jamal:
Ok.

[6:24:18 PM] Jessica:
Can you make me the Admin of the group?
 Please give me your Skype ID

[6:57:30 PM] Jamal:
LABZANK

--- Saturday, December 30, 2017 ---

[3:13:16 PM] Jamal:
Accept bittrafic .

[4:33:05 PM] Jessica:
What?

[4:41:08 PM] Jamal:
Forwarded message: Jamal Aezaz [12/30/17]
Accept bittrafic .

[4:49:55 PM] Jessica:
Oh okay

[6:01:50 PM] Jessica:
You want to me to add Bittrafic in the campaign?

[7:26:19 PM] Jamal:
Yes ma'am.

[7:26:54 PM] Jessica:
When does the campaign start?
 No one with that name is in the group : bittrafic

[7:30:13 PM] Jamal:
> Jessica Reily
> No one with that name is in the group : bittrafic
I think he have another username.

[7:31:17 PM] Jessica:
Update me with his username!

--- Sunday, December 31, 2017 ---

[11:32:03 AM] Jessica:
I have added one more Hero Member you asked for, The slots are full now, right?

[11:35:35 AM] Jamal:
No. Add 2 more.

[11:35:46 AM] Jessica:
Ranks?
 I am receiving messages of people asking about the campaign they have to join, When will you update about it?

[12:08:45 PM] Jessica:
Which ranks should I accept?

[12:21:58 PM] Jamal:
Hero

[2:56:15 PM] Jessica:
Hey Jamal did you think about my proposal of payment
 For managing and keeping a check on everyone throughout the campaign

[3:24:52 PM] Jamal:
> Jessica Reily
> For managing and keeping a check on everyone throughout the campaign
Yes. We agreed for 5%. Right?

[3:32:06 PM] Jessica:
Yes we did, But 5% weekly advance payment
 Can you do that please?

[3:32:29 PM] Jamal:
You mean now?

[3:40:08 PM] Jessica:
Yes, 5% of Total divided by 4.
 Every week

[3:40:54 PM] Jamal:
OK.  I'll pay you weekly along with the weekly paying users.

[3:41:37 PM] Jessica:
Great

[6:56:42 PM] Jessica:
Hey, You have assigned Both accounts of Jayesh in same campaign

[7:00:05 PM] Jamal:
Can you charge?

[7:00:20 PM] Jessica:
You mean change?
 I'll do that

[7:47:31 PM] Jamal:
You have to contact everyone and make sure they join the  bounty.

[7:47:48 PM] Jessica:
I'll do that

[7:47:59 PM] Jamal:
And always be careful and don't let them change their wallets in bounties.
 If they do that they'll be banned

[7:48:39 PM] Jessica:
I'll keep a check on that

--- Monday, January 1, 2018 ---

[5:29:29 PM] Jamal:
What is your forum name?

[5:31:41 PM] Jessica:
CyberR.

[5:38:53 PM] Jamal:
Can you follow the thread and PM those interested users?
 Get their details.  And add them in spreadsheet.

[7:15:07 PM] Jessica:
I'll do that :)
 Will inform you once done, How many more slots are available?

--- Tuesday, January 2, 2018 ---

[12:31:48 AM] Jessica:
Can you give me the thread link please? I can't find it

[12:47:22 AM] Jessica:
Nevermind, I got it, PMing everyone now

[3:17:56 PM] Jessica:
Hey, I have got 4-5 applications
 I'll update the spreadsheet in a while
 Travelling back home

[5:51:33 PM] Jessica:
Hey I have update the list with more participants, please assign them campaigns. Also, I have messaged those members who haven't yet put up signatures. They have been warned, If I don't get a reply in a day, Please remove them from the campaign.
 Also, Kick Pacayra

--- Wednesday, January 3, 2018 ---

[8:57:06 AM] Jessica:
Hey, Two members who have already been assigned a campaign have said they don't want to participate anymore
 What to do?

[11:30:42 PM] Jamal:
Remove them and add new members.

--- Friday, January 5, 2018 ---

[1:02:00 AM] Jamal:
Hi

[1:02:10 AM] Jessica:
Hi

[8:03:29 AM] Jessica:
How have you been
 I have got replies of people whom I sent pm, should I tell them that no slots are left?

[11:10:36 AM] Jamal:
I've updated the sheet.
 Please inform everyone and make sure they must join the bounty today.  It's last day today.

[12:32:04 PM] Jessica:
Okay, Doing that now

--- Saturday, January 6, 2018 ---

[12:31:01 AM] Jamal:
Are they joined?

[12:32:00 AM] Jessica:
Yessir, They were all informed. I'll check the status now and update you
 Give me 5 minutes
 Everyone except 3 have joined, I will give them last reminder.
 Also two members have already called themselves off, I have written not joined next totheir name
 And all the new guys have joined some AIDA Service campaign, is that correct?

[12:41:51 AM] Jamal:
Aida services?

[12:42:04 AM] Jessica:
Yes

[12:42:12 AM] Jamal:
Link please.

[12:44:00 AM] Jessica:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=880374
 see his profile
 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2664813.msg27183199#msg27183199

[12:47:22 AM] Jamal:
No. It's not provided by me.

[12:48:19 AM] Jessica:
I have written Not Joined next to all defaulters

--- Sunday, January 7, 2018 ---

[1:40:13 PM] Jessica:
Weekly payments need to be sent out today, Should I calculate and tell you?

[6:32:59 PM] Jamal:
Yes please.

[7:03:48 PM] Jessica:
Okay
 Wait

[8:36:29 PM] Jessica:
Legendster = $250/4 = $62.5 -> 19zNeBtpQSsBQZPivncHPyxF5YxrQTJbNL
Soham = $200/4 = $50 -> 1HpWr5eqQhX7rPN23YgoSY2KqS9XPETzGs

[8:46:39 PM] Jamal:
And your details?

[8:46:42 PM] Jessica:
are you covering the fees?
 My Address is 1BT21LbS9DLNiBZpfjBhXdDtGN4hHRHXYv

[8:47:01 PM] Jamal:
Can you send these details to me via Skype?

[8:47:15 PM] Jessica:
I already did :blush:

[10:18:52 PM] Jessica:
Some people just asked me if there's any spot left.
 Should I replace inactive ones with them?

[10:38:44 PM] Jamal:
No now.

[10:39:01 PM] Jessica:
What?

This is whole chat with him on Telegram till date.
Jump to: