Author

Topic: FBI Says No One Killed at Sandy Hook (Read 1043 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 26, 2014, 10:11:55 AM
#14
So, some "conspiracy nutters" made a mistake about classifying. The fact - if Sandy Hook was real - is that there were deaths, right. And everybody knows that there were deaths (except the conspiracy nutters, that is), right. So what possible reason could the FBI have for redacting the number of deaths right off their statistics page?
Who said anything about deaths? The report doesn't say deaths, it says murders. And nobody was ever charged for the murders, on account of the perpetrator having killed himself immediately after. That alone is a plausible reason why they went unreported.

Good point. Semantics. Ever heard of "legalease?" That's where the legal industry has changed the meanings of common words that we all think that we know. When you get into their courts or other jurisdictions, you might think you know what you are talking about. But you don't. Not even if you have studied their dictionaries and encyclopedias.

In this case, the behind-the-scenes point is, was SHE a hoax? If it really happened the way the official reports go, why won't government answer a whole lot of legitimate questions surrounding the incident?

Whatever the truth is, something fishy was/is going on with SHE. And the real point is to find out what it was/is.

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
September 26, 2014, 09:02:45 AM
#13
murder, manslaughter.  it's all an issue of semantics
legendary
Activity: 4536
Merit: 3188
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
September 26, 2014, 05:46:29 AM
#12
So, some "conspiracy nutters" made a mistake about classifying. The fact - if Sandy Hook was real - is that there were deaths, right. And everybody knows that there were deaths (except the conspiracy nutters, that is), right. So what possible reason could the FBI have for redacting the number of deaths right off their statistics page?
Who said anything about deaths? The report doesn't say deaths, it says murders. And nobody was ever charged for the murders, on account of the perpetrator having killed himself immediately after. That alone is a plausible reason why they went unreported.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 26, 2014, 03:29:15 AM
#11
If Alex Jones and Prison Planet - http://www.prisonplanet.com/ - are only 1% correct, but 99% wrong, we are so screwed.

Smiley
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
September 26, 2014, 03:19:33 AM
#10
Thats the problem with conspiracy theorists, everything is an inside job.

9

so you believe everything the media said right ?

sound like an average joe public
sr. member
Activity: 295
Merit: 250
Nenávist má sestru, to je závist.
September 26, 2014, 01:55:56 AM
#9
Thats the problem with conspiracy theorists, everything is an inside job.

9
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
September 26, 2014, 01:52:04 AM
#8
No way the media will tell the truth.

try to hide it under the cover
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 26, 2014, 12:57:21 AM
#7
The point is, we don't always know what the truth is. Certainly the media doesn't always report it. And conspiracy theorists are wrong at times, as well. The moment we start taking everything at face value is the moment we are lost.

Smiley
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
September 25, 2014, 08:50:15 PM
#6
What makes me laugh most about people that believe these conspiracy theories is that they are so distrustful of anything the mainstream media says, yet they are willing to believe a random, poorly written blog at the drop of a hat.

Heard that! Case in point was all those nut-jobs claiming that a raid occurred with US Marshals at BFL last Friday. We all know that was a lie because Bruce worked there till 4 PM negating the lies that the place of close. Come Tuesday, a local TV station expanded upon the lie outside BFL's front door pretending the doors were locked. Again, Bruce went on record that he worked Monday as well, thus those that continued the BFL-was-raided conspiracy should have their nuts cut off, and Bruce should be awarded a metal for being the only one providing the truth. Hell, even Josh came right out and stated that it was a rumor and speculation, for he would have been notified immediately no matter where he was located in the world at the time if something was amiss, of which there wasn't.

That said, anybody game in reenacting one of the three fake beheadings by that ISIS actor, followed by a lecture as to how it's possible for a Boeing 707 to exceed it maximum control speed at sea level to hit a needle in a haystack if you take into consideration its pilot couldn't control a Cessna?
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
September 25, 2014, 04:07:32 PM
#5
What makes me laugh most about people that believe these conspiracy theories is that they are so distrustful of anything the mainstream media says, yet they are willing to believe a random, poorly written blog at the drop of a hat.

Funny how consiracy theorists provide such little and crappy evidence to prove their theories, yet tell us that politicians and the media are all lies.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1000
September 25, 2014, 04:05:22 PM
#4
What makes me laugh most about people that believe these conspiracy theories is that they are so distrustful of anything the mainstream media says, yet they are willing to believe a random, poorly written blog at the drop of a hat.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 25, 2014, 09:52:21 AM
#3
I think these conspiracy nutters would be more credible if their evidence didn't contain obvious lies.
Quote
Why and for what reason would the FBI classify the SHES shooting when they did not classify the Columbine shooting which also was an Active Shooter Mass Casualty Incidents (AS/MCI)?
The Columbine case was classified "Confidential" by the FBI. Why do they suppose the files released under FOIA were so heavily redacted? This fact is so easily verified that I'm baffled as to why anyone would lie about it. Did they honestly think nobody would check? Roll Eyes

So, some "conspiracy nutters" made a mistake about classifying. The fact - if Sandy Hook was real - is that there were deaths, right. And everybody knows that there were deaths (except the conspiracy nutters, that is), right. So what possible reason could the FBI have for redacting the number of deaths right off their statistics page? Are they trying to flush out some conspiracy nutters by watching to see how many people will report the statistics page redacting? Or did they simply make a mistake? If they made a mistake, we should see a correction soon, right? I mean, its been 2 years since SHE!

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4536
Merit: 3188
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
September 25, 2014, 04:14:41 AM
#2
I think these conspiracy nutters would be more credible if their evidence didn't contain obvious lies.
Quote
Why and for what reason would the FBI classify the SHES shooting when they did not classify the Columbine shooting which also was an Active Shooter Mass Casualty Incidents (AS/MCI)?
The Columbine case was classified "Confidential" by the FBI. Why do they suppose the files released under FOIA were so heavily redacted? This fact is so easily verified that I'm baffled as to why anyone would lie about it. Did they honestly think nobody would check? Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
September 25, 2014, 03:32:22 AM
#1
"Recently released FBI crime statistics curiously show that no murders occurred in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, despite reports that numerous schoolchildren and faculty members were slaughtered during a shooting rampage in December of that year."

http://www.prisonplanet.com/fbi-says-no-one-killed-at-sandy-hook.html

FBI Report: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/8tabledatadecpdf/table-8-state-cuts/table_8_offenses_known_to_law_enforcement_by_connecticut_by_city_2012.xls#disablemobile

Look at the comments in the Prison Planet link.

What do you think?

Smiley
Jump to: