feedback | Bitcointalksearch.org

dragonvslinux

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 2213

Cross-quoting for reference sake, as is relevant to the negative trust received by the user in question.

Quote from: dragonvslinux on January 10, 2020, 05:34:07 AM

Quote from: dragonvslinux on November 10, 2019, 04:06:18 PM

Ever feel like your digging yourself a hole?

Cross-referencing the following for relevance sake: mosprognoz "voted out" of DefaultTrust group for poor judgement, attempted blackmail and extortion.

Quote from: eddie13 on January 08, 2020, 04:49:53 PM

You think you can scare me or blackmail me by threatening to "investigate" me?
Don't make me laugh punk..

Quote from: nutildah on January 10, 2020, 02:39:11 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 09, 2020, 11:07:02 PM

Quote from: nutildah on January 08, 2020, 11:20:51 AM

He's not perfect. Neither are you.

Multiple instances of attempted blackmail and extortion is more than just being "not perfect". mosprognoz is not fit for DT for that reason alone.

OK, I have reviewed everything and am no longer including mosprognoz. That puts him at -1 now.

References: mosprognoz - Needs To Learn | Blackmail | Extortion
Related: Lauda DT1/trust statistics | Is Lauda still on DT?
Archived | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
IsMosprognozStillOnDT.tk

[Archived]

dragonvslinux

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 2213

Quote from: dragonvslinux on October 15, 2019, 12:43:29 PM

Edit: Negative trust was removed by choice of the user (not requested)

Negative trust again removed by mosprognoz, this time I managed to grab a screenshot (Oct 21st):

Quote from: mosprognoz on October 20, 2019, 05:14:15 AM

I tagged you for that before, but removed the tag [...blah blah...] you left me no more option, but to tag you again.

More feedback left:

Quote from: feedback

Continues to be unreliable and inconsistent with feedback. This user has now twice given and retracted similar feedback against me within 1 month. As a reminder, this user is not at high-risk of trading with, but it's therefore recommended to wait 30 days to see if trust left by this user is kept or removed.

Talk about being indecisive Roll Eyes

[Archived]

dragonvslinux

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 2213

Quote from: mosprognoz on October 20, 2019, 05:14:15 AM

I tagged you for that before, but removed the tag [...] I am sorry, but you left me no more option, but to tag you again.

For reference sake, the original tag referenced the above feedback: ie a referenced statement of facts from predominantly third-party sources.
Unfortunately I didn't manage to screenshot this feedback with the given reference, so can't prove this without the reference (that acts as evidence).
Good lesson in archiving and screenshotting your references folks! Just make sure to use them in the first place at least Wink

In a related matter, this user now received negative feedback:

Quote from: dragonvslinux on October 21, 2019, 08:56:44 AM

Therefore, as I previously explained, I would be leaving you negative feedback for your lack of willingness to be accountable for your claims:

Quote from: Feedback

Made serious accusations about a project without a single reference (msg52799029). The user was given a total of 72 hours to provide sources as evidence but was not capable of doing so, despite repeated requests (refs: msg52808483, msg52810914, msg52816768), as well as contradictory evidence. Clearly believes they can make unfounded accusations and use deflection tactics to avoid accountability.
(Continued) Neutral feedback left as this user is not at risk of trading with, but likely to make allegations without references that would be damaging to current or future scam accusations. Doesn't appear to understand that you can't make false accusations, even if a project is scam, or accused of such.

[Page Archived]

dragonvslinux

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 2213

Edit: Negative trust was removed by choice of the user (not requested)

mosprognoz, why the negative trust huh?

Quote from: mosprognoz

Deep-onion shill, untrustworthy liar.

Please be more specific next time, where am I shilling or lying? Are you trying to say the linked proof provided are lies??
PS - Yes I have supported the development in the past, similar to other altcoins, but that's far from shilling...

dragonvslinux

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 2213

1. All 40 rounds of airdrops were fairly distributed as promised, as can be seen from the following references:

Official airdrop log: https://deeponion.org/airdropslog.php
Airdrop stats from blockstats: https://blockstats.pw/deeponion/
Graphic airdrop stats: https://medium.com/@benezimpg/deeponion-airdrop-statistics-april-20th-81ff41c2c5b1

2. The Development and Bounty Funds are accountable through VoteCentral and block experts for full transparency:

VoteCentral reference: https://deeponion.org/votecentral/
Dev Fund explorer: https://www.blockexperts.com/onion/address/DeBb7ZwLaYnhYk5L6gwjzicdYGg8bQ4bq2
Bounty Fund explorer: https://www.blockexperts.com/onion/address/Dm485bNJaiGJmEVth2BnZ4Y1ygcufDsi4E

3. DeepOnion continues to be an active community-orientated privacy coin with regular updates and maintenance to core software:

Software releases: https://github.com/deeponion/deeponion/releases
Github contributions: https://github.com/deeponion/deeponion/commits/master

Any outdated and unfounded alleged risks of trading with this project, or it's representatives, should now be considered null and void.

Topic: feedback (Read 235 times)