Author

Topic: Filtering taint vs. shunning green (Read 2081 times)

sr. member
Activity: 410
Merit: 250
June 28, 2012, 12:10:04 PM
#4
Sorry I only skimmed through your 3 sentence post but I'm going to go with ... no.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
June 28, 2012, 06:45:49 AM
#3
Can I have your donation address?

*sends tainted satoshi*
I could alway isolate that from my wallet and not use it. That doesn't answer my questions.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
June 28, 2012, 01:09:27 AM
#2
Can I have your donation address?

*sends tainted satoshi*
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
June 27, 2012, 10:18:46 PM
#1
Since it appears that taint is detectable can I then presume that transactions from tainted addresses can be then ignored? If so, then if green addresses are forced upon a population, can they also be considered taint and ignored. Would it then follow that any tainted or forced addresses could then be forced into a forked block chain by those that oppose those practices?
Jump to: