So we all recall the red flags posted on many users accounts in the wake of the Bitcoin SV account on the forum. I would like to formally request these flags be removed as they were in clear breach of the rules around flags moreover they have a negative impact on users who actually have done nothing wrong the flags are complacently incorrect in there nature stating.
I refer to the 3 flags posted on my account by the Bitcoin SV troll who I now believe is banned from the forum.
The first flag claimed that dew to factors in a topic the troll believes that anyone dealing with me is at high risk of losing money?
This claim is complacently false and have no bearing on the post's that I have made in relation to this troll.
Second alleges that I violated a casual or implied agreement resulting in damages again this claim is 100% false.
I do appreciate the users who added there opposition to these flags but the fact of the matter is the flags are still able to be viewed on my account and they do have a detrimental effect even with full opposition to new members who many not understand the system it looks very bad.
I work very hard in the community here and have been a good member over the years with no issues i feel the blatant misuse of the system deserves some attention from the mods.
Please look into the matter as I feel it's a taint on my account for no reason other than some Bitcoin SV troll misusing the system to tarnish users who are in good standing.
I feel that after a flag has been opposed X=amount of times the flag should be removed from the account it's unfair to leave "inactive" flags on a users account when misuse of the system is clear and as such I request that the following flags be removed at the earlier opportunity.
Thank you for your time.
** Flags below for reference **
Bitcoin SV alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with MagicByt3 is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.
Support: Bitcoin SV
Opposition: owlcatz, LFC_Bitcoin, nutildah, ibminer, DireWolfM14, MagicByt3, Lauda, Timelord2067, BitcoinFX, examplens, IconFirm, dragonvslinux, SockyMcSockFace
Insufficient support.
Bitcoin SV alleges: MagicByt3 violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. MagicByt3 did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around December 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Support: Bitcoin SV
Opposition: owlcatz, LFC_Bitcoin, nutildah, ibminer, DireWolfM14, MagicByt3, Lauda, Timelord2067, BitcoinFX, examplens, IconFirm, dragonvslinux, blurryeyed, SockyMcSockFace
Insufficient support.
Bitcoin SV alleges: MagicByt3 violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. MagicByt3 did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around December 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Support: Bitcoin SV
Opposition: owlcatz, LFC_Bitcoin, nutildah, ibminer, DireWolfM14, MagicByt3, Lauda, Timelord2067, BitcoinFX, examplens, IconFirm, dragonvslinux, blurryeyed, SockyMcSockFace
Insufficient support.
