flag @Foxpup ,leaving negative feedbacks without trading ,Lauda gang member

TheBeardedBaby

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 3134

₿uy / $ell

Quote from: Bitcoin SV on September 15, 2020, 05:05:14 PM

Quote from: bitmover on September 15, 2020, 04:51:33 PM

Trust shouldn't be used only for trading.
If someone is abusing the system, promoting scam, suspicious activities, abusing using alts , etc they should be tagged as well. Like foxpup did.

Okay, then tag these abusers. We was never trading with anyone of them

Quote from: ?? on ??

Flag abusers (Part 1)

Flag abusers (Part 2)

The fact that your creator (I refer to BSV) cannot confirm his claims, and wants to present himself for someone who he obviously is not, is a sufficient reason for me to support the flag. This is exactly what the trust system is for, to mark all the conman.
No need to derail more the thread. You already have a place for the discussions, but of course is heavily moderated, wonder why Roll Eyes

posi

hero member

Activity: 2240

Merit: 579

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Bitcoin SV on September 15, 2020, 04:45:24 PM

Quote from: smartcontracts100 on September 15, 2020, 04:43:36 PM

flag @Foxpup ,leaving negative feedbacks without trading ,Lauda gang member

Support the flag against Foxpup here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=55384

He is part of the Lauda gang ,he is trying to scam people

Supported

Bird of the same feathers flocks together. Check the archive link which is strong evidence that feedback given to the OP is justified

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 2218

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on September 15, 2020, 05:12:20 PM

I just took a look at Foxpup's trust page, and the above image doesn't look like it's from his. You might want to clarify that unless I'm missing something obvious.

...
Edit: Ah, that screenshot is of Foxpup's received feedback. What relevance does that have to your accusation?

I confirm I placed that text on Foxpup's trust feedback page, it's the users' "untrusted" feedback. Evidence is not correct therefore I oppose the Flag.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Foxpup on September 15, 2020, 11:57:17 PM

Who exactly am I trying to scam and how?

Alt of game-protect confirmed.

Quote from: game-protect on November 12, 2019, 09:25:38 AM

Who did I scam and how?

Foxpup

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 3041

Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023

You don't always need to trade with someone to know that such a trade will only end badly. For example, and this may be just a hunch on my part, but for some reason I just don't trust (alts of) people who "will come to your door and beat you to death". Undecided

And if you think I'm "trying to scam people", perhaps you should elaborate on that accusation. Who exactly am I trying to scam and how?

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on September 15, 2020, 05:12:20 PM

The neg you got from Foxpup was because he thinks you're an alt of spy100. I don't know if that's true or not

OP admitted that, as well as ban evasion:

Quote from: smartcontracts100 on September 15, 2020, 10:21:03 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on September 15, 2020, 09:26:22 AM

Read this topic : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5275462 to see how suchmoon is and why that account banned

He is part of the Lauda gang ,they are trying to scam/extort bitcointalk users for money ... they targeted my @spy100 account ...

[...]

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3332

Merit: 6809

Cashback 15%

Quote from: smartcontracts100 on September 15, 2020, 04:43:36 PM

I just took a look at Foxpup's trust page, and the above image doesn't look like it's from his. You might want to clarify that unless I'm missing something obvious.

Lots of feedbacks are left without any trading having occurred between members. Obviously there's abuse that happens, but trusted members, DT or otherwise, usually leave negs to warn the community of unsavory members--and there's nothing wrong with that, as long as the feedback is true. The neg you got from Foxpup was because he thinks you're an alt of spy100. I don't know if that's true or not, but then you go on to this "Lauda gang" thing, which doesn't exist.

Nor is Foxpup trying to scam anyone, so you've got that wrong as well. If you think he is, you need to back that up with some hard evidence.

Edit: Ah, that screenshot is of Foxpup's received feedback. What relevance does that have to your accusation?

Bitcoin SV

full member

Activity: 626

Merit: 234

Quote from: bitmover on September 15, 2020, 04:51:33 PM

Trust shouldn't be used only for trading.
If someone is abusing the system, promoting scam, suspicious activities, abusing using alts , etc they should be tagged as well. Like foxpup did.

Okay, then tag these abusers. We was never trading with anyone of them

Quote from: ?? on ??

Flag abusers (Part 1)

Flag abusers (Part 2)

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 5622

Non-custodial BTC Wallet

Trust shouldn't be used only for trading.
If someone is abusing the system, promoting scam, suspicious activities, abusing using alts , etc they should be tagged as well. Like foxpup did.

Bitcoin SV

full member

Activity: 626

Merit: 234

Quote from: smartcontracts100 on September 15, 2020, 04:43:36 PM

flag @Foxpup ,leaving negative feedbacks without trading ,Lauda gang member

Support the flag against Foxpup here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=55384

He is part of the Lauda gang ,he is trying to scam people

Supported

smartcontracts100

member

Activity: 172

Merit: 19

flag @Foxpup ,leaving negative feedbacks without trading ,Lauda gang member

Support the flag against Foxpup here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=55384

He is part of the Lauda gang ,he is trying to scam people

Topic: flag @Foxpup ,leaving negative feedbacks without trading ,Lauda gang member (Read 193 times)