A US jury has returned a US$1.7 billion verdict against Ford Motor Co. involving a car crash that claimed the lives of a Georgia couple, their lawyers confirmed.Jurors in Gwinnett County, just northeast of Atlanta, Georgia, returned the verdict late last week in the years-long civil case involving what the plaintiffs' lawyers called dangerously defective roofs on Ford pickup trucks, lawyer James Butler Jr confirmed today.
Melvin and Voncile Hill were killed in April 2014 in the rollover wreck of their 2002 Ford F-250. Their children Kim and Adam Hill were the plaintiffs in the wrongful death case.
"I used to buy Ford trucks," Butler said on Sunday local time.
"I thought nobody would sell a truck with a roof this weak. The damn thing is useless in a wreck. You might as well drive a convertible."
Ford did not immediately respond to requests for comment. But in closing arguments, lawyers hired by the company defended the actions of Ford and its engineers.
The Michigan-based automaker sought to defend the company against accusations "that Ford and its engineers acted willfully and wantonly, with a conscious indifference for the safety of the people who ride in their cars when they made these decisions about roof strength," defense lawyer William Withrow Jr said in his closing arguments, according to a court transcript.
The allegation that Ford was irresponsible and willfully made decisions that put customers at risk is "simply not the case," another defence lawyer, Paul Malek, said in the same closing argument.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs had submitted evidence of nearly 80 similar rollover wrecks that involved truck roofs being crushed that injured or killed motorists, Butler's law firm, Butler Prather LLP, said in a statement.
"More deaths and severe injuries are certain because millions of these trucks are on the road," Butler's co-counsel, Gerald Davidson, said in the statement.
"An award of punitive damages to hopefully warn people riding around in the millions of those trucks Ford sold was the reason the Hill family insisted on a verdict," Butler said.
https://www.9news.com.au/world/ford-ordered-to-pay-over-1-billion-us-dollars-after-truck-crash-court/4b391438-8ca7-4af1-9a3b-96ff37dbfedc ....
$1.7 billion?! Is this what they refer to as a landmark case? Or are multi billion dollar fines becoming normalized?
There is a saying that says: "complete amateurs built noah's ark, while professionals designed and built the titanic". Depending upon declining standards, and tasks completed by the lowest bidder. There is a point where amateurs will do a job better than pros.
Has the task of constructing strong truck roofing become virtual rocket science in this day and age, given manufacturing and market conditions? Have automotive manufacturers sought ways to cut corners and reduce the weight of vehicles, reducing in thinner A pillars and roof support in order to extend MPG stats? Have massive increases in horsepower ratings contributed towards crashes becoming more deadly? Perhaps the interior ergonomics of indoor roll cages are not aesthetically pleasing enough for automakers to standardize them?
What is happening here?
