Topic: Forecaster rating (Read 319 times)
There are groups with which I work, there are only 3 of them, the rest I look at from time to time and evaluate the last 3-7 publications, I see how the information works, if interested, then I look at the rubrics more
Interesting project. I wish you good luck with it!
However I must wonder how will you rate the forecasters? The quality as well as the followers are usually of questionable origin. How do you see through the fake followers and scam groups? I see many such groups posting nonsense memes with absolutely no useful substance with a few thousand views while having many hundred thousand followers. The math does not seem to add up on those groups.
Perhaps if you used a method of prediction correlation from all those groups, you might develop your own system of forecasting?
However I must wonder how will you rate the forecasters? The quality as well as the followers are usually of questionable origin. How do you see through the fake followers and scam groups? I see many such groups posting nonsense memes with absolutely no useful substance with a few thousand views while having many hundred thousand followers. The math does not seem to add up on those groups.
Perhaps if you used a method of prediction correlation from all those groups, you might develop your own system of forecasting?
Yes, there are many selection criteria. Information is not easy to organize. Here is the current list, part with open access, part of the channels at the very end with paid access and therefore only their names are given.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bmabPRIVhXz75PllxwPUhK8moGW1pTTuXGkFADcffic/edit#gid=0
The work is not finished
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bmabPRIVhXz75PllxwPUhK8moGW1pTTuXGkFADcffic/edit#gid=0
The work is not finished
there is a lot to do here, although I don't understand the whole concept of what you want to do with this collection. and in my estimation, you have 6-12 months of testing each one individually. too much time, I don't know if you will manage to monetize and you will probably abandon it at some point.
if at some point this list of yours achieves a good reputation and gains trust, Do you want to accept for a fee to add some channels that you haven't tested or maybe they don't give good results?
you need to put some effort into the design of this table. First, you can't combine Russian and English languages in the same table, someone doesn't understand both or it can be hard to read. Also, the Telegram links to the channel, the logo, and the name of the channel can be much smaller or discreet, because there is no need to emphasize such things.
I must do a horizontal scroll to put away useless information and get to the one that is useful to me.
Initially, I wanted to make objective statistics, thereby drawing attention to the list.
I have my own tool that allows you to open a deal on the signal that appears in the channels automatically on the Binance exchange. I thought to create a small community around the list that use such channels and give their assessment and possibly discuss working methods.
Yes, there are many selection criteria. Information is not easy to organize. Here is the current list, part with open access, part of the channels at the very end with paid access and therefore only their names are given.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bmabPRIVhXz75PllxwPUhK8moGW1pTTuXGkFADcffic/edit#gid=0
The work is not finished
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bmabPRIVhXz75PllxwPUhK8moGW1pTTuXGkFADcffic/edit#gid=0
The work is not finished
there is a lot to do here, although I don't understand the whole concept of what you want to do with this collection. and in my estimation, you have 6-12 months of testing each one individually. too much time, I don't know if you will manage to monetize and you will probably abandon it at some point.
if at some point this list of yours achieves a good reputation and gains trust, Do you want to accept for a fee to add some channels that you haven't tested or maybe they don't give good results?
you need to put some effort into the design of this table. First, you can't combine Russian and English languages in the same table, someone doesn't understand both or it can be hard to read. Also, the Telegram links to the channel, the logo, and the name of the channel can be much smaller or discreet, because there is no need to emphasize such things.
I must do a horizontal scroll to put away useless information and get to the one that is useful to me.
There are hundreds of telegram channels with free and paid forecasts.
I have accumulated about 130 pieces, I am happy to add new ones. I want to give them an efficiency rating, I need an assistant in such a project.
There are a lot of campaign managers out there. These managers have good technical knowledge and experience in dealing with such channels so try to get in touch with them.
Yes, there are many selection criteria. Information is not easy to organize. Here is the current list, part with open access, part of the channels at the very end with paid access and therefore only their names are given.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bmabPRIVhXz75PllxwPUhK8moGW1pTTuXGkFADcffic/edit#gid=0
The work is not finished
There are hundreds of telegram channels with free and paid forecasts.
I have accumulated about 130 pieces, I am happy to add new ones. I want to give them an efficiency rating, I need an assistant in such a project.
There are a lot of campaign managers out there. These managers have good technical knowledge and experience in dealing with such channels so try to get in touch with them.
I understand! I need feedback on such an idea besides a helper. That's why I posted such a simple project here.
Finding an assistant is not difficult with the availability of payment!
Finding an assistant is not difficult with the availability of payment!
I don’t see the point in publishing a list of channels now, because without analyzing each channel there is no value.
I think you misunderstood. I didn't say you should publish a list of channels or any other type of lists. I suggested how you can find an assistant to help you with your project. That's what you are trying to do. The services board is the place to post various gigs, and if someone is interested in what you are offering, they can apply and contact you to become part of the project.
The fact is that the rating itself is a project. I don’t see the point in publishing a list of channels now, because without analyzing each channel there is no value.
But as soon as the analysis is ready, it will be interesting for the community here!
But as soon as the analysis is ready, it will be interesting for the community here!
Perhaps moving your thread to the Services board would be the best thing to do. You can do that yourself by scrolling to the bottom of the page and clicking on "Move Topic". After that just find "Services" on the list.
After all, you are looking for someone to provide you with a service.
Be advised though, that you are required to pay your partners in Bitcoin for the thread to be in the Services board. If that's not the case, the thread needs to go to the Altcoin board.
But you never mentioned in the OP if your future assistant will earn something from helping you?
After all, you are looking for someone to provide you with a service.
Be advised though, that you are required to pay your partners in Bitcoin for the thread to be in the Services board. If that's not the case, the thread needs to go to the Altcoin board.
But you never mentioned in the OP if your future assistant will earn something from helping you?
There are hundreds of telegram channels with free and paid forecasts.
I have accumulated about 130 pieces, I am happy to add new ones. I want to give them an efficiency rating, I need an assistant in such a project.
Jump to: