Forum PM Privacy | Bitcointalksearch.org

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: Pmalek on November 23, 2021, 04:54:36 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on November 22, 2021, 11:25:26 PM

A personal message is sent directly to a specific person, while a personal message is sent and is intended to be private.

I assume this is a typo and you wanted to say that "a private message is sent and is intended to be private."
They are both sent to a specific person unless you include additional users. They are both a private means of communication up to the point that someone makes them public.

Quote from: Quickseller on November 22, 2021, 11:25:26 PM

There is no expectation of privacy for a personal message. It would be similar to tagging a particular person in a message. The forum will not proactively disclose the message, but either party could potentially disclose the content.

A private message on the other hand has the expectation of privacy.

An expectation is just you believing that something will or will not happen. You expect and believe that a privately/personally sent message is supposed to stay private. They don't have to. They are private and personnel until someone makes them public.

Private or personnel message is just a name for the forum messaging feature. I would agree with you if the forum had both private and personnel messages. In that case, we would need a way to distinguish those two.
What if the on-forum messages were called Bitcointalk forum messages without mentioning the terms private or personnel? How are we supposed to look at them then?

Yes, that was a typo -- I fixed it.

Perhaps I should have written that there is no *reasonable* expectation of privacy for a personal message.

The current implementation of the PM system makes this clear. For example, it is trivial to Blind Carbon Copy a third party any PMs that you send, including when you include a quote of a PM you previously received.

I would say, in general if you need to use some kind of encryption key (such as your GPG key) to read a message, there is an expectation the message will stay private. If the message can be read without using any kind of encryption key, there is no (reasonable) expectation of privacy. Exceptions to the above would be if the parties agree ahead of time.

When you encrypt (or decrypt) a message with GPG, you know exactly who can read a particular message.

Findingnemo

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 793

Bitcoin = Financial freedom

Forum PM privacy is not guaranteed because admin can still access it that is what the actual reason for encryption is needed of we are sharing something which needs complete privacy.

But sharing anything which you send in PM for no obvious reasons other than which actually needs to be exposed then only the reputation of the user who is trying to scam you via PM.

Pmalek

legendary

Activity: 2730

Merit: 7065

Quote from: Quickseller on November 22, 2021, 11:25:26 PM

A personal message is sent directly to a specific person, while a personal message is sent and is intended to be private.

I assume this is a typo and you wanted to say that "a private message is sent and is intended to be private."
They are both sent to a specific person unless you include additional users. They are both a private means of communication up to the point that someone makes them public.

Quote from: Quickseller on November 22, 2021, 11:25:26 PM

There is no expectation of privacy for a personal message. It would be similar to tagging a particular person in a message. The forum will not proactively disclose the message, but either party could potentially disclose the content.

A private message on the other hand has the expectation of privacy.

An expectation is just you believing that something will or will not happen. You expect and believe that a privately/personally sent message is supposed to stay private. They don't have to. They are private and personnel until someone makes them public.

Private or personnel message is just a name for the forum messaging feature. I would agree with you if the forum had both private and personnel messages. In that case, we would need a way to distinguish those two.
What if the on-forum messages were called Bitcointalk forum messages without mentioning the terms private or personnel? How are we supposed to look at them then?

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: GeorgeJohn on November 20, 2021, 08:59:08 AM

Quote from: Pmalek on November 21, 2021, 04:10:32 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on November 20, 2021, 12:48:59 AM

A personal message is a way for you to send a message to a specific person. It is in no way a private message. This means the content can potentially be disclosed to anyone that is interested in the message.

Potato - potatoe. Whether it's private or personnel, it's still not a public message. If I send you a PM, it means that the content is something I didn't want to post for the general public to see. That's why I sent it to you and you only. Private/personnel messages that can identify a Bitcointalk user should not be made public. If the message contains something that is against the rules, you can report it, the admins will be able to see the content, and they will take the necessary steps.

If the message contains something worthy of a tag, it can be made public as proof that an individual is doing something that is frowned upon. Again, personally identifiable information should no be displayed even in that case.

A personal message is sent directly to a specific person, while a private message is sent and is intended to be private.

There is no expectation of privacy for a personal message. It would be similar to tagging a particular person in a message. The forum will not proactively disclose the message, but either party could potentially disclose the content.

A private message on the other hand has the expectation of privacy.

edit: fixed typo

skarais

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 2094

Publish a PM may not be the best way in most cases, but in certain cases I think it can be done to strengthen the evidence. So far I never thought I would do it for no apparent reason even though it's not against the rule. Under certain situation it is possible to publish a PM without publishing the sender of the PM, and I think it's the best way to keep someone's privacy if the message is an attempt to increase the knowledge of many other users. There is an option to report PM to admin if someone tries to commit scam attempts or other sensitive content, this is also the best option without needing to publish it.

krishnaverma

full member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 108

Quote from: Quickseller on November 20, 2021, 12:48:59 AM

A personal message is a way for you to send a message to a specific person. It is in no way a private message. This means the content can potentially be disclosed to anyone that is interested in the message.

The new forum has a specific requirement that the end user have the ability to share the contents of a PM with other forum users via a link. Only one user would need to consent in order for the M to be disclosed.

What do you mean by the new forum here?

Rizzrack

copper member

Activity: 783

Merit: 710

Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com

Quote from: Upgrade00 on November 22, 2021, 10:25:53 AM

Is there any way to actually allow a user access to only one personal message? I get you can report PMs and permit a mod or the admin to look at it, if that's what you mean.

There is no way to grant access to a single PM. They only way would be if there was a "share" button and the "known forum's key" signed the content of the PM and you can copy and paste the pgp signature. But that does not exist and seems too much of a hassle for way too little benefit.

Just report the PM and admins and global mods will receive a copy of the reported PM and take action if needed. That's the best and most straightforward option.

Upgrade00

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 2248

Playgram - The Telegram Casino

Quote from: Welsh on November 22, 2021, 06:59:54 AM

I wouldn't be giving anyone access to my account, regardless if they're on DefaultTrust or not. I'd much rather give them access to one personal message, instead of all my personal messages since it's almost impossible to look at your inbox, and only see one personal message due to the way they're displayed, so your unfairly exposing other users personal messages too, and of course then it's the security of your account.

Is there any way to actually allow a user access to only one personal message? I get you can report PMs and permit a mod or the admin to look at it, if that's what you mean.

Quote from: Welsh on November 22, 2021, 06:59:54 AM

Like I said only under excruciating circumstances would this be justified. Though, I also guess it depends on the context. Whatever that personal message says, might already be deemed public knowledge or something that's not considered private. Though, even then it's probably best to reference that personal message, instead of giving out personal details.

I agree that PMs are personal and should not be divulged except when absolutely necessary. I would personally not trust a user who randomly exposes what was shared privately.

tranthidung

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 4085

Farewell o_e_l_e_o

TLDR;

You can get full details officially there: https://bitcointalk.org/privacy.php

So the best practice is don't talk about things that can be used to dox you in PMs. For other PMs, you can delete them all after you finish the communication. As you can see from the privacy doc, there are different levels of destruction of PMs over time. That means you can not delete all things in the database after 1 click. It takes time.

Welsh

staff

Activity: 3304

Merit: 4115

Quote from: Upgrade00 on November 21, 2021, 01:28:40 AM

The point of posting PMs publicly is sort of a gray area, for one; they are not accessible to the public and except you allow a trusted member access to your account to view the Pm directly, no one can verify the authenticity of your claim. So, publicly posting personal messages of itself to either expose a scan or for whatever reason doesn't do much, as it's a copy and oastevorba screenshot, both which can be easily faked.

I personally would rather not expose a PM sent to me. It's personal to me and if they wanted it public they could have made it public. If however, I'm in a situation where I have to expose a PM to indemnify myself in a situation (like if I was accused of something), I'll only bring up the part relevant to that and have someone verify it.

Randomly exposing other people's messages to you is in bad taste in my opinion. And could be worthy of a tag (maybe a neutral ones) in some situations.

Even then, only under excruciating circumstances I'd say releasing a personal message is the right thing to do. I wouldn't be giving anyone access to my account, regardless if they're on DefaultTrust or not. I'd much rather give them access to one personal message, instead of all my personal messages since it's almost impossible to look at your inbox, and only see one personal message due to the way they're displayed, so your unfairly exposing other users personal messages too, and of course then it's the security of your account.

Like I said only under excruciating circumstances would this be justified. Though, I also guess it depends on the context. Whatever that personal message says, might already be deemed public knowledge or something that's not considered private. Though, even then it's probably best to reference that personal message, instead of giving out personal details.

Pmalek

legendary

Activity: 2730

Merit: 7065

Quote from: Quickseller on November 20, 2021, 12:48:59 AM

A personal message is a way for you to send a message to a specific person. It is in no way a private message. This means the content can potentially be disclosed to anyone that is interested in the message.

Potato - potatoe. Whether it's private or personnel, it's still not a public message. If I send you a PM, it means that the content is something I didn't want to post for the general public to see. That's why I sent it to you and you only. Private/personnel messages that can identify a Bitcointalk user should not be made public. If the message contains something that is against the rules, you can report it, the admins will be able to see the content, and they will take the necessary steps.

If the message contains something worthy of a tag, it can be made public as proof that an individual is doing something that is frowned upon. Again, personally identifiable information should no be displayed even in that case.

Upgrade00

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 2248

Playgram - The Telegram Casino

The point of posting PMs publicly is sort of a gray area, for one; they are not accessible to the public and except you allow a trusted member access to your account to view the Pm directly, no one can verify the authenticity of your claim. So, publicly posting personal messages of itself to either expose a scan or for whatever reason doesn't do much, as it's a copy and oastevorba screenshot, both which can be easily faked.

I personally would rather not expose a PM sent to me. It's personal to me and if they wanted it public they could have made it public. If however, I'm in a situation where I have to expose a PM to indemnify myself in a situation (like if I was accused of something), I'll only bring up the part relevant to that and have someone verify it.

Randomly exposing other people's messages to you is in bad taste in my opinion. And could be worthy of a tag (maybe a neutral ones) in some situations.

The Cryptovator

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 2223

Signature space for rent

Publishing PM in public fully depends on the situation are you facing. PM with private information including but not limited to name, address, or identity shouldn't post in public. A person who wants to trade with you really doesn't make sense to post in public. Either you should ignore or proceed if the deal isn't against forum rules or not against community standards. You can report admin if you receive a PM that is against the forum. You can post PM publicly if it's against community standards (like a scam). You shouldn't post PM publicly if the message included not to share with a third party.

However, I do not support tagging anyone for posting PM publicly.

DdmrDdmr

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 10802

There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain

Quote from: Little Mouse on November 19, 2021, 11:13:24 PM

<…>

On the forum, PMs are described as "Personal Messaging", as opposed to "Private Messaging" to which the acronym PM often refers to. I don't know if people make a technical differentiation based on semantics. I don't. Regardless, in either case, I’d personally consider them something that I’d not disclose, lest there be something really extremely grave enclosed (that does not mean it should go public either).

Account sales do not fall under that prism of a grave matter in my opinion, although I do recall seeing some related PMs disclosed from time to time (i.e. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sr-member-hero-legendary-member-account-seller-5188770 for example). It could easily warrant though a report to moderators for unsolicited PM spam, and some may even deem the Sender worthy of some kind of tagging as was discussed here yesterday (although pointing to the evidence would require disclosing the PM, which is a kind of catch 22).

There is, of course, no guarantee that the PMs won’t be disclosed, and that is something the sender should obviously take into account. PMs are not sworn to attorney nor clerical secrecy, but rather to what one considers to be rightfull, and probably self-restricted additionally in the eye of the expected community's reaction to unveiling a PM's content.

aoluain

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1362

Hmm interesting question,

Quote

But what if the PM includes offering of illegal trade regarding forum

I'm taking the question as selling accounts or merit swapping as the OP posted,
these two actions are hardly life threatening, I would agree with Lucius, just ignore the proposition.

If the requests become persistent then its definitely a case of reporting it.

mindrust

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 2442

Quote from: Little Mouse on November 19, 2021, 11:13:24 PM

People tagged other if they share/public their private PM which may contain confidential information. I would also hate to see someone sharing a private PM to the public if I wanted to share that information with only a few people.
But what if the PM includes offering of illegal trade regarding forum. It can be an offer to buy/sell account, or to trade merit. Should this type of PM be made public? I think yes but still looking for community response. Someone I know have been offered for such trades from a number of members.

In this situation it is best to ignore it I think.

If you reveal the PM's, you risk your own account. The guy who offered you a trade would get a negative rating too probably but this is a private conservation and I don't think anybody needs to know about it unless it is a crime. By "crime" I mean some serious shit like CP, drugs etc, even then we don't really need to know about it. You can directly report the account to the police.

GeorgeJohn

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 711

Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS

Quote from: Quickseller on November 20, 2021, 12:48:59 AM

A personal message is a way for you to send a message to a specific person. It is in no way a private message.

A Pm message should be a private message between you and whoever the message is directing to, because it's confidential message which is important to the sender and might be of no value to the recipient base on the content of the message, and assuming it's not confidential it would have made open for everyone to see and also engage in the conversation that supposed to be made secret, so I'm astonished when you said that a pm is not a private. So i want to know at least two cogent reasons while a private message is not [ private]

Quote from: Quickseller on November 20, 2021, 12:48:59 AM

This means the content can potentially be disclosed to anyone that is interested in the message.

So in this aspect of point, i will say that if anyone disclose a private message betweens both of you through a link or quote and make it public, their is atoms or an elements that is behind it, indecencies that they is collision between both parties or an argument that requires evidence to be proven that such conversation actually happened or took place, but that doesn't mean that it not a private message because at the period the chat took place it wasn't reviewed and made obvious to the public instantly.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Posting of PMs might be in breach of forum etiquette, but it's not against the rules (if I'm not mistaken), nor is it something someone should tag someone else for--unless, of course, that PM contained something that was agreed wouldn't be shared or has doxxing info in it, etc.

I've published PMs by shitposters begging to get their negative feedback removed before, and I probably shouldn't have done that and haven't done it since. However, if you send a PM to anyone here, you'd do well to not write anything you absolutely wouldn't want public, because you have no idea what the receiver of the PM is going to do. There's no right to privacy as far as those PMs are concerned, whether you like it or not.

If someone offers you some sort of illegal trade via PM, your best bet would be to report it to the mods. If it's from an established member with a reputation, that's a bit tricky. The community might need to know about stuff like that, depending on what the offer was.

Shamm

sr. member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 346

Quote from: Little Mouse on November 19, 2021, 11:13:24 PM

But what if the PM includes offering of illegal trade regarding forum. It can be an offer to buy/sell account, or to trade merit. Should this type of PM be made public?

If I were in your situation I have two options Post it in public inorder to be aware all user here in forum if it's against the rules and regulations in Forum. Cause If I don't do it, for sure he/she will persue his/her strategy and more user got the same message
or I will report it in admin so that they can take an action about this kind of situation.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

A personal message is a way for you to send a message to a specific person. It is in no way a private message. This means the content can potentially be disclosed to anyone that is interested in the message.

The new forum has a specific requirement that the end user have the ability to share the contents of a PM with other forum users via a link. Only one user would need to consent in order for the M to be disclosed.

isaac_clarke22

sr. member

Activity: 1610

Merit: 264

Yes, especially that you mentioned about "illegal trades regarding forum".
Even though the user can just be tagged directly with a feedback of "offers to trade merits/buy/sell accounts through PM", there are chances that a non-DT member would come across users like this and their feedback wouldn't be directly visible to many users.

Quote from: Little Mouse on November 19, 2021, 11:13:24 PM

People tagged other if they share/public their private PM which may contain confidential information. I would also hate to see someone sharing a private PM to the public if I wanted to share that information with only a few people.

If it contains sensitive information, just encrypt it just like the note says before sending a PM/DM

Quote

Note: PM privacy is not guaranteed. Encrypt sensitive messages.

Little Mouse

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 2100

Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse

People tagged other if they share/public their private PM which may contain confidential information. I would also hate to see someone sharing a private PM to the public if I wanted to share that information with only a few people.
But what if the PM includes offering of illegal trade regarding forum. It can be an offer to buy/sell account, or to trade merit. Should this type of PM be made public? I think yes but still looking for community response. Someone I know have been offered for such trades from a number of members.

Topic: Forum PM Privacy (Read 355 times)