Topic: [FRAUD] LEOcoin scam making demonstrably fraudulent claims to con general public (Read 24428 times)

Everyone knows Dan Anderson is fraud.

Read up on this!!  Here are some highlights

LEO Co-Founder whistleblows on LEO CEO Dan Andersson for:
     Financial irregularities
     Missing money
     Overselling LEOcoin
 

Andersson fires him to shut him up

See links below for court findings against Andersson.

Meanwhile, Andersson is detained in Pakistan on ECL without Passport for almost 1 year (on another case where he is accused of running a pyramid).

LEO indicates filing insolvency, see link!!!   

End result - LEOcoin holders get screwed.

LINKS:

https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/mr-a-kamran-v-learning-enterprises-organisation-ltd-3324933-2017

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c6a79eaed915d4a397873ee/Mr_A_Kamran_v_Learning_Enterprises_Organisation_Ltd__-__3324933-2017.pdf

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c6a79fde5274a72c19f7c73/Mr_A_Kamran_v_Learning_Enterprises_Organisation_Ltd__-__3324933-2017__-_written_reasons.pdf

Sure, if you think two or three years qualifies as 'asap'.

 

But, as I said, your perpetual pretence that you are not fully aware of the fraud perpetrated by this coin operation won't fly in court.

I have not created that website and it was adapted/corrected asap when I pointed this out to our team, so you just over exaggerate .. and no need to use sexually explicit language like fxxxing ... how shameless of you. 
Yet, I know and I accept that you disagree, so lets call it a day. I am sure the readers here have better things to do than to ponder about a coin that is listed at 365th or something place at CMC ...

Again, I refer you to my previous conclusion, you are shameless, utterly fucking shameless...

From the very beginning of this coin's inception it has been guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation

They explicitly lied about the technology of this coin, they explicitly lied about it being truly anonymous and they did so in order to intentionally mislead potential investors in it.

But I don't expect anything more in objective rebuttal than is evidenced by your last post, namely, your usual rambling non-sequiturs and desperate obfuscation.

Point to note, Roel, a court would view very dimly your perpetual attempts to pretend like you don't know this coin operation is guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation. They would likely find your utter refusal to honestly address the evidence being presented in your thread and repeated deletions of such as being indicative of your willing collusion in a conspiracy to defraud.

Don't believe me? Ask your lawyer.

Perhaps, cryptodevil, being shameless is an actual virtue of a cryptodevil ...   ... but fun aside ... you have a develish side ... granted.

As I stated above, I do not deny the facts as stated in the documents, so contrary to your false accusations, I - in reality - am 'intellectually honest'. And thus, deleting some post cannot be seen as rebutting these facts. The reason I delete trolling, is because trolls go beyond what is stated in the documents, and that is not presenting facts, but suggestive propaganda (founded on biased conceptions against MLM -  even when LEOcoin has been a genuine crypto coin from the start in 2014 - with a working blockchain, wallets and exchanges and with first PoW and now PoS algos, and not fully premined and centralized like e.g. XRP)

If you would attentively read my earlier reply above, I speak about: a) evident facts from public records; b) me not knowing much details about the subject of the case; and c) my promise to act, when relevant details become available. This shows, that I am not avoiding my epistemological duties at all, but in fact acknowledge that what we do know and have evidence for, but do not wish to speculate on that what we do not know (yet). This is what I regard as intellectual honest; not telling fiction or make up things, when you have no facts.

As with our discussion about anonymity, I also find your conceptions of 'intellectual honesty', 'evidence' and 'relevance' questionable. You are the one, accusing our project for years without a) ever bringing conclusive proof of LEOcoin not being as we claim on our website; b) trying to FUD as while acting as an anonymous self-acclaimed Don Quijotian cop - while I act in the interest of LEOcoin holders. LEOcoin is owned by those people, who have LEOcoin in their wallets and receive stake on one of the few coins, that has a higher price in BTC as at the start of the year.

It is not facts, I do worry about, but I do worry about trolls creating a shit storm based on mere speculation, while we - nor you, nor I - have factual evidence about your claims. LEOcoin holders are not interested in the where-abouts of officials - and most know this already anyway - but they are interesting in stable coin prices, good stake, the expansion of trading pairs connected to the move to the Ethereum chain and knowing that the team is working on such kind of things. From where ever they are at the moment.

You - and your other anonymous troll partners - are MLM-hating, biased one trick ponies, that act like saviors of the poor mankind, while in fact you are mistaking a community owned crypto project for that what it is not and in the process aim to destroy what we together have build up. If you do not like LEOcoin, don't buy them, don't own them, don't stake them. For the rest, I wish you all the best and I hope you get things sorted out in real life.

Remember, I am not selling anything here. And I am also not buying, especially not trolling that only wishes to destroy and harm LEOcoin. And that is the reason, why we had to start a moderated forum in the first place.

I don't want your apology, I want your honesty. But you have spent the last few years demonstrating your utter lack of such.

Evidence being posted in your thread is not trolling, it is the provision of factual and highly relevant information concerning this coin and those associated with it.

You know this, I know this, everybody in this thread knows this. But you are too intellectually dishonest to accept it and prefer instead to post lengthy meandering missives attempting to justify why you must, yet again, delete highly relevant facts from your thread because, put simply, you can't rebut them and they are likely to lead to people losing faith in the integrity of the LEOcoin operation.

You are shameless.

@cryptodevil

It is evident from the internet documents that the person stated on these documents is involved in a court case in Pakistan, regarding some topic I do not know details about. As he can work from there and the work on LEOcoin is not delayed, it is - for now - not relevant why he is there. When it becomes relevant, I will take my own actions - count on that.

You speak, that I would be part in some conspiracy, but from the start have yourself held this premise towards me and likewise attacked me. You - not very sportively - gave me bad ratings - even when I am not offering coins for sale - but simply, because you seem to have an issue. As your accusations towards me are not true, I take your statements for granted - you are free to post whatever you like. I am not some kind of self-acclaimed police and if it at the end turns out that you were right all along, I will apologize to you, but for now, I only can shake my head. And with regard to me having acces to the delete button, you are correct. In the forum thread, I did state, that trolling would be deleted. And it is.

Normally I would not respond to your slander, but as you like to get personal I write you back openly. I stand for who I am and what I do support. I write on this forum and not as a PR, because your lot, does not respect privacy and will publish my PR here anyway - and of course, anonymous ...

Maybe you are just such a sorry bitter person because you are not rich - or maybe, like Don Quijote de la Mancha, you like to chase windmills, but anyway, what is left to say? You have your opinion and I have mine. As I have more insight in LEOcoin and even LEO Ltd. as you have, I simply disagree with you. And, of course, for the sake of LEOcoin holders, I do hope you are wrong.

Regards - Roel


[/quote]

My usual response to this is to add another negative trust rating to him with a link to the relevant evidence post in this thread and hope that it might at least serve to warn some users. But as trust is not displayed on non-member forum views it's important that this thread and other LEOcoin articles on sites like behindmlm.com appear fairly high up in search-engine rankings.  Roel N. de Leeuw who controls the LEOcoin Foundation forum account is just as guilty in this conspiracy to defraud as the criminals at the top who are being pursued by various government agencies around the globe. His wholly dishonest approach to removing posted evidence of wrongdoing and misrepresentation by the scammers he supports, in some desperate hold-out over the last few years for some kind of epic Moon to occur so he can cash out his bags for Lambos, is despicable.This operation targets naive and desperate gullible people from impoverished societies and drains them of their cash in return for dreams of riches, all the while this scheme lurches from one bolt-hole, physically and virtually, to the next as it desperately attempts to postpone the inevitable outcome of all pyramid-style schemes.