If LN siphons off the majority of network fees, how will miners get paid?
Your premise wrong, and you have shown to the community you don't understand the subject you are referring to.
You didn't answer the question.
It was already explained to you that your premise is irrational, there is no way to properly answer your question.
to read someones white paper and quote them.. does not mean you understand or know the person behind it.
they were not friends. infact satoshi never talked to adam back.. all adam back got was an email from satoshi saying that satoshi quoted part of adam backs white paper as a small fraction of satoshi's idea/concept. and said adam is free to join.
adam didnt take much notice until years later AFTER bitcoin became a thing and satoshi moved on.
just like reading john Nash's white paper and watching a few youtube video's and a movie doesnt make anyone john nashes best friend, or someone that knows nash well or someone that understands nash
All BU supporters claim they know Satoshi's vision because they read the whitepaper.
Also, assuming you are not a fan of Adam Back, I should point out he was an original cypher punk (as I understand), and quoted in Satoshi's whitepaper, seemingly obviously trusted and respected by Satoshi.
Nonsense, as all your comments.
You can't assume that someone trust another only because it is quoted in some paper.
The only thing you assume is that Satoshi respects/trusts Adam Back's
Hashcash work.
Nearly all my posts are pointing out that others' arguments are not based on founded science, that can hardly be called nonsensical person with 20 posts.
When I am saying "trust" I am really referring to the synonymous relationship between intelligence and trust, Satoshi quoted Back as having a relevant partial understanding of the proposal.
This is in contrast to you and others that claim to understand bitcoin better than someone who was cited (and was asked to be cited) in the bitcoin whitepaper. THAT is a nonsensical baseless claim.
