blockchain is already male dominant and there have been times at conferences that many female attendees would be treated as sex objects. there have been reports of women being propositioned for sex when all they were trying to do was have civilised crypto conversations.
many conference spokes people such as andreas antonopolus refuse to go to conferences or events that do not treat females with professionalism and dignity.
i personally dont see much point in a calender of blockchain babes.. after all the dollar doesnt advertise dollar babes.
maybe if you have a porn site that accepts crypto.. you make a calender to advertise the porn site as accepting crypto. but no point turning the whole of crypto into a sexist gimmick
ok we can in this case depict the women completely different like some in an office hard working beuties
with all cloth on...
this way we can attract many beautiful women into the industry
actually it does the opposite
by depicticting office working females as sex objects is making perves think that any female in a suite should be propositioned.
what i meant was dont depict all crypto women as sex objects. but instead do it as a crypto accepting porn site calender. thus advertising the porn site that accept crypto. thus not generalising all women in crypto as sex objects.
EG
lets say someone wanted to sponsor an american football team. instead of just showing a crypto logo. it would show a logo for bitpay or coinbase.
EG
dollar isnt advertised. but a payment gateway for dollar is. such as visa or paypal, HSBC, bank of america
so if you want to advertise sexy women of crypto. you wont just do sexy women with a crypto logo, you would advertise the specific place peopl could find them. otherwise they will think all women are propositionable
plus it also helps you by advertising porn sites when doing a porn calender as those sites would pay you for making the calender because its advertising them. thus you get funds from the source (the models employer) and funds from those buying the calender.