"The flood gates to Europe will scream out with blood"!
Ok quote me so I can achieve the same epic death and be like a cyber Nostradamus.
Gaddafi was a smart dude but he was also a bit mad about certain aspects of life. Think thats one of the tell tale failings with intelligence is you are usually mad once you achieve a set level of IQ.
Its not hard to predict that people will eventually want a better life and see it some where else.
The grass is greener as they say and people will always flock to where the grass tastes like it has been moistened
in a monkeys ass for consumption later,or was that coffee beans? So confusing.
Topic: Gaddafi predicted the Europian refugee crisis (Read 1015 times)
So, this guy predicted the Paris and Brussels attack before his death?
Even a 3-year old kid could predict that terrorist incidents would occur in the European Union, if millions of third world immigrants from countries such as Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq are allowed to immigrate without any sort of screening or background checks. Paris and Brussels attacks are just the tip of the iceberg. Expect more.
So, this guy predicted the Paris and Brussels attack before his death?
Everybody predicted that long time ago. That's why I think there must be an agenda behind this "islamization project" in our neighbourhood. If no such agenda exist, and our leaders really this idiots, then we are in deeper shite than I ever thought :/.
So, this guy predicted the Paris and Brussels attack before his death?
There is no war without ground troops, according to US law, so Obama could attack Lybia without congress aproval.
And NATO worked as Islam Brotherhood allieds in all middle east with the Arabic Spring
And NATO worked as Islam Brotherhood allieds in all middle east with the Arabic Spring
Hmm.... let me see...
Egypt - NATO helped to topple the secular Hosni Mubarak, and replaced him with Mohammed Morsi of the Islamic Brotherhood
Libya - NATO toppled the secular Gaddhafi, and replaced him with hardcore Islamists
Tunisia - NATO toppled the secular Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, and replaced him with a government from the hardline Ennahda Movement.
Iraq - NATO toppled the secular Saddam Hussein. Now ISIS controls most of the territory.
Syria - NATO trying hard to topple the secular Bashar Al Assad. 60% of the territory controlled by ISIS.
Whitesugar,
interesting...
thank you for your long and complete answer bryant.coleman. I ask more!
1. I don't understand how the knowledge of reading makes you less an animal? for example if what you read has been doctored for your consumption...
2. why?
3. why?
4. how can "sometimes" democracy be imposed on people? demo - cracy, I am illeterate in greek but still...
5. does it hurts that all the so close friend of the tsar of russia are "great leader"?
6. what constitute the basis moral code underlying the so called secular law?
7. here is the problem with people like you, if I agree with you I am a hero, if I don't I am sick... you should, how can a plant of the earth be illegal? if the plant is illegal, aka has no value, no right to live, no place on earth, what makes you, and or your offspring have one?
8. I know that to reach this level of professionalism can cause jealousy.
9. the united states constitution solved this problem long ago.
10. this is the core of the conflict, why do you believe that inherently people can't achieve free will before being educated? feeding them under moving tank is what you call education? free will only presuppose the keeping of the soul.
interesting...
1. Yes. The majority of the people living in these nations are hard-line. The reason is that the majority of them are illiterate and uneducated.
2. That is not a viable solution.
3. NATO
4. Sometimes democracy can't be imposed on people, especially if they are illiterate and uneducated.
5. I am not Russian. So stop this BS.
6. Secularism is different from atheism. A secularist government doesn't allow religion to interfere in politics.
7. Consult a psychiatrist.
8. Once again, I am not Russian. So stop this BS.
9. Yes. I do have problem with groups such as the ISIS, New Tribes Mission and Al Nusra.
10. Free will can be a good idea, if the people are sufficiently educated.
2. That is not a viable solution.
3. NATO
4. Sometimes democracy can't be imposed on people, especially if they are illiterate and uneducated.
5. I am not Russian. So stop this BS.
6. Secularism is different from atheism. A secularist government doesn't allow religion to interfere in politics.
7. Consult a psychiatrist.
8. Once again, I am not Russian. So stop this BS.
9. Yes. I do have problem with groups such as the ISIS, New Tribes Mission and Al Nusra.
10. Free will can be a good idea, if the people are sufficiently educated.
thank you for your long and complete answer bryant.coleman. I ask more!
1. I don't understand how the knowledge of reading makes you less an animal? for example if what you read has been doctored for your consumption...
2. why?
3. why?
4. how can "sometimes" democracy be imposed on people? demo - cracy, I am illeterate in greek but still...
5. does it hurts that all the so close friend of the tsar of russia are "great leader"?
6. what constitute the basis moral code underlying the so called secular law?
7. here is the problem with people like you, if I agree with you I am a hero, if I don't I am sick... you should, how can a plant of the earth be illegal? if the plant is illegal, aka has no value, no right to live, no place on earth, what makes you, and or your offspring have one?
8. I know that to reach this level of professionalism can cause jealousy.
9. the united states constitution solved this problem long ago.
10. this is the core of the conflict, why do you believe that inherently people can't achieve free will before being educated? feeding them under moving tank is what you call education? free will only presuppose the keeping of the soul.
Gaddafi was cruel and a tyrant, but he was not dumb and was not indiferent to country's interests.
1. if the majority of the people there are hard-line Islamist, does it surprise you?
2. who is opposing the cutting in 3 of lybia? bengazhi - tripoli - the south?
3. who has interest to play a subtle nasty hand in making the situation there chaotic?
4. why is a secular government the panacea, specially if the majority of the people there aren't atheist?
5. justifying the rulership of the tsar of all russia by taking the king of africa as a justification doesn't lessen the "value" of the tsar?
6. what is secularism?
7. is secularism the genocide of plants that were living on earth before the bipeds came?
8. Are russians jealous to never have achieved a 0 casualty war?
9. do you have a problem with hardline islamists? hardline jesuits? hardline mormons? hardline Hindus?
10. How do you define free will?
question more.
There is no war without ground troops, according to US law, so Obama could attack Lybia without congress aproval.
And NATO worked as Islam Brotherhood allieds in all middle east with the Arabic Spring
This is called Divine Justice. 
The NATO is committing the same mistake again and again. They have over thrown secular governments all around the Middle East, and have replaced them with hard-line Islamist ones. This process started with the proxy war against the Najibullah government of Afghanistan in the 1980s. It has been repeated in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt.
The NATO is committing the same mistake again and again. They have over thrown secular governments all around the Middle East, and have replaced them with hard-line Islamist ones. This process started with the proxy war against the Najibullah government of Afghanistan in the 1980s. It has been repeated in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt.
1. if the majority of the people there are hard-line Islamist, does it surprise you?
2. who is opposing the cutting in 3 of lybia? bengazhi - tripoli - the south?
3. who has interest to play a subtle nasty hand in making the situation there chaotic?
4. why is a secular government the panacea, specially if the majority of the people there aren't atheist?
5. justifying the rulership of the tsar of all russia by taking the king of africa as a justification doesn't lessen the "value" of the tsar?
6. what is secularism?
7. is secularism the genocide of plants that were living on earth before the bipeds came?
8. Are russians jealous to never have achieved a 0 casualty war?
9. do you have a problem with hardline islamists? hardline jesuits? hardline mormons? hardline Hindus?
10. How do you define free will?
question more.
There is no war without ground troops, according to US law, so Obama could attack Lybia without congress aproval.
And NATO worked as Islam Brotherhood allieds in all middle east with the Arabic Spring
1. if the majority of the people there are hard-line Islamist, does it surprise you?
2. who is opposing the cutting in 3 of lybia? bengazhi - tripoli - the south?
3. who has interest to play a subtle nasty hand in making the situation there chaotic?
4. why is a secular government the panacea, specially if the majority of the people there aren't atheist?
5. justifying the rulership of the tsar of all russia by taking the king of africa as a justification doesn't lessen the "value" of the tsar?
6. what is secularism?
7. is secularism the genocide of plants that were living on earth before the bipeds came?
8. Are russians jealous to never have achieved a 0 casualty war?
9. do you have a problem with hardline islamists? hardline jesuits? hardline mormons? hardline Hindus?
10. How do you define free will?
2. who is opposing the cutting in 3 of lybia? bengazhi - tripoli - the south?
3. who has interest to play a subtle nasty hand in making the situation there chaotic?
4. why is a secular government the panacea, specially if the majority of the people there aren't atheist?
5. justifying the rulership of the tsar of all russia by taking the king of africa as a justification doesn't lessen the "value" of the tsar?
6. what is secularism?
7. is secularism the genocide of plants that were living on earth before the bipeds came?
8. Are russians jealous to never have achieved a 0 casualty war?
9. do you have a problem with hardline islamists? hardline jesuits? hardline mormons? hardline Hindus?
10. How do you define free will?
1. Yes. The majority of the people living in these nations are hard-line. The reason is that the majority of them are illiterate and uneducated.
2. That is not a viable solution.
3. NATO
4. Sometimes democracy can't be imposed on people, especially if they are illiterate and uneducated.
5. I am not Russian. So stop this BS.
6. Secularism is different from atheism. A secularist government doesn't allow religion to interfere in politics.
7. Consult a psychiatrist.
8. Once again, I am not Russian. So stop this BS.
9. Yes. I do have problem with groups such as the ISIS, New Tribes Mission and Al Nusra.
10. Free will can be a good idea, if the people are sufficiently educated.
This is called Divine Justice.
The NATO is committing the same mistake again and again. They have over thrown secular governments all around the Middle East, and have replaced them with hard-line Islamist ones. This process started with the proxy war against the Najibullah government of Afghanistan in the 1980s. It has been repeated in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt.
The NATO is committing the same mistake again and again. They have over thrown secular governments all around the Middle East, and have replaced them with hard-line Islamist ones. This process started with the proxy war against the Najibullah government of Afghanistan in the 1980s. It has been repeated in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt.
1. if the majority of the people there are hard-line Islamist, does it surprise you?
2. who is opposing the cutting in 3 of lybia? bengazhi - tripoli - the south?
3. who has interest to play a subtle nasty hand in making the situation there chaotic?
4. why is a secular government the panacea, specially if the majority of the people there aren't atheist?
5. justifying the rulership of the tsar of all russia by taking the king of africa as a justification doesn't lessen the "value" of the tsar?
6. what is secularism?
7. is secularism the genocide of plants that were living on earth before the bipeds came?
8. Are russians jealous to never have achieved a 0 casualty war?
9. do you have a problem with hardline islamists? hardline jesuits? hardline mormons? hardline Hindus?
10. How do you define free will?
question more.
Yes. That was their plan. Fasten Your seat belts.
This is called Divine Justice.
The NATO is committing the same mistake again and again. They have over thrown secular governments all around the Middle East, and have replaced them with hard-line Islamist ones. This process started with the proxy war against the Najibullah government of Afghanistan in the 1980s. It has been repeated in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt.
The NATO is committing the same mistake again and again. They have over thrown secular governments all around the Middle East, and have replaced them with hard-line Islamist ones. This process started with the proxy war against the Najibullah government of Afghanistan in the 1980s. It has been repeated in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt.
Well, this is one of the things that I do not understand, why do they keep doing this? They seem to be shooting themselves on the foot with this policy.
This is called Divine Justice.
The NATO is committing the same mistake again and again. They have over thrown secular governments all around the Middle East, and have replaced them with hard-line Islamist ones. This process started with the proxy war against the Najibullah government of Afghanistan in the 1980s. It has been repeated in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt.
The NATO is committing the same mistake again and again. They have over thrown secular governments all around the Middle East, and have replaced them with hard-line Islamist ones. This process started with the proxy war against the Najibullah government of Afghanistan in the 1980s. It has been repeated in countries such as Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Egypt.
He was payed and supportdd by the eu to control/hold the refugees in libya that wanted to cross the mediterran sea from there.
It is one of the hotspots, but then the arab spring came.
This whole refugee crisis started years ago and the eu knew it - they just ignored it for whatever reason.
It is one of the hotspots, but then the arab spring came.
This whole refugee crisis started years ago and the eu knew it - they just ignored it for whatever reason.
"In fact, some of these people would not be seeking shelter in Europe if their homes were not destroyed as a result of short-sighted aggressive Western policies." We still have more wars on east then ever before, I dont see some close end of all crises that comes from wars. Another quote, attributed to Gaddafi: "The Mediterranean will become a sea of chaos." A lot of boats sunken while they was trying to croos Mediterranean, coast guard saves as much people as they can but people still die. When will it end?
Millions of refugees storming European borders have definitely come as a surprise to Western politicians. They would not have, if the West only listened to what Libya's leader Muammar Gaddafi said months before he was brutally executed.
Source: http://sputniknews.com/world/20150917/1027135147/gaddafi-libya-refugees-exodus-arab-spring.html
Quote from: Muammar Gaddafi
There are millions of blacks who could come to the Mediterranean to cross to France and Italy, and Libya plays a role in security in the Mediterranean.
Quote from: Muammar Gaddafi
Libya may become the Somalia of North Africa, of the Mediterranean. You will see the pirates in Sicily, in Crete, in Lampedusa. You will see millions of illegal immigrants. The terror will be next door.
Source: http://sputniknews.com/world/20150917/1027135147/gaddafi-libya-refugees-exodus-arab-spring.html
Jump to: