Again this is false. You sat on the enquiry waiting for the result. The providor would have been well aware the game was being played as I became aware of shortly after contact.
It doesn't look good that you sat on this knowing that and that's my issue. You were aware the bet had hit and you choose to do what you did to your advantage. This was opportunistic by you guys.
I still firmly believe you owe me the $359 for this bet. I will post a case on ask gamblers forum and casino guru to investigate thoroughly. I don't believe this has been resolved at all and believe you weren't genuine at all in communications with this bet being aware it was always going to hit. Again you voided and cancelled the entire bet to begin with!
Then unfortunately you believe things rather wrongly. They don't owe you anything. You asked for the last leg to be voided, they inquired this to their team and got it granted, things were pretty much closed on that point.
You can't simply ask for one thing, got it granted, then ask for it to be revoked just because the previous situation offers better benefits.
I would also like to add I have had multiple bets placed in the past where you have underpaid me by significant amounts and I have had to get in contact with your support team to credit the extra funds. Would you like me to post the chat transcript of all these occasions? I am more than happy too? Please look into my account you'll locate those times also. I didn't make anything of it though as you paid me the money but it certainly isn't what a customer wants... to be undercut multiple times on sports bets and have to actually chase that money by contacting customer support.
Not to mention... having my rakeback rolled back several times also... do you want me to post about that? I was trying to keep this civil but you have failed to understand things from my point so I am happier to take this further and show further dealings I have had with you that have been negative.
Please do provide them, perhaps you have a case with those past betting history, perhaps not. The evidences provided by both of you will tell. One thing for certain, though, the situation with this three-legged bet, where you had it in writing that you ask the third one to be cancelled, is not a valid case.
Also I see contact at 4:10 and a response at 4:46. As advised game had well and truly been underway and your providor was well and truly aware of this. This is not resolved at all in my eyes. I wanted it simply solved amicably under the circumstances but looks like I have to go further into this and also show a history of incorrect payouts to further support my argument.. which I was trying to avoid in coming to an amicable resolution...
Once I can understand, even twice but multiple times it starts getting very suspicious in what the intent of your providor is.
I will also give an option of trying to resolve this in good faith by paying me $200 of the $359 in good faith but if you aren't willing to do that to resolve the issue and move on I will just go forward with opening those cases and providing further information.
Umm... question about this... timeframe. You previously
made a narrative that their team reached you with their update that they've voided the bet [with technical issue aside] way after the game was over, with them taking approximately 2 hours to get back to you, now with them providing their evidence, with time stamp and all, you acknowledged that the response is way below the original time-span you proposed, and now the game was "underway" instead of "had concluded"?
Did you not remember, or did it not even occured to you before that they gave a response approximately 40 minutes instead of two hours?