Author

Topic: Game Theory in Contract Enforcement (Read 1158 times)

donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
March 09, 2015, 03:36:53 AM
#7
Apparently this is the wrong forum. The Bitcoin 2.0 forums have discussions about these.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
March 09, 2015, 12:06:04 AM
#6
I'm exploring the notion of Bitcoin as a tool for smart contracts as they apply to online games. So far all online gaming is done through central servers. The rules for poker are clear and should be easy enough to program into a decentralized contract. The roles of the dealer would need to be enforced as well as the players so all players share equal stake and a dealer that quit would be penalized. Confederacy would need to be eliminated through randomization and anonymization. Thoughts?

Isn't this the basic thought behind ethereum? One of the uses of ethereum may be online gaming.
But where does game theory come into your question?
I suppose Ethereum could be used for the game design when it is released, but the cryptographic security would still require a staked cryptocurrency. Game theory is central to all decentralized and distributed operations. Currently only centralized solutions are used for the strategic decision making wrt gambling. They will require a consensus scheme that creates trustless fair play. Game theory also needs to deal with cheating and metadata, so additional security measures will be required. I'm sure there are other issues created by making games decentralized.

So far, nobody has come even close to creating such a device. Yet this may be a crucial implementation for Bitcoin acceptance as a technology.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
March 08, 2015, 07:47:12 PM
#5
I'm exploring the notion of Bitcoin as a tool for smart contracts as they apply to online games. So far all online gaming is done through central servers. The rules for poker are clear and should be easy enough to program into a decentralized contract. The roles of the dealer would need to be enforced as well as the players so all players share equal stake and a dealer that quit would be penalized. Confederacy would need to be eliminated through randomization and anonymization. Thoughts?

Isn't this the basic thought behind ethereum? One of the uses of ethereum may be online gaming.
But where does game theory come into your question?
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
March 08, 2015, 03:43:32 AM
#4
Forgive me for being naive, but why would bitcoin make that possible? Wouldn't you be able to do that without bitcoin?
Good question. I had never heard of smart contracts before the advent of Bitcoin. They are the foundation of Bitcoin 2.0 development. I would like to know how it can be done using decentralized and distributed provably fair consensus contracts outside traditional Tort law.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 526
March 08, 2015, 03:40:18 AM
#3
Forgive me for being naive, but why would bitcoin make that possible? Wouldn't you be able to do that without bitcoin?

The notion of bitcoin, to be precise. The idea is to use public-key cryptography for decentralization as I got it (so no need for central servers as such). The purpose is to make the game presumably more fair and also lower fees, if I'm not mistaken.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Loose lips sink sigs!
March 08, 2015, 03:29:11 AM
#2
Forgive me for being naive, but why would bitcoin make that possible? Wouldn't you be able to do that without bitcoin?
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
March 08, 2015, 03:02:49 AM
#1
I'm exploring the notion of Bitcoin as a tool for smart contracts as they apply to online games. So far all online gaming is done through central servers. The rules for poker are clear and should be easy enough to program into a decentralized contract. The roles of the dealer would need to be enforced as well as the players so all players share equal stake and a dealer that quit would be penalized. Confederacy would need to be eliminated through randomization and anonymization. Thoughts?
Jump to: