Get 201 merits in 2 months from a farm

Hamza2424

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1042

#SWGT CERTIK Audited

Quote from: hugeblack on April 03, 2024, 10:21:02 PM

In general, as long as many accounts can rank-up during allocated activity, I do not think a change should be made.

Hmm, Activity is the guardian, even though this is making things difficult for the spammers, but it makes me feel jealous haha maybe it would be making others as well but in a particular case, when I see a post with 26 merits despite its lackluster theme..

Honestly, if it's a meme, that's another story entirely (though you might disagree), still as I've got a lot of merits from memes in my early times but it still makes me feel jealous haha Grin

.

SamReomo

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 672

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Poker Player on April 13, 2024, 11:15:24 PM

This is further evidence that they have been caught and now they are trying to hide it. You're not overthinking anything, it's okay to keep an eye on them and realize this.

I think he/she/they have adopted the strategy of keeping a low profile to try to keep it from going any further.

I think you're right, they will keep a low profile for sometime. When everyone forgets about them then they might start trading merits again with a new strategy. I have also observed that not only the one who was reported stopped sending/receiving merits but also the ones who were trading merits with that guy. Let's see what strategy they will follow when everyone forgets about them.

Poker Player

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 2017

Quote from: SamReomo on April 13, 2024, 10:45:41 PM

I have noticed something strange about that user who was reported in this thread. After the report the user hasn't got any merits, and that's a quite strange thing.

I know that we can't really say that he/she's the one operating all those accounts, but it's strange that he/she hasn't got any merits in last 2 weeks.

Another strange thing is that the OP hasn't sent any merits after 3rd of April and that's the day when OP of this thread has created the thread. There's something shady or I'm overthinking?

This is further evidence that they have been caught and now they are trying to hide it. You're not overthinking anything, it's okay to keep an eye on them and realize this.

I think he/she/they have adopted the strategy of keeping a low profile to try to keep it from going any further.

SamReomo

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 672

Top Crypto Casino

I have noticed something strange about that user who was reported in this thread. After the report the user hasn't got any merits, and that's a quite strange thing.

I know that we can't really say that he/she's the one operating all those accounts, but it's strange that he/she hasn't got any merits in last 2 weeks.

Another strange thing is that the OP hasn't sent any merits after 3rd of April and that's the day when OP of this thread has created the thread. There's something shady or I'm overthinking?

jokers10

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 3049

Quote from: BlackBoss_ on April 02, 2024, 08:36:12 PM

Gormicsta beg merit from merit source and distribute it to his farm.

This one is using AI systematically, so IMO the chance that a bigger farm will be found behind this case is huge. When you see someone who doesn't bother to write posts and just uses AI instead that, it is usually so that there are more than one account. And if merit abuse is added... well, I feel that this case smells like a big farm of some cheater.

lovesmayfamilis

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 4265

✿♥‿♥✿

The addition of sources of merit is discussed here, when the topic itself shows that users have very skillfully learned to cope on their own. Why add another stream of merit so that the flow turns into a turbulent river of growing either alternatives or friends’ accounts, and maybe sales of these merits?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3573400

The speed of reading posts is simply Olympic. Grin

Especially jumping from date to date.

Although we declare that the issuance of merit should have freedom of action, perhaps such an overflow needs some kind of warning. Merit comes from somewhere among these users; therefore, there are many sources of merit, not insufficient.

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Poker Player on April 02, 2024, 11:59:22 PM

11 merits for that post that is written on page 3 of the speculation section? But if people usually when the thread is on page 3 don't even read the previous comments. I have written posts very similar to that one and I doubt very much that I have received more than a couple of merits, especially if the post is in the middle of page 3.

This is where things get very interesting.

You, I and a huge number of members have written a lot of posts on page three of a thread that has better content than anything in Speculation, yet merits would have been further than ever away. This does not mean by default that some form of skulduggery has taken place as far as what the OP has reported but it does not look good towards the names mentioned.

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on April 03, 2024, 01:41:16 AM

But here's the first thing that caught my eye.
https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=bc1qye6z4hvwp272ez3tjgnzw9l359kcaxpf7r4800

It is not the first time and will not be the last time we see multiple users using the same addresses. Those that decide to offer explanations after being caught out will probably drag their mums, dads, uncles, aunties, nephews, cousins, neighbours, colleagues and friends as a defence.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 3507

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: Rikafip on April 04, 2024, 11:35:09 AM

Quote from: Igebotz on April 03, 2024, 02:41:21 PM

Perhaps some of the merit source are inactive or not as active as they used to and that could be another argument for adding another set of merit source to replace those inactive ones.

Merit sources going afk happen all the time. For example one of the Croatian merit sources left forum last September and hasn't been back since.

I think I read somewhere that theymos recently replaced one of the inactive merit sources with a enw one but can't remember (or find) who exactly was replaced

The increase in the number of merit sources may be conditioned by the previous results. Perhaps a more detailed analysis would give a clearer picture of how the merits are distributed and the possible effects of that.

I assume that this statement is not just made up, maybe it is time to tone down the drama surrounding the new merit sources.

Quote from: icopress on March 24, 2024, 05:03:20 PM

At the moment, theymos is not considering anyone for the role of m'sources (I believe this will be the case for at least the next 6 months).

Rikafip

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 5937

Quote from: Igebotz on April 03, 2024, 02:41:21 PM

Perhaps some of the merit source are inactive or not as active as they used to and that could be another argument for adding another set of merit source to replace those inactive ones.

Merit sources going afk happen all the time. For example one of the Croatian merit sources left forum last September and hasn't been back since.

I think I read somewhere that theymos recently replaced one of the inactive merit sources with a enw one but can't remember (or find) who exactly was replaced

Learn Bitcoin

hero member

Activity: 462

Merit: 767

Instant cryptocurrency exchange with own reserves!

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on April 03, 2024, 01:17:42 AM

and Bangladeshi occupy leading positions in the exchange of merit within locales. But as long as you don't find any matches, you can't accuse them of farming.

I agree with that, and I must confess that I have sent merits to some of the locals just because they are my locals and to motivate them to write content in our local threads. Some of their posts deserved merits, but some of these members became abusers later, and I exposed more than ten of them. Since you have sent me a merit in my local thread post, I assume you read that with a translator. I stopped sending merits to them when I understood something bad was happening. They denied that they did anything, but as you know, they teleported to the other forum and did the same abuse there. That forum is centralized, and the admin checks everything manually. The local users in question got a red dot (similar to a negative tag) on that forum, and it was applied by the admin, proving they did the same thing here as well.

In this case, I assume they have a soft feeling for their local community member. It could be someone's alt that is known by most of their locals. This is just an assumption, nothing else.

hugeblack

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 4002

I added $weetne$$ to my ignore list but I don't see a strong connection between these accounts to be Merit farming.
Even if it were, I don't think it's a problem as long as there is no merit source. In the end, their generation of sMerits will be limited, and they will be added to the ignore list of many.

Quote from: Amphenomenon on April 03, 2024, 10:46:35 AM

The number of merits distributed by merit source monthly continues to drop, if you check the DdmrDdmr merit dashboard which is a clear fact that most merit source don't even use much of their allocated Merits because of low quality post and issues like this.

In general, as long as many accounts can rank-up during allocated activity, I do not think a change should be made.

Xiestar

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 2

Quote from: knowngunman on April 03, 2024, 07:20:24 AM

Quote from: Xiestar on April 03, 2024, 06:34:50 AM

@Hhampuz is always a victim of this merit circle jerk because he usually accept participants based on the number of earned merit counts alone.

This farmer buddies is having a sweet payday on Hhampuz arms. Not only from this locale but in general. Usual pattern is WO, All merit source thread and local merit thread. There’s a lot of this gang. Check this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=886039. Some user that gave him merit woke up just to send him a merit.

I don't know where you derive your conclusion from but I know is that Hhampuz is not just after high merits but also standard and other requirements necessary. I observe that it is a coincidence where users with high number of merits meet with his requirements and he's satisfied working with them. Take a look at his last slot filled https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63883831 that user was not the one with highest merits but he's picked. Don't make it sound as if Hhampuz is the reason for merit farming here. After checking the comments on your neutral tag, I know the reason why it was there.

There’s a lot of instances and you are one of this user that benefited on this merit circle jerking. You only sighted an exception but most of the time those high merits got accepted. You are one of those user that has a post on middle page yet you receive merit out of nowhere from your gang.

Also the posting pattern of “want something” on bitcoin discussion or beginners & help is your gang favorite post because merit source preferred this dramatic post.

Quote from: Amphenomenon on April 03, 2024, 10:46:35 AM

I don't really think this would actually help because majority of these merits were not distributed by merit source and so it doesn't really solve the problem.

Not distributed by merit source yet most of the smerit sender merit came from merit source by doing same post pattern. Most of this jerker is on Duelbits and Rollbit.

SamReomo

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 672

Top Crypto Casino

It's quite strange to see that how a user could get so many merits with such quality posts within two months, but he's not the only user getting such high number of merits. There are other users who despite making normal quality posts get many merits. While there are also those members that make good quality posts but get few merits of the posts. The strange thing that I have observed about this particular member is that someone of his/her merits come from low rank members but that's not enough to consider him/her as a merit farmer.

I have noticed that from last few months even the good members of the forum who make high quality, and full of value posts aren't getting enough merits, but still there are some members of the local boards that are getting good number of merits for their normal quality posts. It's a sMerit senders choice to either send someone a merit or not, and most probably it would be wrong to take any action against that user because the ones who sent him those merits are also active members of the forum.

Igebotz

staff

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1610

The Naija & BSFL Sherrif 📛

Quote from: Rikafip on April 03, 2024, 11:05:14 AM

Quote from: Amphenomenon on April 03, 2024, 10:46:35 AM

The number of merits distributed by merit source monthly continues to drop, if you check the DdmrDdmr merit dashboard which is a clear fact that most merit source don't even use much of their allocated Merits because of low quality post and issues like this.

If merit sources are unable to empty their monthly allocation due not enough quality posts, isn't that another argument for reducing the amount of merit that is generated each month?

Last time theymos did a big merit readjustment was ~July 2021 and since then number of posts dropped by 40-50% while amount of merit shared didn't drop that much, which then brings us to these kind of situations.

Perhaps some of the merit source are inactive or not as active as they used to and that could be another argument for adding another set of merit source to replace those inactive ones. There's always two side to look at for every situation.

Amphenomenon

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 470

Hope Jeremiah 17vs7

Quote from: Rikafip on April 03, 2024, 11:05:14 AM

Quote from: Amphenomenon on April 03, 2024, 10:46:35 AM

The number of merits distributed by merit source monthly continues to drop, if you check the DdmrDdmr merit dashboard which is a clear fact that most merit source don't even use much of their allocated Merits because of low quality post and issues like this.

If merit sources are unable to empty their monthly allocation due not enough quality posts, isn't that another argument for reducing the amount of merit that is generated each month?

Yes it may be reduced base on this reason and not the other. To be frank while others may need this reduction some actually deserves more especially in the LB or maybe what they may need will be a new merit source but I doubt Theymos might consider this especially with issues relating to this going on.

Quote

Last time theymos did a big merit readjustment was ~July 2021 and since then number of posts dropped by 40-50% while amount of merit shared didn't drop that much, which then brings us to these kind of situations.

Oh to be frank I was not aware of this since I joined the forum around September 2022 but became active 2023

Rikafip

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 5937

Quote from: Amphenomenon on April 03, 2024, 10:46:35 AM

The number of merits distributed by merit source monthly continues to drop, if you check the DdmrDdmr merit dashboard which is a clear fact that most merit source don't even use much of their allocated Merits because of low quality post and issues like this.

If merit sources are unable to empty their monthly allocation due not enough quality posts, isn't that another argument for reducing the amount of merit that is generated each month?

Last time theymos did a big merit readjustment was ~July 2021 and since then number of posts dropped by 40-50% while amount of merit shared didn't drop that much, which then brings us to these kind of situations.

Amphenomenon

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 470

Hope Jeremiah 17vs7

Quote from: Rikafip on April 03, 2024, 10:22:23 AM

Quote from: Lucius on April 03, 2024, 10:08:12 AM

In that case, the system should be modified to complicate such merit abuse as much as possible

The easiest way possible I can think of is to reduce the overall amount of merit that merit sources get each month.

I didn't think that I will ever say this, but maybe we reach the point where there's too much merit going around for this amount of quality posts, which then makes it very easy for shitposters like the one mentioned in OP to advance through ranks.

I don't really think this would actually help because majority of these merits were not distributed by merit source and so it doesn't really solve the problem.

The number of merits distributed by merit source monthly continues to drop, if you check the DdmrDdmr merit dashboard which is a clear fact that most merit source don't even use much of their allocated Merits because of low quality post and issues like this.

While some of these Merit source may actually just store them others in the WO, just spend it on those who they know won't abuse there and it's quite annoying when I see post about criticism about how spent their sMerits where as most of the merit sources there are still actively distributing merit across each boards to quality posts.

Rikafip

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 5937

Quote from: Lucius on April 03, 2024, 10:08:12 AM

In that case, the system should be modified to complicate such merit abuse as much as possible

The easiest way possible I can think of is to reduce the overall amount of merit that merit sources get each month.

I didn't think that I will ever say this, but maybe we reach the point where there's too much merit going around for this amount of quality posts, which then makes it very easy for shitposters like the one mentioned in OP to advance through ranks.

Lucius

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 5637

Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲

Quote from: LoyceV on April 03, 2024, 06:08:30 AM

Quote from: Lucius on April 03, 2024, 05:19:10 AM

let's say the maximum number of merits that someone can receive from an individual user should be reduced from 50 to say 30 (or less) in one month. This would not solve the problem, but it would slow down the progress of those trying to outwit the system.

I doubt that's going to change anything. If they have more than 30 sMerit per month, they'll just make their circle of "friends" bigger.

In that case, the system should be modified to complicate such merit abuse as much as possible, but I have no doubt that those who want to do something will always find a way. It will be interesting to see if any of those called will express themselves about their "merits activities", which of course is not an obligation, but silence is sometimes louder than words.

knowngunman

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 364

Quote from: Xiestar on April 03, 2024, 06:34:50 AM

@Hhampuz is always a victim of this merit circle jerk because he usually accept participants based on the number of earned merit counts alone.

This farmer buddies is having a sweet payday on Hhampuz arms. Not only from this locale but in general. Usual pattern is WO, All merit source thread and local merit thread. There’s a lot of this gang. Check this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=886039. Some user that gave him merit woke up just to send him a merit.

I don't know where you derive your conclusion from but I know is that Hhampuz is not just after high merits but also standard and other requirements necessary. I observe that it is a coincidence where users with high number of merits meet with his requirements and he's satisfied working with them. Take a look at his last slot filled https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63883831 that user was not the one with highest merits but he's picked. Don't make it sound as if Hhampuz is the reason for merit farming here. After checking the comments on your neutral tag, I know the reason why it was there.

Quote from: #Greatest on April 03, 2024, 01:44:54 AM

I understand that success always draws attention of other people so it's obvious. Like lovemayfamilies said go check out the Bangladesh, Pakistan local then you would see post that says HI or HELLO receive merits and also have you seen the WO thread.

LOL this is not surprising to me because I have seen campaign applications receiving merits too. The fact remains that some local are being central of attention while where real abuse is taking place are ignored.

$weetne$$

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 227

Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook

Quote from: BlackBoss_ on April 02, 2024, 08:36:12 PM

Check with https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector
48% likely this comes from GPT-3, GPT-4 or ChatGPT.

See $weetne$$ sends merit to. Wait for merit source like fillippone, JayJuanGee, The Sceptical Chymist and if merit source merit a post, he will send merit to that post, friends join with more merit.

Hello BlackBoss and everyone please I don't have a farm and I don't use AI to post. I write from my own little thinking and everything that I write is from how I understood the topic. The results is showing less than 50% because everything that I'm writing is from my own thinking and what helps me to have this thoughts is because of the research that I have been doing. I don't like bots and I don't use chatgpt or any of the AI writing bots therefore please don't make it look like I'm using a bot. I'm not yet very good but with time I'll be better. I have sent merit to different people and not only those that are merited by the merit source. Post that are merited by merit source are post of high quality therefore I don't think I'm wrong meriting them. Please correct me if I'm wrong as I love to learn everyday.

Quote from: LoyceV on April 03, 2024, 03:29:08 AM

Quote from: BlackBoss_ on April 02, 2024, 08:36:12 PM

Is $weetne$$ a very good poster to earn 201 merit in 60 days with 150 post?

Nope, it's a shitposter and I've added him to my ignore list. Those generic posts in broken English aren't worth reading.

I'm sorry as I never thought I was one but thank you for pointing that out. I'll work on my post more and maybe in the future I will be able to get myself out of your ignored list. I don't want to look like a bad egg on the forum. More thoughts will be put into my posting. Thank you for the feedback.

Xiestar

jr. member

Activity: 66

Merit: 2

@Hhampuz is always a victim of this merit circle jerk because he usually accept participants based on the number of earned merit counts alone.

This farmer buddies is having a sweet payday on Hhampuz arms. Not only from this locale but in general. Usual pattern is WO, All merit source thread and local merit thread. There’s a lot of this gang. Check this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=886039. Some user that gave him merit woke up just to send him a merit.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Lucius on April 03, 2024, 05:19:10 AM

let's say the maximum number of merits that someone can receive from an individual user should be reduced from 50 to say 30 (or less) in one month. This would not solve the problem, but it would slow down the progress of those trying to outwit the system.

I doubt that's going to change anything. If they have more than 30 sMerit per month, they'll just make their circle of "friends" bigger.

Lucius

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 5637

Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲

Regardless of whether they are friends from the local board, the way merits are distributed indicates that this is a lot of alt accounts or "friends" communicate in the way "I wrote a good post, please check and give merits". It is absolutely certain that it is not a coincidence, because when someone gets 10+ merits on the third page of the topic in the Speculation board for a post that is not special in any way, it is not something that should be considered ordinary.

What also attracts attention is the fact that the merits were given by one user in very short intervals, which clearly shows that the person giving the merits did not read those posts at all.

Quote from: LoyceV on April 03, 2024, 03:29:08 AM

~snip~
It looks like someone found a way to still rank up shitposters despite the Merit system. He's close to Sr. Member now. Maybe we should raise the Merit requirements for those ranks Cheesy

The merit system is not perfect, but without it shitposters and alt farms would have a much easier job. My opinion is that the merit system should be slightly adjusted, so let's say the maximum number of merits that someone can receive from an individual user should be reduced from 50 to say 30 (or less) in one month. This would not solve the problem, but it would slow down the progress of those trying to outwit the system.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: BlackBoss_ on April 02, 2024, 08:36:12 PM

Is $weetne$$ a very good poster to earn 201 merit in 60 days with 150 post?

Nope, it's a shitposter and I've added him to my ignore list. Those generic posts in broken English aren't worth reading.

It looks like someone found a way to still rank up shitposters despite the Merit system. He's close to Sr. Member now. Maybe we should raise the Merit requirements for those ranks Cheesy

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 3507

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: #Greatest on April 03, 2024, 01:44:54 AM

I don't really understand the context for this thread or may I missing something, so they added new rules that doesn't permit a post to receive more than a specific number of merits ?

I don't know if this is your rhetorical question or if you really want someone to explain to you to understand better.
It is not about any limits on the number of merits per post, it is already a matter of doubting the manipulation of the merit system and its organized merit exchange. Those are not things we like to see here.

#Greatest

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 2

I don't really understand the context for this thread or may I missing something, so they added new rules that doesn't permit a post to receive more than a specific number of merits ?

Secondly, how is this related to agbe winning the pie contest ? I really don't get the problem , if his pie wasn't worthy then why was it pick to be in the pool selection in the first place? And moreover there is a reason it's called voting, it's a free choice of vote so far as the pie itself is pick or you can better explain how voting works.

I understand that success always draws attention of other people so it's obvious. Like lovemayfamilies said go check out the Bangladesh, Pakistan local then you would see post that says HI or HELLO receive merits and also have you seen the WO thread.

lovesmayfamilis

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 4265

✿♥‿♥✿

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on April 03, 2024, 01:24:40 AM

Hey lovesmayfamilis, I don't know if you have any personal issues with the OP, but I'm surprised you would say that. For starters, the posts he quoted are not from local boards. I know how merit 'exchanges' work on local boards and he's not talking about that here.

That account has received an unusually high number of merits for those posts, which have not been given on a local board, and although from what has been presented there is no conclusive evidence that they are part of a farm they seem to me to be strange behavior to say the least.

The exchange of merit was carried out by people from the same locale. Which means they can be friends. Isn't it obvious? I see the speed with which merits were distributed. One can understand that it is impossible to even read during this time, let alone comprehend those posts for which merits were posted. I argue that these cases were planned, but at the same time, how do you want to blame them? Transfer of merits to whom? How? That's why I write that distributing merit exclusively among your friends until it proves an alternative connection is highly condemned by the community. If the connection between these accounts is proven, then the conversation may take a different direction.

But here's the first thing that caught my eye.
https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=bc1qye6z4hvwp272ez3tjgnzw9l359kcaxpf7r4800

Why do you see my attitude towards the OP? I have a good relationship with him.

Don Pedro Dinero

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1565

The first decentralized crypto betting platform

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on April 03, 2024, 01:17:42 AM

OP, why only these guys? Merit exchange exists in any locale. Nigerian, Indonesian, and Bangladeshi occupy leading positions in the exchange of merit within locales. But as long as you don't find any matches, you can't accuse them of farming. The fact that these people may know each other is certain, but this is not a violation. The forum does not provide for how much merit to distribute to whom, and nothing is surprising here either.

But, of course, this behavior is wrong. And those people who will read your accusation today should think about this. You are in a community that you want to receive feedback from, but by acting selfishly, you will end up receiving a boomerang of indifference from the community.

Hey lovesmayfamilis, I don't know if you have any personal issues with the OP, but I'm surprised you would say that. For starters, the posts he quoted are not from local boards. I know how merit 'exchanges' work on local boards and he's not talking about that here.

That account has received an unusually high number of merits for those posts, which have not been given on a local board, and although from what has been presented there is no conclusive evidence that they are part of a farm they seem to me to be strange behavior to say the least.

lovesmayfamilis

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 4265

✿♥‿♥✿

OP, why only these guys? Merit exchange exists in any locale. Nigerian, Indonesian, and Bangladeshi occupy leading positions in the exchange of merit within locales. But as long as you don't find any matches, you can't accuse them of farming. The fact that these people may know each other is certain, but this is not a violation. The forum does not provide for how much merit to distribute to whom, and nothing is surprising here either.

But, of course, this behavior is wrong. And those people who will read your accusation today should think about this.

You are in a community that you want to receive feedback from, but by acting selfishly, you will end up receiving a boomerang of indifference from the community.

Plaguedeath

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 663

@OP I absolutely agree with you and I believe they're either controlled by one person or they're friends who make secret agreement without we know it.

Unfortunately, I expect people will disagree with you because they will give many reasons:
1. There are no solid evidence.
2. Merit is subjective and then quoted this message.

Quote from: theymos on October 21, 2018, 09:28:55 AM

If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer.

If I had demerit, I would give him 200 demerit, he's only deserved to be a Jr. Member rank right now.

Quote from: BlackBoss_ on April 02, 2024, 08:36:12 PM

11 merited post

Quote from: $weetne$$ on February 13, 2024, 08:19:18 PM

For the short term, Bitcoin trading at $50,000 isn't good as many traders will begin to take profits and this will bring selling pressure that'll make Bitcoin to drop in price. A sign to know when to take profit for traders or those that are investing for the short term is when Bitcoin starts getting to many praises and we're not in the bull market season. The hype will make traders and Investors to start taking profits. Another sign is when your exit target has been reached. If you had a target to sell at $50,000, you should sell and not allow other to convince you. Many people will always be saying Bitcoin will continue rising but Bitcoin takes a break after rising for sometime and I think we're around that period that Bitcoin will experience a correction therefore my advice isn't for holders but traders.

The conclusion of this post is "It's not good to sell Bitcoin at $50K, but if you want, then go for it", the fuck it can received 11 merits.

Prove me wrong they're not Nigerians.

A bit off topic, do people agree if this entry can take the third position?

Check the full list, I would like to hear a solid explanation why this entry deserved to win among other pies.

Quote from: Agbe on March 13, 2024, 05:57:58 PM

Quote from: Poker Player on April 02, 2024, 11:59:22 PM

11 merits for that post that is written on page 3 of the speculation section? But if people usually when the thread is on page 3 don't even read the previous comments. I have written posts very similar to that one and I doubt very much that I have received more than a couple of merits, especially if the post is in the middle of page 3.

I think this is what they see on their screen.

Poker Player

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 2017

You're right that it looks weird. There are too many merits in such a short time, and although the posts are OK and are worthy of some merits it's not normal to receive so many, for example in the speculation threads you don't usually receive many merits. Let's see this one:

Quote from: BlackBoss_ on April 02, 2024, 08:36:12 PM

Another merited post in question, 26 merits.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5482609

Quote from: ?? on ??

Bitcoin dip below $40,000 yesterday which most people thought was going to be the support or lowest price of the market as we were all bullish after Bitcoin ETF got approval from the security & exchange commission. The price of Bitcoin has recovered to trading above $40,000 but it might dip again therefore I'm writing this thread to advice the forum members not to panic. I haven't been too long in the industry as I started my journey recently but during my research and comparing Bitcoin prices before and after the halving, I noticed Bitcoin has never crossed the ATH before the halving but many people are thinking it'll do that this year rather I noticed that it always dips before the halving and that what is happening to the market therefore we shouldn't not be alarmed, this is what happens always from the history of Bitcoin and history always repeats in the market. Lets be guided and don't lose faith as the market is only dipping not crashing.

Although one of those who gives it a merit is DdmrDdmr, who I doubt very much is part of any farm at all, 26 merits for that OP seems clearly too many for what is usually given in that section.

Another one that draws even more attention:

Quote from: $weetne$$ on February 13, 2024, 08:19:18 PM

For the short term, Bitcoin trading at $50,000 isn't good as many traders will begin to take profits and this will bring selling pressure that'll make Bitcoin to drop in price. A sign to know when to take profit for traders or those that are investing for the short term is when Bitcoin starts getting to many praises and we're not in the bull market season. The hype will make traders and Investors to start taking profits. Another sign is when your exit target has been reached. If you had a target to sell at $50,000, you should sell and not allow other to convince you. Many people will always be saying Bitcoin will continue rising but Bitcoin takes a break after rising for sometime and I think we're around that period that Bitcoin will experience a correction therefore my advice isn't for holders but traders.

11 merits for that post that is written on page 3 of the speculation section? But if people usually when the thread is on page 3 don't even read the previous comments. I have written posts very similar to that one and I doubt very much that I have received more than a couple of merits, especially if the post is in the middle of page 3.

BlackBoss_

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 387

Rollbit is for you. Take $RLB token!

The user in question
$weetne$$

BPIP

Quote from: $weetne$$ on August 05, 2023, 12:03:01 AM

You didn't understand my thoughts, tokens can be traded on both centralized exchange and all decentralized exchange on the blockchain they're operating from. An example is tokens on Ethereum blockchain, all tokens that was created on Ethereum blockchain can be traded on the blockchain and they also get the opportunity to trade on centralized exchange which increase the exchange they can be traded on. But coins can't trade on Ethereum decentralized exchange except only Ethereum which is a coin and parent coin of the blockchain. Both coins and tokens can find it hard to get listed on popular exchange therefore this isn't a point, some times tokens get more advantage to be listed on centralized exchange since they can be easier implemented on the exchange but coins can't. Also coins don't get much interest from traders or investors since how to store them isn't known yet but tokens on Binance or Ethereum blockchain can be stored on popular wallets so investors and traders pick interest in them more. I'm putting into consideration if both the token and coins has similar popularity.

Check with https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector
48% likely this comes from GPT-3, GPT-4 or ChatGPT.

That post received 7 merits.

Another merited post in question, 26 merits.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5482609

Quote from: ?? on ??

Bitcoin dip below $40,000 yesterday which most people thought was going to be the support or lowest price of the market as we were all bullish after Bitcoin ETF got approval from the security & exchange commission. The price of Bitcoin has recovered to trading above $40,000 but it might dip again therefore I'm writing this thread to advice the forum members not to panic. I haven't been too long in the industry as I started my journey recently but during my research and comparing Bitcoin prices before and after the halving, I noticed Bitcoin has never crossed the ATH before the halving but many people are thinking it'll do that this year rather I noticed that it always dips before the halving and that what is happening to the market therefore we shouldn't not be alarmed, this is what happens always from the history of Bitcoin and history always repeats in the market. Lets be guided and don't lose faith as the market is only dipping not crashing.

6 merited post

Quote from: $weetne$$ on June 22, 2023, 01:30:35 PM

War can never stop existing but it can be reduced to the bare minimum because as civilization continue to grow government has started realizing that there's no benefits from killing ourselves just because of war that dialoguing can easily resolved. War is part of human begin exitance as it has been around for a very long time.

As an advance form of human existence we have to be different. This is the reason I dislike Vladimir Putin for putting Ukraine through the situation they're going through now. He didn't have to go to world with them, he should have been the bigger person and not invaded Ukraine. Ukraine are also at fault but they both should have found a war to resolved their conflict without putting their innocent citizens that consist of young boys and girls at risk of getting hit by missiles and guns. We can reduced the wars by dialoguing and resolved whatever conflict any two or more nations are facing. We have some evil business man that invest heavily in firearms and they're those secretly sponsoring this wars going on in different countries. The government need to find this people and put an end to their betrayal to humanity. We should be able to live in peace and harmony without war.

11 merited post

Quote from: $weetne$$ on February 13, 2024, 08:19:18 PM

For the short term, Bitcoin trading at $50,000 isn't good as many traders will begin to take profits and this will bring selling pressure that'll make Bitcoin to drop in price. A sign to know when to take profit for traders or those that are investing for the short term is when Bitcoin starts getting to many praises and we're not in the bull market season. The hype will make traders and Investors to start taking profits. Another sign is when your exit target has been reached. If you had a target to sell at $50,000, you should sell and not allow other to convince you. Many people will always be saying Bitcoin will continue rising but Bitcoin takes a break after rising for sometime and I think we're around that period that Bitcoin will experience a correction therefore my advice isn't for holders but traders.

6 merited post

Quote from: $weetne$$ on March 25, 2024, 06:30:32 PM

Arsenal has been playing very well this season and I was surprised that they lost against Porto in the first leg of the round of 16 but it was a well deserved victory that arsenal got to move on to the next round. it's unlucky that they will have to play Bayern Munich for the quarter finals. Arsenal is playing very well but Bayern Munich is going to win them. Arsenal has an advantage as they'll playing at home first therefore they should use that and win the game with a high number of goals because Bayern Munich are goal machine and they won't be shy to score you a lot of goals. This match is going to be a good match to watch because Arsenal has alot of things to proven in this game to show everybody's that they have what it takes to becomes the champion of Europe.

Gormicsta beg merit from merit source and distribute it to his farm.

See $weetne$$ sends merit to. Wait for merit source like fillippone, JayJuanGee, The Sceptical Chymist and if merit source merit a post, he will send merit to that post, friends join with more merit.
https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=%24weetne%24%24&to=Su-asa
https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=%24weetne%24%24&to=Obim34
https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=%24weetne%24%24&to=Majestic-milf
https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=%24weetne%24%24&to=Fiatless
https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=%24weetne%24%24&to=Orpichukwu

Is $weetne$$ a very good poster to earn 201 merit in 60 days with 150 post?

Topic: Get 201 merits in 2 months from a farm (Read 1358 times)