Now of course I have not deleted your voice, or cut your vocal chords at that point and you are free to shout out if you like. You say that mugger has not influenced my freedom to scream out. Im going to do it right now to demonstrate this fact. Boom you're now gonna get as much action as the pharmacist.
Now a smart person knows the mugger has effectively crushed their free speech and not scream out. He loses some jewels but not his crown jewels.
this is not a perfect analogy and before fox poop arrives to tell us all that is highly unlikely a mugger would use a gun because that goes bang and is louder than screaming for help. Also he would leave immediately and not fumble around for the wallet covered in blood etc etc.
Please no more groundless accusations. You seem to not grasp the concept at all. I find you funny but still we must be clear that I am not telling lies or creating fake drama. I have offered the challenge to this entire board to bring me the incorrect information that I have presented many many times. I see nothing presented by anyone. Therefore what I am saying is true or at least nobody can provide compelling refutation.
If you believe you can offer a refutation to my central point as to how the systems of control observably operate and their implications for this board with regard free speech. Go to this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-most-important-thread-you-can-contribute-to-this-yearno-kidding-5088852 and pull it apart and prove me wrong. I will see you there. They are quite simple and if you have a nice long read a few times you will understand that trying to deny it in public makes you look quite foolish.
This thread is not specifically aimed just at robo vac AI only that that screen shot demonstrates how many topics he is replying on at one time all about merit. It is just the total obsession with slathering merit on and obsessing about merit related stats and some fantasy about their relevance relating to other totally unrelated matters like trust. When you accept that merit by its very nature is subjective and of very low value with regard anything other than preventing bots and account farmers then perhaps it is time to focus on other areas of interest.
I am simply saying why not have a board called merit board where merit is discussed and others can get a fair chance at a slice of the merit pie served up in that section by providing their merit data pulls.
Does loyceV do a good job at what he does? yes I guess so but he has enough merits now right? so give some other people who can pull merit stats a chance by telling them ...hey here is merit board everything about merit here. You want to pulls stats and talk about merits and how much you love them and their brilliant cure all capabilities and how having more makes you a "better" more "valuable" poster? come here and do it.
Meta can then focus on some other things too and perhaps find better systems to build out to improve things here. Sometimes getting fixated on a singe cure for all issues solution is not wise.
I think drilling down and creating some accepted standards for many behaviours here in terms of what are to receive reward and punishment would be the first thing to establish with the long term goal of creating and optimal environment for crypto to flourish. Most of the friction around seems to be because people have very different ideas on what is "good" and "bad" and "optimal" sub optimal". While we all focus on merits this is not going to happen. Merits are useful to prevent bots and account farmers. Nothing more in their current form.