Topic: Going up! (Read 1637 times)
1. you need at least two points of contact. …
2. sometimes wicks (shadows) contain outliers. try to imagine the distribution of the data and draw lines accordingly …
… and if you know a bit about models and fitting: i see this as an approximation problem. e.g. take all the max-points for a given sliding and overlapping interval (i.e. "top points") and approximate them via a linear function. (it's also linear if you take the logarithm). then, the residual could be calculated using the L-1 or L-2 norm. L-1 referrs to point 1 of arepo, L-2 is his/her second point. 2. sometimes wicks (shadows) contain outliers. try to imagine the distribution of the data and draw lines accordingly …
Advanced data fitters might also consider to assign weights to the points, e.g. the last points have an exponentially higher weight than the first ones. e.g. in python/numpy: np.exp(np.linspace(-1, 0, 10)) if you have 10 points.
in python's "statsmodesl" it's OLS and WLS.
… and if you have more points to fit and want to take outliers into account, look into RLS: http://statsmodels.sourceforge.net/devel/examples/generated/example_rlm.html
to all the newbies drawing trendlines and triangles -- just some tips:
1. you need at least two points of contact. a line is defined by two points so you can draw any line you want about one (this is no rigorous enough, obviously). further, if your line only has two points of contact, it is not as robust of a model that has more.
2. sometimes wicks (shadows) contain outliers. try to imagine the distribution of the data and draw lines accordingly -- it's TA, not connect-the-dots. beware of apophenia. just because you see a pattern doesn't mean it's a proper, predictive, or particularly robust model.
1. you need at least two points of contact. a line is defined by two points so you can draw any line you want about one (this is no rigorous enough, obviously). further, if your line only has two points of contact, it is not as robust of a model that has more.
2. sometimes wicks (shadows) contain outliers. try to imagine the distribution of the data and draw lines accordingly -- it's TA, not connect-the-dots. beware of apophenia. just because you see a pattern doesn't mean it's a proper, predictive, or particularly robust model.
+1 LOL so many noobs here
to all the newbies drawing trendlines and triangles -- just some tips:
1. you need at least two points of contact. a line is defined by two points so you can draw any line you want about one (this is not rigorous enough, obviously). further, if your line only has two points of contact, it is not as robust as a model that has more.
2. sometimes wicks (shadows) contain outliers. try to imagine the distribution of the data and draw lines accordingly -- it's TA, not connect-the-dots. beware of apophenia. just because you see a pattern doesn't mean it's a proper, predictive, or particularly robust model.
1. you need at least two points of contact. a line is defined by two points so you can draw any line you want about one (this is not rigorous enough, obviously). further, if your line only has two points of contact, it is not as robust as a model that has more.
2. sometimes wicks (shadows) contain outliers. try to imagine the distribution of the data and draw lines accordingly -- it's TA, not connect-the-dots. beware of apophenia. just because you see a pattern doesn't mean it's a proper, predictive, or particularly robust model.
The price was being held down under the down channel upper wall very well. In your chart the price isn't actually hitting the upper line at all for most of the last week. I think your upper line needs to be lower, in which case the price just broke through it.
You are correct, but it could reverse anytime now. It's not a mind blowing breakout, it's a little breakout of little significance. IMO.
30-min PVT says something big is brewing...
-===-
-===-
this is the decisive moment... the only question is -- up or down?
-===-
-===-
this is the decisive moment... the only question is -- up or down?
The price was being held down under the down channel upper wall very well. In your chart the price isn't actually hitting the upper line at all for most of the last week. I think your upper line needs to be lower, in which case the price just broke through it.
You are correct, but it could reverse anytime now. It's not a mind blowing breakout, it's a little breakout of little significance. IMO. My idea:
We are not going up. Not yet.
We are not going up. Not yet.
The price was being held down under the down channel upper wall very well. In your chart the price isn't actually hitting the upper line at all for most of the last week. I think your upper line needs to be lower, in which case the price just broke through it.
Crash = bear trap.
My idea:
We are not going up. Not yet.
We are not going up. Not yet.
I've been watching that painful down channel for days, finally broken up! 
i posted this in the new hardcore thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1862366
thank's for drawing the lines! although, the case hasn't been quite resolved yet … we'll see. this could also be the beginning of an upside down cup, like before.
thank's for drawing the lines! although, the case hasn't been quite resolved yet … we'll see. this could also be the beginning of an upside down cup, like before.
This could be a decisive reversal. We'll see...
Jump to: