those are all valid reviews for listed products.
How could you have the audacity to label those reviews as valid while 1/3rd of them have dates, "prior" to the creation date of your website?
@stompix also included one of them ["October 19, 2021"].- Video proof [this time, don't even bother to delete the pages (like what you did with the one stompix linked yesterday)]
Note: I had to record a video since none of those fake reviews appear if you try to archive them!
if those were fake why would we add some bad ones?
To make them appear as genuine reviews, duh!
ArchivedNone of the reviews are deleted. Check here:
https://jeemomart.com/product/portable-charging-powerbank/JeemoMart is a new dropshipping website like many others, so all those reviews are from product suppliers for listed products. We have no intention to rip off anyone here.
Hope this clarifies now.
those are all valid reviews for listed products.
How could you have the audacity to label those reviews as valid while 1/3rd of them have dates, "prior" to the creation date of your website?
@stompix also included one of them ["October 19, 2021"].- Video proof [this time, don't even bother to delete the pages (like what you did with the one stompix linked yesterday)]
Note: I had to record a video since none of those fake reviews appear if you try to archive them!
if those were fake why would we add some bad ones?
To make them appear as genuine reviews, duh!
ArchivedSince the website is new and stompix misunderstood the word "Large" thought it is a very old website, We meant "Large" that we have many trending products and categories. And about "400.000 order shipped" was website theme promotional/Booster text which is fixed now.
Again those reviews are from products suppliers for listed product from their wholesale platform.
Regards
We are very excited to see your reply on this and waiting.....
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
