Author

Topic: .gov seizure... could the community seize it right back? (Read 829 times)

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.
Gabi, please elaborate.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
Quote
Wouldn't this kind of transaction require a software support?
Yup, this is why it would be a hard fork. But it would not need 51% of anything, you would create Bitcoin2.

Quote
No. 51% can only make a Denial of Service attack.
It cannot send bitcoins to another wallet. You still need a private key to do that.
Wrong. You can go back in the blockchain and rewrite the block wich created the coins used in that transactions and have them mined by you. Since you mined them, you can send them to whoever you want. That is a 51% attack.

But the OP was not speaking about a 51% attack but about a hard fork, wich would create Bitcoin2, exactly like we have namecoin, litecoin etcetc.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Possible? Probably yes

Quote
Of course, 51% would have to agree by updating to new clients
That is NOT how a hard fork work  Roll Eyes

Wouldn't this kind of transaction require a software support?


But this sort of thing is very questionable. Where do we start from and where do we end. And what is chosen acceptable and what is not.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
Possible? Probably yes

Quote
Of course, 51% would have to agree by updating to new clients
That is NOT how a hard fork work  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
Just curious here, but it seems to me that the community as a whole has control over what transactions are valid and which are not. Would it be possible to create a fork in the blockchain that contained a transaction from the .gov wallet that houses the seized Silk Road coins that send them to another wallet? Perhaps to bitcoin.org, or a charity, or to somewhere where it will do some good for the community at large.

Of course, 51% would have to agree by updating to new clients. But my question is not so much if we should try to do it, but rather if it is technically possible. Thoughts?
Jump to: