Author

Topic: Governments are Watching (Read 1276 times)

member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
June 09, 2013, 03:41:06 PM
#33
Internet Providers control their customers traffic for copyright infringement
Wrong.
It's the majors that look for "copyright infringement" in the bittorrent protocol (only bittorent. DDL? Streaming? What the hell are those?).
They record the IP addresses of the bad guys who upload copyrighted stuff and they send it to the Hadopi.
Then the Hadopi asks to the ISPs the person corresponding to the IP/time of dl (yes, according to the French, an IP can identify a person) and it sends an email to this person saying 'Hey, we can't prove that you downloaded but you're a bad guy for not making your internet access secure enough, you better change that'.
Yes, the French think that it is possible to make your access completely 100% secure. Not possible? That's not their business. I guess they want people to make their own WPA.


after 3 violations there is a whole bunch of penalties.
After 3 violations, the Hadopi can chose what it wants to do:

The potential sentence in court is a fine + cut of the "criminal" internet access.
Pretty dumb as you can open another access in another ISP the day after.

Anyway, they were in total two trials since 2010. Yeah TWO!! Brrrrrrrr, scary.
Results:

Let's sum up.
3 years, € 30M budget, 2 trials, a €150 fine.

Now it's being stopped as it's not working.


I´m pretty sure the French know what Internet is... Wink
Yeah.
Absolutely.

Thanks a lot for your detailed explanation. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
June 09, 2013, 02:55:48 PM
#32
Internet Providers control their customers traffic for copyright infringement
Wrong.
It's the majors that look for "copyright infringement" in the bittorrent protocol (only bittorent. DDL? Streaming? What the hell are those?).
They record the IP addresses of the bad guys who upload copyrighted stuff and they send it to the Hadopi.
Then the Hadopi asks to the ISPs the person corresponding to the IP/time of dl (yes, according to the French, an IP can identify a person) and it sends an email to this person saying 'Hey, we can't prove that you downloaded but you're a bad guy for not making your internet access secure enough, you better change that'.
Yes, the French think that it is possible to make your access completely 100% secure. Not possible? That's not their business. I guess they want people to make their own WPA.


after 3 violations there is a whole bunch of penalties.
After 3 violations, the Hadopi can chose what it wants to do:

The potential sentence in court is a fine + cut of the "criminal" internet access.
Pretty dumb as you can open another access in another ISP the day after.

Anyway, they were in total two trials since 2010. Yeah TWO!! Brrrrrrrr, scary.
Results:

Let's sum up.
3 years, € 30M budget, 2 trials, a €150 fine.

Now it's being stopped as it's not working.


I´m pretty sure the French know what Internet is... Wink
Yeah.
Absolutely.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
June 09, 2013, 02:51:52 PM
#31
Quote
lol. If you think they're sifting through your stuff manually in any way you are being naive.

I can understand that way of thinking, but if you think about it if they have sense of due process left they're going to be forced to go through it if they want to arrest anyone, you can't just go and make shit up otherwise you'll end up getting arrested or sued no matter who you are and of course if worse comes to worse people are going to be after your head. The only way they could get away with not checking through the stuff their systems look at manually is by being blatantly illegal and then no one would go along with it, they're digging their own graves.
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
June 09, 2013, 02:11:32 PM
#30
So with the announcements of the US secret projects on monitoring internet conversations, phone records and other things with agreement over multiple forms of media. What methods if any do you prefer to use to avoid this form of stalking Smiley

http://www.vice.com/read/privacys-public-death
Can we please get rid of the U.S. government now. Come on.
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
June 09, 2013, 01:46:33 PM
#29
Not all governments. The French still don't know what internet is

In France exists one of the first Internet Surveillance Laws in Europe - since 2010. Internet Providers control their customers traffic for copyright infringement and after 3 violations there is a whole bunch of penalties. I´m pretty sure the French know what Internet is... Wink
global moderator
Activity: 3766
Merit: 2610
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
June 09, 2013, 01:27:29 PM
#28
Not all governments. The French still don't know what internet is
I think they know, they're just to stubborn to accept that the language of it's users is mostly english.
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1722
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
June 09, 2013, 01:19:45 PM
#27
Ronald J Deibert at TEDx Toronto - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAJ6BtZDhUk

Not my department [29c3] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mnuofn_DXw

"So, who is watching the watchers ?"  Cool
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
June 09, 2013, 01:11:44 PM
#26
Not all governments. The French still don't know what internet is
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
June 09, 2013, 09:01:56 AM
#25
The thing is, I just laugh my head off at the thought of the government trying to track people on the internet, if I did ever got labelled a risk, imagine the poor sod who's going to have to go through all the porn I've downloaded Cheesy and it's going to be like that for every internet person they try to track.

lol. If you think they're sifting through your stuff manually in any way you are being naive.

It's not about "tracking people on the internet", it's about identifying the 'dangerous individuals'.

Google "big data". example: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_innovation

Just imagine such technology in the hands of the Nazis. example: cleansing of the "intelligentsia" in Poland by Nazis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_Lviv_professors
global moderator
Activity: 3766
Merit: 2610
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
June 09, 2013, 08:33:12 AM
#24
The thing is, I just laugh my head off at the thought of the government trying to track people on the internet, if I did ever got labelled a risk, imagine the poor sod who's going to have to go through all the porn I've downloaded Cheesy and it's going to be like that for every internet person they try to track.
Maybe they enjoy watching all that stuff. You never know.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
June 09, 2013, 08:20:26 AM
#23
The thing is, I just laugh my head off at the thought of the government trying to track people on the internet, if I did ever got labelled a risk, imagine the poor sod who's going to have to go through all the porn I've downloaded Cheesy and it's going to be like that for every internet person they try to track.
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
June 09, 2013, 08:18:30 AM
#22
I like the stance people take in this video: http://theriseandriseofbitcoin.com/

"you're not going to end the fed, are you?", "no, transcend the fed".

or even better the avalon dude: "we're not going to fight them, we will just ignore them".

Yeah, ignoring doesn't usually solve the problem.

global moderator
Activity: 3766
Merit: 2610
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
June 09, 2013, 07:48:27 AM
#21
I like the stance people take in this video: http://theriseandriseofbitcoin.com/

"you're not going to end the fed, are you?", "no, transcend the fed".

or even better the avalon dude: "we're not going to fight them, we will just ignore them".

Yeah, ignoring doesn't usually solve the problem.
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
June 09, 2013, 07:19:23 AM
#20
I like the stance people take in this video: http://theriseandriseofbitcoin.com/

"you're not going to end the fed, are you?", "no, transcend the fed".

or even better the avalon dude: "we're not going to fight them, we will just ignore them".
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
June 09, 2013, 07:14:28 AM
#19
So you watched the first 30 sec. Bullshit is just the title of the series and it's actually a very government critical show of two libertarians that has won several awards.

The Title doesn't really represent the actual content.

Oh strange. For some reason I thought it had ended at that point. Will watch more...

On your point about incompetent government: you might well be correctly describing the current status quo. However, these people don't usually do any work themselves (it's too dangerous, they might make mistakes and be responsible for them), they just contract it out. Within the scientific community there's a lot of talk about "big data" and such and I think it's only a matter of time until corporations see the huge opportunity and start selling "solutions" to the government.
global moderator
Activity: 3766
Merit: 2610
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
June 09, 2013, 05:08:30 AM
#18
Quote
Governments are watching.

I'm so scared.

It's not the governments that will be your ruin. It's your curious neighbors, people you pissed off, corporations, marketers, social networks, criminals, crooks, malicious types, perverts, gossip spreaders, blackmailers, and identity thieves. Your privacy is gone, and it's not the government that's taking it.

Curious neighbor: I saw you watching Porntube!
The best response to such statement eould be "I saw you jacking off to it"
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 372
June 08, 2013, 10:38:43 PM
#17
Quote
Every bit of wealth held in digital currency or gold or silver is a nail in the coffin of the state.
Why we're here @ this site. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
June 08, 2013, 08:29:17 PM
#16
I wouldn't worry so much about this. Yes, the Government(s) is (are) watching. They probably try to get as much Data on every single person as legally(?) possible.

But, all this Data is collected by government agencies. Do you really think the same guys that mess up every single project they touch are even capable to put all this data to use?

There is not very much to worry about, not because they respect your freedom (which they don't) but because government paid lazy bureaucrats are to incompetent to use this data.

Also every government funded agency always grows and grows, gets more expensive and continuously inefficient. Now they start all this projects and in 10 - 15 years we will see headlines like this in the press:

You've got balls of steel. I wouldn't bet the well-being of the world on a certain large group of people with force on their hands not encompassing enough competence to identify their opponents.

You maybe understood my statement wrong. I find this development as outrageous and worrying as the (I think) majority here.

I just don't think that all the surveillance data of 100th of Millions of people (Internet, Cams, Car traffic, etc.) is evaluable in any economical way.

Also the people that would need to evaluate all this data are just some low paid government employees which are to lazy or uneducated to get a "real" job. I just don't feel threatened by them.

The fact that of course remains is that governments are tiring to get all this data, which is very worring. I just don't see them succeed.

This surveillance efforts will probably be even less successful as the war on drugs and even more costly. Everyone that has something to hide will find ways to hide it, so they will end of will gigantic amounts of useless data.

Quote
Government internet surveillance costs the Taxpayer 30 Billion the year and has not stopped a single terrorist act

Maybe it's not incompetence or failure of method. What if the terrorist acts weren't supposed to be stopped? What if they were even manufactured?

Well, that's a totally different topic and changes nothing at the huge costs of surveillance efforts.


The vast majority of people here can probably agree that "big brother is bullshit".

So you watched the first 30 sec. Bullshit is just the title of the series and it's actually a very government critical show of two libertarians that has won several awards.

The Title doesn't really represent the actual content.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
June 08, 2013, 07:41:44 PM
#15
Quote
Governments are watching.

I'm so scared.

It's not the governments that will be your ruin. It's your curious neighbors, people you pissed off, corporations, marketers, social networks, criminals, crooks, malicious types, perverts, gossip spreaders, blackmailers, and identity thieves. Your privacy is gone, and it's not the government that's taking it.

Curious neighbor: I saw you watching Porntube!
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
June 08, 2013, 07:24:28 PM
#14
Quote
It's not the governments that will be your ruin. It's your curious neighbors, people you pissed off, corporations, marketers, social networks, criminals, crooks, malicious types, perverts, gossip spreaders, blackmailers, and identity thieves. Your privacy is gone, and it's not the government that's taking it.
I did not know that FBI and NSA all are thieves, criminals, crooks, perverts and blacmailers.

The average gangbanger and drug dealer are not trying to pass laws of backdoors and data retention. It is FBI CIA NSA and learned elders of zionism who are behind all this mass surveillance and nanny state.
Quote
If you're a normal person, then nothing you do is interesting. If the algorithms cough up something that it thought was interesting, then the people look at it. Then, again, if you're normal (i.e not some Boston bomber), then the person dismisses it.
Did that prevented Boston bombings? Did that stopped Breivik. No. And realistically it would not. And that is not even the true purpose of such surveillance. Total control and elimination of all dissent is what this surveillance is all about. With such total control no revolution or deviaton from official party ideology will be possible. Every single rebellion could be identified and crushed in early stages. Even before the rebels would start thinking about disobeying their supreme leaders.

Then why are they not crushing us now? Algorithms not evolved enough?

The government largely is a bunch of lazy ass pension seekers. Go to the dmv if you want to see government in action. The governments of the world cant keep people feed.. they screwed up and let the people get the internet uncensored.. there are open drug markets online if they cant stop that how are they going to do shit about anything. It is just a matter of time. Governments of the world are not going to get stronger they are going to shrink to the point that no one cares what they do. Every bit of wealth held in digital currency or gold or silver is a nail in the coffin of the state.

This is a view I like. Mainly because it offers an easy-to-implement principle of action towards governments: ignore them.

I wouldn't worry so much about this. Yes, the Government(s) is (are) watching. They probably try to get as much Data on every single person as legally(?) possible.

But, all this Data is collected by government agencies. Do you really think the same guys that mess up every single project they touch are even capable to put all this data to use?

There is not very much to worry about, not because they respect your freedom (which they don't) but because government paid lazy bureaucrats are to incompetent to use this data.

Also every government funded agency always grows and grows, gets more expensive and continuously inefficient. Now they start all this projects and in 10 - 15 years we will see headlines like this in the press:

You've got balls of steel. I wouldn't bet the well-being of the world on a certain large group of people with force on their hands not encompassing enough competence to identify their opponents.

Quote
Government internet surveillance costs the Taxpayer 30 Billion the year and has not stopped a single terrorist act

Maybe it's not incompetence or failure of method. What if the terrorist acts weren't supposed to be stopped? What if they were even manufactured?


The vast majority of people here can probably agree that "big brother is bullshit".
2D
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
June 08, 2013, 06:46:23 PM
#13
But, all this Data is collected by government agencies. Do you really think the same guys that mess up every single project they touch are even capable to put all this data to use?

I know for a fact that this data is being used by people who shouldn't have access to it (ie. buddies of guys who are authorized to access it). One sociopath even uses it to stalk porn stars.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
June 08, 2013, 06:39:16 PM
#12
I wouldn't worry so much about this. Yes, the Government(s) is (are) watching. They probably try to get as much Data on every single person as legally(?) possible.

But, all this Data is collected by government agencies. Do you really think the same guys that mess up every single project they touch are even capable to put all this data to use?

There is not very much to worry about, not because they respect your freedom (which they don't) but because government paid lazy bureaucrats are to incompetent to use this data.

Also every government funded agency always grows and grows, gets more expensive and continuously inefficient. Now they start all this projects and in 10 - 15 years we will see headlines like this in the press:

Quote
Government internet surveillance costs the Taxpayer 30 Billion the year and has not stopped a single terrorist act


Also watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVaodJQmnRc
2D
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
June 08, 2013, 06:22:57 PM
#11
PGP. OTR. Bitcoin.

Everything (not just meta data) is archived, so they can just go back and crack PGP at their leisure.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
June 08, 2013, 05:45:38 PM
#10
The government largely is a bunch of lazy ass pension seekers. Go to the dmv if you want to see government in action. The governments of the world cant keep people feed.. they screwed up and let the people get the internet uncensored.. there are open drug markets online if they cant stop that how are they going to do shit about anything. It is just a matter of time. Governments of the world are not going to get stronger they are going to shrink to the point that no one cares what they do. Every bit of wealth held in digital currency or gold or silver is a nail in the coffin of the state.
global moderator
Activity: 3766
Merit: 2610
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
June 08, 2013, 05:34:27 PM
#9
Quote
It's not the governments that will be your ruin. It's your curious neighbors, people you pissed off, corporations, marketers, social networks, criminals, crooks, malicious types, perverts, gossip spreaders, blackmailers, and identity thieves. Your privacy is gone, and it's not the government that's taking it.
I did not know that FBI and NSA all are thieves, criminals, crooks, perverts and blacmailers.

The average gangbanger and drug dealer are not trying to pass laws of backdoors and data retention. It is FBI CIA NSA and learned elders of zionism who are behind all this mass surveillance and nanny state.
Quote
If you're a normal person, then nothing you do is interesting. If the algorithms cough up something that it thought was interesting, then the people look at it. Then, again, if you're normal (i.e not some Boston bomber), then the person dismisses it.
Did that prevented Boston bombings? Did that stopped Breivik. No. And realistically it would not. And that is not even the true purpose of such surveillance. Total control and elimination of all dissent is what this surveillance is all about. With such total control no revolution or deviaton from official party ideology will be possible. Every single rebellion could be identified and crushed in early stages. Even before the rebels would start thinking about disobeying their supreme leaders.
Even though such control gives security, it still seems kind of frightening to me.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1049
Death to enemies!
June 08, 2013, 02:29:23 PM
#8
Quote
It's not the governments that will be your ruin. It's your curious neighbors, people you pissed off, corporations, marketers, social networks, criminals, crooks, malicious types, perverts, gossip spreaders, blackmailers, and identity thieves. Your privacy is gone, and it's not the government that's taking it.
I did not know that FBI and NSA all are thieves, criminals, crooks, perverts and blacmailers.

The average gangbanger and drug dealer are not trying to pass laws of backdoors and data retention. It is FBI CIA NSA and learned elders of zionism who are behind all this mass surveillance and nanny state.
Quote
If you're a normal person, then nothing you do is interesting. If the algorithms cough up something that it thought was interesting, then the people look at it. Then, again, if you're normal (i.e not some Boston bomber), then the person dismisses it.
Did that prevented Boston bombings? Did that stopped Breivik. No. And realistically it would not. And that is not even the true purpose of such surveillance. Total control and elimination of all dissent is what this surveillance is all about. With such total control no revolution or deviaton from official party ideology will be possible. Every single rebellion could be identified and crushed in early stages. Even before the rebels would start thinking about disobeying their supreme leaders.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
June 08, 2013, 12:33:10 PM
#7
I'm so scared.

It's not the governments that will be your ruin. It's your curious neighbors, people you pissed off, corporations, marketers, social networks, criminals, crooks, malicious types, perverts, gossip spreaders, blackmailers, and identity thieves. Your privacy is gone, and it's not the government that's taking it.

What about when governments install CCTV cameras outside your house? I don't want them to know exactly when I arrive/leave my house, so they're invading my privacy. I'm not saying they're the worst, but they still belong on the list.

The NSA, and other organizations, are composed of two things: databases and people. The people don't know you, nor do they care about you. The databases are harddrives. The people don't actually look at the harddrives until something happens, or the harddrive coughs up something interesting.

If you're a normal person, then nothing you do is interesting. If the algorithms cough up something that it thought was interesting, then the people look at it. Then, again, if you're normal (i.e not some Boston bomber), then the person dismisses it.

In the end, what the NSA, or other organizations collect are bits which do nothing.

Furthermore, and this is very important, if they're collecting massive amounts of data on everyone, then it stands to reason that you're not special. Just go on about your life.

However, perverts, blackmailers, people you've wronged, tweeters, identity thieves, and neighbors have a different modus operandi. They have you in their sights, and then take action to collect data on you. Those are the ones you should be worried about.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
June 08, 2013, 04:11:01 AM
#6
I'm so scared.

It's not the governments that will be your ruin. It's your curious neighbors, people you pissed off, corporations, marketers, social networks, criminals, crooks, malicious types, perverts, gossip spreaders, blackmailers, and identity thieves. Your privacy is gone, and it's not the government that's taking it.

What about when governments install CCTV cameras outside your house? I don't want them to know exactly when I arrive/leave my house, so they're invading my privacy. I'm not saying they're the worst, but they still belong on the list.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
June 08, 2013, 02:38:10 AM
#5
Quote
Governments are watching.

I'm so scared.

It's not the governments that will be your ruin. It's your curious neighbors, people you pissed off, corporations, marketers, social networks, criminals, crooks, malicious types, perverts, gossip spreaders, blackmailers, and identity thieves. Your privacy is gone, and it's not the government that's taking it.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
June 08, 2013, 02:06:59 AM
#4
A major is people's browsing habits. They don't care if someone sees what they put online because they think "why would they care about me?". People care more about efficiency and ease of use than their privacy/security. It's only going to get worse as the younger generations get older, we're having this notion of sharing forced upon us wherever we go. The governments are only going to have to do a quick search when they want to know everything about someone because all this information is in the public domain.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1049
Death to enemies!
June 08, 2013, 01:26:43 AM
#3
Quote
Governments are Watching
I see dead people! And black helicopters!
Quote
What methods if any do you prefer to use to avoid this form of stalking
Freenet for file sharing and uncensored discussion.
TorChat for encrypted IM - the best available in terms of privacy and secrecy.
Tor for browsing sensitive information and using it's Socks5 proxy and .onion land.
Good old SSL/TLS for secrecy of transmitted data contents.

Many other possibilities.

The problem is not new ways of spying. Most of that already was possible with court warrant and current technology. The problem is that now even more and more people are spied upon without them committing any crimes and without any warrant or other justification. The western world government are fucked up and beyond and must be discarded and replaced like used diaper.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
June 08, 2013, 01:20:52 AM
#2
PGP. OTR. Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
June 08, 2013, 01:11:09 AM
#1
So with the announcements of the US secret projects on monitoring internet conversations, phone records and other things with agreement over multiple forms of media. What methods if any do you prefer to use to avoid this form of stalking Smiley

http://www.vice.com/read/privacys-public-death
Jump to: