Topic: Green European funds may deal a blow to Tesla (Read 356 times)
The Green European funds on electric cars and solar electricity will still take time for these projects to be achieved and be ready for the consumers consumption or uses. Tesla still have an upper hand with it comes to electric cars with it vast community that are support his product. Although competition will be sure but his product is still of a valuable market to people that loves his product.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Subsidies always create distortions in the economy.
How come it is better to give subsidies to a company which is transitioning to electric, but does not give to a company that was born electric? How can this be more efficient in the goal to reduce carbon emissions than to give the same subsidy to both?
So if I am going to create a new car company in Europe, I have an economic incentive to make a company which will transition to electric rather than create an electric company straight away.
Tesla relies heavily on government subsidies, so there's no functional difference between a company that is born electric and one transitioning to electric. They'll both get the subsidies since the point is to incentivize the production of electric cars, not how the company started.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
I do not believe that Tesla made all this money because they were "only" electric car company out there, there are now other car companies that create their electric lines as well, however Tesla is doing a lot better because they are both optimized a lot better, they are faster, they can go longer, they have auto pilot which is still hands on if you do not want to crash but still improvement and they have so many great things basically.So long story short we are talking about something that is doing quite better than any other electric car, and even if all the other car manufacturers stop making any other car and focus on electric, they are not going to reach tesla level that easily, tesla is already one of the biggest out there and the more others level up, the more tesla levels up as well, not like tesla is standing down and waiting others.
First off, it's a good thing that EU recovery and resilience funds is to boost the economies of nations in the continent to enable them recover from the COVID-19 fallout. I wish other continents would follow suit.
It worthy to note that Tesla already started to lose it's competitive advantage in electric vehicles way before the coronavirus or the recovery fund according to data from this article published in April 2020
(https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/7457a168-b595-4c60-8114-abaaf3f6a2b4).
The funds which has boosted the number of competitors entering into the market is a call to action for Tesla or it's not. Consumers would now have a wide range of options.
It worthy to note that Tesla already started to lose it's competitive advantage in electric vehicles way before the coronavirus or the recovery fund according to data from this article published in April 2020
(https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/7457a168-b595-4c60-8114-abaaf3f6a2b4).
The funds which has boosted the number of competitors entering into the market is a call to action for Tesla or it's not. Consumers would now have a wide range of options.
if so, it seems we all see that Tesla is far behind, where electricity that continues to create excess power is one factor that is not friendly to the surrounding environment (for Tesla). The more we don't have to continue to emit excessive carbon, we have to use resources that are much more environmentally friendly. As a community, we certainly don't want to feel disturbed by the smoke factory that has shifted the land in green open spaces.
I've read a news report from the study institute Ember and Agora Energiewende if I'm not mistaken they say that renewable energy such as wind and solar generates 38% percent of electricity sources from the 27 block member countries in 2020, with fossil fuels such as coal and gas contributing 37% . And if this news is true, the thread you say about investing in auto manufacturers to prepare for the introduction of a large-scale electric car is imminent and Tesla will be on equal footing there will be nothing to distinguish Tesla from any other electric car manufacturer.
But with this happening now do you think that the thinking power of Elon and Tesla is one step ahead of the others or just that they are left behind due to lack of finance so they are waiting for investors to invest there so that they can make electric cars now and not before Elon and Tesla made it?
and the options will increase if for example Elon and Tesla's thinking is one step ahead of the others, are they able to anticipate this with something new? because I'm sure they will not stand by if this is true.
But with this happening now do you think that the thinking power of Elon and Tesla is one step ahead of the others or just that they are left behind due to lack of finance so they are waiting for investors to invest there so that they can make electric cars now and not before Elon and Tesla made it?
and the options will increase if for example Elon and Tesla's thinking is one step ahead of the others, are they able to anticipate this with something new? because I'm sure they will not stand by if this is true.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Perhaps you are right, and Tesla may suffer some damage from the release of new cheaper electric cars and Europe, but you must understand that in order to compete, produce quality goods, but at a lower price, but the appearance of a low price can only be from the appearance cheap fuel to produce cheap energy. Unfortunately, alternative sources of energy, they are also called green, and this is solar energy, wind energy, at the moment they are expensive and it is unlikely that they can make the goods of Europe more competitive. As far as I know, Europe is betting on the use of hydrogen, but this can provide the opportunity to obtain cheaper energy, and therefore produce, for example, cheaper electric cars and be a serious competitor for Tesla.
If anyone here ever fears that we as normal humans have any problems at all regarding this environment crisis, you can be rest assured that you have nothing to do with it. All of the horrible things that is going on in the world, 70% of the world climate problems is attributed to a total of 100 companies, yes you heard it right just 100 companies.
We can simply move to electric vehicles, and we can change anything we want but in the end those companies will keep destroying the world. We need A LOT MORE trees and we need a lot less oil, we need a lot less pollution, hell China all by itself contributes so much to this problem is that if world governments all get together and say "nobody will be trading with china from now on until they fix pollution, and anyone who keeps trading with china will be banned as well", you can call it a fascist move (which it really is) but it is just to save the world, I believe that is justified over money.
We can simply move to electric vehicles, and we can change anything we want but in the end those companies will keep destroying the world. We need A LOT MORE trees and we need a lot less oil, we need a lot less pollution, hell China all by itself contributes so much to this problem is that if world governments all get together and say "nobody will be trading with china from now on until they fix pollution, and anyone who keeps trading with china will be banned as well", you can call it a fascist move (which it really is) but it is just to save the world, I believe that is justified over money.
To be fair, it's not only China who benefits from that activity. Almost 30% of global manufacturing of goods is going on in China. All of us, in all other countries, are using those products. Greenhouse gas emissions is our shared problem. We shouldn't blame China alone.
If anyone here ever fears that we as normal humans have any problems at all regarding this environment crisis, you can be rest assured that you have nothing to do with it. All of the horrible things that is going on in the world, 70% of the world climate problems is attributed to a total of 100 companies, yes you heard it right just 100 companies.
We can simply move to electric vehicles, and we can change anything we want but in the end those companies will keep destroying the world. We need A LOT MORE trees and we need a lot less oil, we need a lot less pollution, hell China all by itself contributes so much to this problem is that if world governments all get together and say "nobody will be trading with china from now on until they fix pollution, and anyone who keeps trading with china will be banned as well", you can call it a fascist move (which it really is) but it is just to save the world, I believe that is justified over money.
We can simply move to electric vehicles, and we can change anything we want but in the end those companies will keep destroying the world. We need A LOT MORE trees and we need a lot less oil, we need a lot less pollution, hell China all by itself contributes so much to this problem is that if world governments all get together and say "nobody will be trading with china from now on until they fix pollution, and anyone who keeps trading with china will be banned as well", you can call it a fascist move (which it really is) but it is just to save the world, I believe that is justified over money.
How is this connected to Doge or cryptocurrency though? ~
Long story short, Elon was saying on multiple occasions that DOGE is more environmentally friendly than Bitcoin. He always misses one important thing, imo: there is more food in places where people produce more, not where they eat less. Same rule can be applied to creating cleaner environment: we can be reducing the carbon emissions not by the means of consuming less energy, but by sponsoring renewable energy sources.At least that's how I see it.
However dropping the energy levels is not a bad idea neither, not you and me, we are just regular humans, but there are factories that kill the world a ton, even just the highest grossing 70 companies end up spending 10% less energy it would solve half of the whole problem, yes that is right 70 companies spending 10% less would solve half of worlds energy problem, that's it, that is all we need, nothing else needs to change. Which is why there is a "drop the energy consumption" method too.
I'm not going to defend those greedy corporations. Of course they should drop the energy consumption. They owe it to the humanity, especially to the future generations. But we, regular folks, can contribute in this good cause too. We can use EV, as @arallmuus suggested above, after all we can "bike more and drive less", we can also use air-conditioning only when it's absolutely necessary etc.
Also don't forget that a part of those European Recovery Funds mentioned in the OP, came from some of us on this forum, from people living in the EU.
We will see now whether Elon Musk will welcome this important European step towards clean energy!! He sure won't be happy with this news!!! This is proof that the liar’s statement against Bitcoin coloring the environment is just advertising nonsense, now his true stance on clean energy will be revealed if he welcomes this European move, but I am sure he will not.
Big businessmen like Elon Musk never care about the cleanliness of the environment. All they care about is filling their pockets with money. I would never be surprised if Elon Musk secretly fought this project or launched a media campaign to thwart the project (despite his false claim of his love for clean energy) because the project will be a strong competitor to Tesla And Elon Musk may start losing profits because he lost his most important advantage.
Big businessmen like Elon Musk never care about the cleanliness of the environment. All they care about is filling their pockets with money. I would never be surprised if Elon Musk secretly fought this project or launched a media campaign to thwart the project (despite his false claim of his love for clean energy) because the project will be a strong competitor to Tesla And Elon Musk may start losing profits because he lost his most important advantage.
I think some people think Elon Musk became a Billionaire because he is stupid... 
The guy obviously planned for other countries to go full electrical in the future and he diversified his companies to absorb knocks like that. He is into space exploration (SpaceX) and infrastructure and tunnel construction services (The Boring Company) - (Underground public transportation systems for Vehicles / Utilities / Freight and Pedestrians)
He also developed the "Powerwall" storage battery that runs with his Solar solutions and he is also into low latency, broadband internet systems (Starlink) ....so this is not going to disrupt his empire!
The guy obviously planned for other countries to go full electrical in the future and he diversified his companies to absorb knocks like that. He is into space exploration (SpaceX) and infrastructure and tunnel construction services (The Boring Company) - (Underground public transportation systems for Vehicles / Utilities / Freight and Pedestrians) He also developed the "Powerwall" storage battery that runs with his Solar solutions and he is also into low latency, broadband internet systems (Starlink) ....so this is not going to disrupt his empire!
I mean ever since tesla got a bit of acknowledgment and popularity due to the fact they are producing high efficient electric cars and made some massive profits in the process, other motor companies have started moving towards electric, and in the past two years i don't think i have ever seen so many electric cars being produced and promoted, and i am sure with this new deal we will be seeing even more transitioning towards electric from big car companies, so if tesla wants to survive they need to come up with something new.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
It’s never a surprise, it’s a normal thing that a business would usually get replaced at times. It happens, and we have seen a lot of businesses that were once at the top, and all of a sudden you see one thing or the other take place and then they get pulled back from the top due to a high competition. But there are still businesses that are able to maintain their position at the top by making good plans and taking the right actions by adapting to changes and what’s trending. So, I think Tesla can still stay ahead of game with proper planning and making sure that they keep coming up with new and better ideas all the times. 
How is this connected to Doge or cryptocurrency though? Just because it's Tesla that's getting the greens means that it will have an effect to the cryptocurrency market? I think that it will somewhat affect but I don't think that it's going to be a big time effect. I am happy that they are subsidizing green energy in the continent because we need this right now or it will be too late.
I am not happy at how Elon used his twitter account to manipulate crypto. Perhaps he should dedicate more time to his own business now. I am just making him realise that... I mean, in the unlikely case he reads this post. I am also aware that some people do not follow that kind of stuff, for which I can only honestly congratulate them, as it is mostly useless manipulation and very close to a punishable action - that is, if the SEC ever cares about what Elon does under the argument of being DUI himself.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Ha! Serves him right! lol. Tesla finally found its match. With this going live, Tesla will be left very far behind and I can only imagine lots of people with personal grudges against Elon Musk and Tesla to support his competition instead. On a side note though, although I kind of frown at the ways Elon manipulates the market, I really think it was a brilliant idea, it's just that the idea alone feeds off of the people that get rekt because of his actions which is morally wrong. But other than that, I think Elon is not dumb or autistic as what most of the people who hate him says because if he were, he never would've reached where he is right now nor will he have such an idea as manipulating the market to his favor.
Anyway, karma has its ways in sticking itself up in the buts of people who deserve it.
I am sorry if you don't know but this is what inventing means in the 20th century. You can Invent anything but the one who makes it worthy for selling is the one who gets the credit. No one needs Inventions, people need products.
You said inventing, so what has Tesla or Apple invented?
Not the touchscreen and not the wheel, and don't go about the batteries as those are made by Panasonic.
So, I'm asking you what technology has Tesla developed that is no match for others that have done in the past.
I think anyone can understand this basic concept of Business, it was obvious that other companies would sooner or later enter into the market, Tesla has its own USP and therefore also has its own customer as well as a fan base who likes the futuristic design, for you, it might be idiotic, for someone your design might be idiotic.
Next time please read twice what I wrote, it's really annoying when somebody quotes you without reading what you wrote.
Bottom line is that they have been able to sell cars at a constant CAGR: https://www.statista.com/statistics/502208/tesla-quarterly-vehicle-deliveries/ despite being a very new company when compared to others some of whom even have experience of 100+ years.
And? Compare that to the jump in sales other brands had, look at the current number of deliveries and think Tesla had 7 years advantage over some brands in the EV department, all that advantage has crumbled in just two years, and it's not like the others are going full power, wait till Renault and VW go on all models full electric. The low-cost sector is nothing Tesla can compete in, in the luxury one it will be game over once the end models from Audi/BMW and Mercedes go full electric, Tesla has no answer the limousines and SUV sector either.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Tesla stocks seems to be overpriced to be honest because the company isn't actually doing anything, the Elon Musk is just selling his fame and words for money in the name of green, global warming,etc...Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
But all other companies also started their plants to manufacture them and I hope atleast in the next 5 years we can see full fledged and affordable electric cars all over the world.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Tesla has made many innovations, but at the end of the day the car manufacturing business is one of the most highly competitive and cutthroat industries in existence. It was inevitable that the other major players, upon seeing Tesla's success and the way many governments were leaning towards a greener future, that they would eventually all go for the electric vehicle market. It seems like every other week a new car manufacturer is claiming that their latest vehicle is the last combustion engine they will be producing - even more so since many countries are pledging to ban new models completely by 2030/2050. Tesla got away with selling "carbon credits" to other manufacturers so they could offset their emissions and this was their most profitable part for a long time, but many big players will stop buying those credits in future so Tesla cars better get profitable real quick.
You see TESLA has now more or less become the Apple of the Vehicles Segment. They are bringing in the technology which was never in the thought of by any other automobile company. They have the edge of technology and an existing loyal customer segment by their side.
Just like Apple?
Yup, they have actually not invented anything and they have just taken existing designs and made them cool.
Also, They obviously would have known from a lot of years, that competition into their space would eventually come today or tomorrow. So I don't think this is going to be a big blow to them.
Times are changing
Tesla's market share of the global electric-car market fell to 11% in April.
The other car manufactures have learned that you simply need to make electric cars look like normal gas cars, not some idiotic futuristic design, and now VW is simply trashing Tesla in Europe and wat till the Audi starts delivering all their models.
The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Tesla has benefited from them too both in the US and EU with all the discounts they've got, just their factory in Germany got 1.2 billion. All those cars sales to date have benefited from "credits" to consumers which were just government subsidies but spent indirectly, so it's not like the others are gaining an advantage but more like that match is equal now, traditional carmakers and their buyers were taxed before while Tesla was subsidized, now it's a more equal game
Bottom line is that they have been able to sell cars at a constant CAGR: https://www.statista.com/statistics/502208/tesla-quarterly-vehicle-deliveries/ despite being a very new company when compared to others some of whom even have experience of 100+ years.
Talking about subsidies, which company leaves the chance of getting subsidies while opening a new Manufacturing Facility Abroad? Lobbying and Diplomacy have always been part of every business around the globe. These traditional car makers too would have taken a hell of lot of assistance at the time of their openings in almost every country.
-snip
This is not just a redesign or swapping and engine for another. All those companies have gigantic factories, supply chains and IP that are specific to combustion engines which are going to be maid obsolete by the electric car. Be certain that not all will survive that or will be re-shaped into something completely different. Design is not a "wide moat", that is, is not a strong competitive advantage. Reputation and loyalty are also narrow moats for most companies.
Even without subsidies, those top automakers will start to produce EV if there is a large market share for it. As we currently know the market share for EV is quite small worldwide which is why those companies doesnt bother about it. IMO, its more like an 'incentives' rather than 'subsidies' for them because once few top automakers started to produce EV when the market share increase, the rest will be forced to follow those steps as well or else they will be left in
However dropping the energy levels is not a bad idea neither, not you and me, we are just regular humans, but there are factories that kill the world a ton, even just the highest grossing 70 companies end up spending 10% less energy it would solve half of the whole problem
Its always start with a small steps to reduce those carbon emissions and one of those small steps would be to start using EV
How is this connected to Doge or cryptocurrency though? ~
Long story short, Elon was saying on multiple occasions that DOGE is more environmentally friendly than Bitcoin. He always misses one important thing, imo: there is more food in places where people produce more, not where they eat less. Same rule can be applied to creating cleaner environment: we can be reducing the carbon emissions not by the means of consuming less energy, but by sponsoring renewable energy sources.At least that's how I see it.
However dropping the energy levels is not a bad idea neither, not you and me, we are just regular humans, but there are factories that kill the world a ton, even just the highest grossing 70 companies end up spending 10% less energy it would solve half of the whole problem, yes that is right 70 companies spending 10% less would solve half of worlds energy problem, that's it, that is all we need, nothing else needs to change. Which is why there is a "drop the energy consumption" method too.
When renewables energy is used globally, the transformation from the current energy will follow to use renewable energy. That means the competition will become tough, and if Tesla is not modified or created new things than the other company, it will not have a chance to compete with them. Maybe Tesla can offer a relationship with all car companies and make a new company that will supply the market. But if all companies join together to blow Tesla, it will not be easy to compete with them since they will have big funds to beat Tesla. But that still more than a year and I think Tesla will figure out how to have a solution.
~
I'm not getting how it's related to Doooge as well. But this is really not going to be massive in the end. The fact that people today are not making enough money to buy EV. Unless they make it like the cars are less than $2,000. They'd have to put charging stations everywhere or else they will have to buy Honda Tesla Charger which still needs gasoline.
I really doubt Tesla cars can climb steep roads. The countries today will still be dependent on the middle eastern countries to import oil. Sadly those countries are not getting richer and they may not be able to invade this time.
How is this connected to Doge or cryptocurrency though? ~
Long story short, Elon was saying on multiple occasions that DOGE is more environmentally friendly than Bitcoin. He always misses one important thing, imo: there is more food in places where people produce more, not where they eat less. Same rule can be applied to creating cleaner environment: we can be reducing the carbon emissions not by the means of consuming less energy, but by sponsoring renewable energy sources.
At least that's how I see it.
How is this connected to Doge or cryptocurrency though? Just because it's Tesla that's getting the greens means that it will have an effect to the cryptocurrency market? I think that it will somewhat affect but I don't think that it's going to be a big time effect. I am happy that they are subsidizing green energy in the continent because we need this right now or it will be too late.
I'm not getting how it's related to Doooge as well. But this is really not going to be massive in the end. The fact that people today are not making enough money to buy EV. Unless they make it like the cars are less than $2,000. They'd have to put charging stations everywhere or else they will have to buy Honda Tesla Charger which still needs gasoline.
I really doubt Tesla cars can climb steep roads. The countries today will still be dependent on the middle eastern countries to import oil. Sadly those countries are not getting richer and they may not be able to invade this time.
How is this connected to Doge or cryptocurrency though? Just because it's Tesla that's getting the greens means that it will have an effect to the cryptocurrency market? I think that it will somewhat affect but I don't think that it's going to be a big time effect. I am happy that they are subsidizing green energy in the continent because we need this right now or it will be too late.
This was far from unexpected. It was always something like "when", not "if".
Tesla is losing by increasing too slow the production. And if they continue like this, at some point their production will become too big and no longer much demand.
I don't fully understand the implications of this thing, but nevertheless even if Tesla loses its "moat" (or one of them), I'm expecting that in the not-so-distant future they won't be the only car manufacturer cranking out electric vehicles--but that's assuming the world is moving toward that, which I think it is.Tesla is losing by increasing too slow the production. And if they continue like this, at some point their production will become too big and no longer much demand.
Once Honda, Ford, Toyota, Volkswagen, and the other car makers and their subsidiaries start producing e-vehicles, Tesla will have lost any edge it had, and it'll be just one car maker among many, making variations on a theme. They were one of the most innovative companies for quite a while, but that doesn't mean they're going to remain on top forever. They're not going to, IMO.
I think there is a chance Elon Musk could step down as tesla CEO. The way that Jeff Bezos recently stepped down as amazon CEO. Elon Musk recently stated on twitter he hates being the CEO boss.
That could very well be the case, especially if Musk keeps pursuing things other than the success of Tesla. Stockholders and the company's board of directors might not appreciate a CEO that doesn't have his eye on the ball.A "moat" is the slang for an unique competitive advantage (perhaps I should have just said so). Tesla has some "moats" such as the driverless technology, the technical advantage in batteries and performance and, on the financial side, they do not have to pay for pre-existing factories designed for combustion engines nor have to loose any patents or IP on these, thus it is "born electric".
If other car markers have what is basically a subsidy to refurb, then the later one is lost. In terms of IP, car makers are quite good at research. They will have to change the direction of such research which is also significantly difficult. Lastly, the driverless technology confers a limited advantage - just until waymo, uber or others get enough "miles".
The full analysis of the competitive landscape for the vehicles in the future would require at least a few hours and good knowledge, so all I am saying is that Tesla is not worth its current marketcap, IMO, and I may lack some technical expertise required, but the assets burden moat will be weakened strongly in the next years.
Subsidies always create distortions in the economy.
How come it is better to give subsidies to a company which is transitioning to electric, but does not give to a company that was born electric? How can this be more efficient in the goal to reduce carbon emissions than to give the same subsidy to both?
So if I am going to create a new car company in Europe, I have an economic incentive to make a company which will transition to electric rather than create an electric company straight away.
How come it is better to give subsidies to a company which is transitioning to electric, but does not give to a company that was born electric? How can this be more efficient in the goal to reduce carbon emissions than to give the same subsidy to both?
So if I am going to create a new car company in Europe, I have an economic incentive to make a company which will transition to electric rather than create an electric company straight away.
We are talking about top automakers companies such as Honda, Toyota, Ford and some other companies which has been established for years. These companies have customers that will always go for their brands so instead of choosing EV from some newly founded automakers companies, people will most likely choose to go for these top companies
The long term goal is probably to convert all the current vehicle into EV so giving subsidies to all these top companies is fair enough to reduce carbon emissions
This is not just a redesign or swapping and engine for another. All those companies have gigantic factories, supply chains and IP that are specific to combustion engines which are going to be maid obsolete by the electric car. Be certain that not all will survive that or will be re-shaped into something completely different. Design is not a "wide moat", that is, is not a strong competitive advantage. Reputation and loyalty are also narrow moats for most companies.
The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
...
But the competition is getting near.
...
That is the point yes, competition is near and that erodes Tesla´s advantage.
...
Possibly these other car markers will prefer to license technologies from Tesla instead of reinventing the wheel.
...
Possibly these other car markers will prefer to license technologies from Tesla instead of reinventing the wheel.
...
Then Tesla changes from a car maket to an Research and Development company, which would not require building all those factories. Seems that the strategy is not licencing.
...
Subsidies always create distortions in the economy.
How come it is better to give subsidies to a company which is transitioning to electric, but does not give to a company that was born electric? How can this be more efficient in the goal to reduce carbon emissions than to give the same subsidy to both?
..
Subsidies always create distortions in the economy.
How come it is better to give subsidies to a company which is transitioning to electric, but does not give to a company that was born electric? How can this be more efficient in the goal to reduce carbon emissions than to give the same subsidy to both?
..
Tesla has received huge subsidies for being "green".
You see TESLA has now more or less become the Apple of the Vehicles Segment. They are bringing in the technology which was never in the thought of by any other automobile company. They have the edge of technology and an existing loyal customer segment by their side.
Just like Apple?
Yup, they have actually not invented anything and they have just taken existing designs and made them cool.
Also, They obviously would have known from a lot of years, that competition into their space would eventually come today or tomorrow. So I don't think this is going to be a big blow to them.
Times are changing
Tesla's market share of the global electric-car market fell to 11% in April.
The other car manufactures have learned that you simply need to make electric cars look like normal gas cars, not some idiotic futuristic design, and now VW is simply trashing Tesla in Europe and wat till the Audi starts delivering all their models.
The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Tesla has benefited from them too both in the US and EU with all the discounts they've got, just their factory in Germany got 1.2 billion. All those cars sales to date have benefited from "credits" to consumers which were just government subsidies but spent indirectly, so it's not like the others are gaining an advantage but more like that match is equal now, traditional carmakers and their buyers were taxed before while Tesla was subsidized, now it's a more equal game
Subsidies always create distortions in the economy.
How come it is better to give subsidies to a company which is transitioning to electric, but does not give to a company that was born electric? How can this be more efficient in the goal to reduce carbon emissions than to give the same subsidy to both?
So if I am going to create a new car company in Europe, I have an economic incentive to make a company which will transition to electric rather than create an electric company straight away.
How come it is better to give subsidies to a company which is transitioning to electric, but does not give to a company that was born electric? How can this be more efficient in the goal to reduce carbon emissions than to give the same subsidy to both?
So if I am going to create a new car company in Europe, I have an economic incentive to make a company which will transition to electric rather than create an electric company straight away.
We are talking about top automakers companies such as Honda, Toyota, Ford and some other companies which has been established for years. These companies have customers that will always go for their brands so instead of choosing EV from some newly founded automakers companies, people will most likely choose to go for these top companies
The long term goal is probably to convert all the current vehicle into EV so giving subsidies to all these top companies is fair enough to reduce carbon emissions
IMO it has already been pretty long since EV was no longer a moat, and things are getting worse for Tesla each year, as the competition grows. GM is already making more profit, and considering that prices for Tesla are skyrocketing, people will likely (if not already) consider switching.
The EV market also expands quickly with such companies as Ford, Renault, Volkswagen offering EVs. But the decision by the EU will most likely make things even worse for Tesla.
I don't know what should we expect from Musk, but leaving the company at difficult times like this would literally be the worst and cowardly move from the CEO, I rather hope he'll work on some new implementations that would give his company an advantage against the competing companies.
Also, let's not forget that Musk owns a large chunk of Tesla's shares, so, at least, it is in his pragmatic interest to keep the company alive.
The EV market also expands quickly with such companies as Ford, Renault, Volkswagen offering EVs. But the decision by the EU will most likely make things even worse for Tesla.
I don't know what should we expect from Musk, but leaving the company at difficult times like this would literally be the worst and cowardly move from the CEO, I rather hope he'll work on some new implementations that would give his company an advantage against the competing companies.
Also, let's not forget that Musk owns a large chunk of Tesla's shares, so, at least, it is in his pragmatic interest to keep the company alive.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
You see TESLA has now more or less become the Apple of the Vehicles Segment. They are bringing in the technology which was never in the thought of by any other automobile company. They have the edge of technology and an existing loyal customer segment by their side. Also, They obviously would have known from a lot of years, that competition into their space would eventually come today or tomorrow. So I don't think this is going to be a big blow to them. It's just a usual free-market phenomenon, whenever there is a supernormal profit scenario in a business, new businesses kick in to bring down the prices to the equilibrium. Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Subsidies always create distortions in the economy.
How come it is better to give subsidies to a company which is transitioning to electric, but does not give to a company that was born electric? How can this be more efficient in the goal to reduce carbon emissions than to give the same subsidy to both?
So if I am going to create a new car company in Europe, I have an economic incentive to make a company which will transition to electric rather than create an electric company straight away.
This was far from unexpected. It was always something like "when", not "if".
Tesla is losing by increasing too slow the production. And if they continue like this, at some point their production will become too big and no longer much demand.
I don't fully understand the implications of this thing, but nevertheless even if Tesla loses its "moat" (or one of them), I'm expecting that in the not-so-distant future they won't be the only car manufacturer cranking out electric vehicles--but that's assuming the world is moving toward that, which I think it is.Tesla is losing by increasing too slow the production. And if they continue like this, at some point their production will become too big and no longer much demand.
Once Honda, Ford, Toyota, Volkswagen, and the other car makers and their subsidiaries start producing e-vehicles, Tesla will have lost any edge it had, and it'll be just one car maker among many, making variations on a theme. They were one of the most innovative companies for quite a while, but that doesn't mean they're going to remain on top forever. They're not going to, IMO.
I think there is a chance Elon Musk could step down as tesla CEO. The way that Jeff Bezos recently stepped down as amazon CEO. Elon Musk recently stated on twitter he hates being the CEO boss.
That could very well be the case, especially if Musk keeps pursuing things other than the success of Tesla. Stockholders and the company's board of directors might not appreciate a CEO that doesn't have his eye on the ball. 
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
I am sure Tesla sensed and factored in such challenges in their future plans. Usually a company as big as Tesla, have their next 20 years plan ready with many contingency avenues available. Also Tesla is born electric but other car markers will have to spend a ton of money and time to transition from fossil fuel to fully electric. Possibly these other car markers will prefer to license technologies from Tesla instead of reinventing the wheel. That will be easier and cost effective for them. So I can only see advantages for Tesla as a whole.
The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
One of tesla's announced future strategies is licensing its EV technology to other automakers.
Similar to how nintendo earned extra revenue by licensing its cartridge technology to game developers.
Which could mean tesla is positioned to license and supply components to EV automakers in europe.
My guess is tesla and china will emerge as two main suppliers for EV tech in 2022 and beyond.
China has advantages in owning a stake in a high percentage of rare earth mineral rights. Tesla has an advantage in developing tabless batteries and other claimed improvements over existing EV tech.
I think there is a chance Elon Musk could step down as tesla CEO. The way that Jeff Bezos recently stepped down as amazon CEO. Elon Musk recently stated on twitter he hates being the CEO boss.
The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
This was far from unexpected. It was always something like "when", not "if".
Tesla is losing by increasing too slow the production. And if they continue like this, at some point their production will become too big and no longer much demand.
For now, however, they're still on safe side. There's plenty of market yet for Tesla. If they'll have a breakthrough in the research/development in batteries, they'll keep an edge for longer. But the competition is getting near.
A significant part of the European Recovery Funds will be channelled towards reducing the carbon emissions. This will include solar energy investments, other renewables but also public investments in car maker´s factories to prepare the massive introduction of the electric cars. One of the key selling points of Tesla stocks is the fact that it was born electric and does not have to spend money transitioning as opposed to all major car maker´s. The fact that Europe will publicly subsidize these changes means that Tesla will no longer have that competitive advantage and that one of it´s moats will be gone in 5 years.
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Hi Elon: "Say Dooooge"
Jump to: