Seems that marlboroza already tagged them. I think it's in the "strong circumstantial" category so I'll pass.
He must have seen this thread - I hadn't noticed.
Locking.
Topic: Group of likely alt accounts promoting scams (Read 221 times)
He must have seen this thread - I hadn't noticed.
Locking.
What do we think? Is this enough evidence to tag these accounts?
Seems that marlboroza already tagged them. I think it's in the "strong circumstantial" category so I'll pass.
I dunno why anyone shudn't tag and put the onus on them for these activities.
So why haven't you? Too busy spamming your signature?
I dunno why anyone shudn't tag and put the onus on them for these activities.
Obviously they are in it together, quite possibly alts.
Obviously they are in it together, quite possibly alts.
So, after we busted bataoucheusma for his fake ICO (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/icotwecrypto-fake-team-5024437), he suddenly got 3 positive trusts left to him in the same day, from users hardcod3r, bithashx, and meegaa.
All three of these accounts were bumping this scam with an hour or two of it being posted, as you can see here (Archive: https://archive.is/PmL3C):
Looking back at their previous posts, bithashx posted an ICO for a project called "Bithash" here, which now has a dead website, twitter, telegram and Eth address - another likely scam. Three of these users show up again within minutes of each other to bump the topic as you can see here (Archive: https://archive.is/y5Dhp):
There is also another account bithashp with obviously a very similar name, that was created, made no posts, left bataoucheusma positive trust, and then was never active again.
What do we think? Is this enough evidence to tag these accounts?
All three of these accounts were bumping this scam with an hour or two of it being posted, as you can see here (Archive: https://archive.is/PmL3C):
Looking back at their previous posts, bithashx posted an ICO for a project called "Bithash" here, which now has a dead website, twitter, telegram and Eth address - another likely scam. Three of these users show up again within minutes of each other to bump the topic as you can see here (Archive: https://archive.is/y5Dhp):
There is also another account bithashp with obviously a very similar name, that was created, made no posts, left bataoucheusma positive trust, and then was never active again.
What do we think? Is this enough evidence to tag these accounts?
Jump to: