Indeed. Rappoport writes about that here: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/the-story-the-washington-post-wont-print/
So what’s the real bottom-line op here?
It’s all about keeping the NSA story alive, in order that people know they’re being spied on 24/7. That’s the social engineering aspect. That’s the game.
And in that regard, the slow-drip method of releasing Snowden files is quite useful. It appears to be a smart journalistic strategy, to “keep the issue before the public so that a true debate about government secrecy and spying can take place.”
But the debate isn’t effective. The NSA isn’t being curbed. If one of its channels of snooping is cut back, another one will emerge.
No, the actual op is: keep reminding people they’re being spied on; that will make them more cautious; that will make make them conform in action, speech, and thought.
Also: Check out what Rappoport says about the NSA spying on financial institutions and other companies, to gain trading advantages. Very interesting stuff. It's already well-documented (even by the MSM) that NSA has access to anyone's bank accounts and can manipulate the balances at will. It's also documented that they have been spying (or at least planned to spy) on IMF and various corporations.