Okay. The OP linked to a page which was all about timing attacks and how nodes used their time to verify blocks, and how to skew that. Then he suggested doing it while a fork was in progress.
Which would accomplish absolutely nothing. It's a bag of facts with no purpose, this was why I said the moon wasn't made of cheese. You are not a llama, so where is my million dollars? One thing does not follow from the others. A bunch of truthful preconditions doesn't make the following text sensible.Quote
Then you said that this was confused, and said that node times were only used in "what it puts in it's own blocks", which wasn't correct (as you just agreed), which I then pointed out.
No, my response was in context. For the purpose of the hard fork rule a node's time is irrelevant except for what it puts in its own blocks. The hard fork rule is evaluated only based on the data in the chain ("blocks with timestamps I see. You were referring to the hard fork rule and not to the linked page.
I misunderstood, sorry.
. Hax!" and perhaps you'll see why?