Author

Topic: HARD TO FIND STATS FOR FOLKS WHO DON"T NEED EFFICENCY>!! (Read 87 times)

newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
that all being said i did listen and i do appreciat the advice. ive been researching the S9 since last night
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
i mean it seems like a typical ethernet plug needing miner
i need it to be wifi compatible and retard  DO NOT POST SESC LINKS
i read that theres some adapter but havent figured it out yet

edit:is it allowed in the rules of this site to arrange to have someone put miners in my place for a percentage?
i get power essentially for free for at the very least the next 3 years and i feel like theres opportunity here.
all legal too.

double edit: how bad of an idea would it be to buy 2 two MINIDOGE miners from goldshell?
Id go with the KD5 if i could get it for 8k but the thing is i dont trust that coin to be around forever whereas IMO LTC has proven itself to at the very least remain relevant/liquid.
legendary
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7849
'The right to privacy matters'
I have been interested in getting into mining but have been kept at bay by the usual overhead costs and also my lack of technical knowledge.

Because i also only use wifi i decided to go with FUTUREBIT and the moonlander2 devices at first just to get my feet wet.
Well, so far the returns have been decent and i think i can actually make a profit after a few years.

i also ordered one of his APOLLO BTC miners. the full rig. im thinking of adding on a hashboard but then i decided to come here and finally get this question answered.

What is the strongest miner for the cheapest price COMPLETELY DISREGARDING EFFICENCY.

As, someone who DOES NOT pay for their electricity i don't necessarily need the device to get the most bang for its buck as far as power consumption, i only need it to have very high hashrate relative to its UPFRONT cost.

Obviously, as futurebit seems to be marketed for its ability to deliver decent hashrate with minimal electricity consumption, it would seem to be the OPPOSITE of what im looking for but its wifi compatability and simplicity to use made it appealing nonetheless.


With about 4 grand left in Dry powder(fiat), i want to see how much Hash power i can get thats is
A)wifi compatible
B)Scrypt or SHa256
C)tech-illiterate friendly.

On the off chance that JSTEPH reads this, could you theorectically make a super powered and cheap to produce miner if the need to make it "efficent" was removed?
perhaps a unit aimed at folks who are fortunate enough to get free power?

S9's
are the way to go.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
I have been interested in getting into mining but have been kept at bay by the usual overhead costs and also my lack of technical knowledge.

Because i also only use wifi i decided to go with FUTUREBIT and the moonlander2 devices at first just to get my feet wet.
Well, so far the returns have been decent and i think i can actually make a profit after a few years.

i also ordered one of his APOLLO BTC miners. the full rig. im thinking of adding on a hashboard but then i decided to come here and finally get this question answered.

What is the strongest miner for the cheapest price COMPLETELY DISREGARDING EFFICENCY.

As, someone who DOES NOT pay for their electricity i don't necessarily need the device to get the most bang for its buck as far as power consumption, i only need it to have very high hashrate relative to its UPFRONT cost.

Obviously, as futurebit seems to be marketed for its ability to deliver decent hashrate with minimal electricity consumption, it would seem to be the OPPOSITE of what im looking for but its wifi compatability and simplicity to use made it appealing nonetheless.


With about 4 grand left in Dry powder(fiat), i want to see how much Hash power i can get thats is
A)wifi compatible
B)Scrypt or SHa256
C)tech-illiterate friendly.

On the off chance that JSTEPH reads this, could you theorectically make a super powered and cheap to produce miner if the need to make it "efficent" was removed?
perhaps a unit aimed at folks who are fortunate enough to get free power?
Jump to: