Topic: Has anyone seen the Weiss cryptocoin ratings? (Read 118 times)
This is a joke, lack of knowledge about the space shows very much in this rating, there is none of these assets that deserves B-, EOS is giving B with no real product and the funny thing is that it was giving the same rating with Ethereum on which the token is listed for now
@mobomofo. Your top coins are supposed to be only C- and Ds. Besides having no use in the real world, some of them do not have a working and secure blockchain yet. Some of them also uses Proof of Stake which is not as secure as Proof of Work. they should be Cs at the very best.
I found a PDF earlier today.. ill take some screenshots and post them.. one sec.
As for the grading, im not sure what criteria they used to base their analysis' on. Premise? Execution? Uniqueness? Not sure there are alot of variables and im not really taking any of it with a grain of salt..
EDIT:
https://imgur.com/gallery/H8KKX
As for the grading, im not sure what criteria they used to base their analysis' on. Premise? Execution? Uniqueness? Not sure there are alot of variables and im not really taking any of it with a grain of salt..
EDIT:
https://imgur.com/gallery/H8KKX
Honestly all of the B's are my top coins. They are OS's not Dapps. I'm all in on EOS right now, and if I was spread out I would be in ETH (most usable of the old guard) and NEO, XLM, ADA (fast new blood). The only one missing is QTUM. For what its worth Ive been mining in this game since BTC was $1...but what do I know. YMMV
And to the OP - Both EOS and ADA are blockchains. ADA is a 3rd gen platform and EOS is building a lightning fast 100k transactions per 500ms blockchain (though currently in ICO you are issued ERC20 place holder tokens, but they are tied to your EOS wallet and recorded equally on genesis block June 1-3rd).
Steemit is the only one I would say might not fit the B rating...then again its part of the block.one/Dan Larimer stew (EOS)
I found a PDF earlier today.. ill take some screenshots and post them.. one sec.
As for the grading, im not sure what criteria they used to base their analysis' on. Premise? Execution? Uniqueness? Not sure there are alot of variables and im not really taking any of it with a grain of salt..
EDIT:
https://imgur.com/gallery/H8KKX
As for the grading, im not sure what criteria they used to base their analysis' on. Premise? Execution? Uniqueness? Not sure there are alot of variables and im not really taking any of it with a grain of salt..
EDIT:
https://imgur.com/gallery/H8KKX
A friend of mine saw it and he told me that the ratings were biased or that the people behind it have never thoroughly studied the cryptospace. Also, the ratings looked like random letter grades were attached to each coin.
Cardano and EOS, both of which do not have their own blockchains were graded a B, while bitcoin and Monero were graded as C. Do you agree?
If some of you have already seen them, please post it.
Cardano and EOS, both of which do not have their own blockchains were graded a B, while bitcoin and Monero were graded as C. Do you agree?
If some of you have already seen them, please post it.
Jump to: