Topic: "Hashocracy" and other political definitions of bitcoin's governance structure (Read 461 times)
March 09, 2016, 09:26:38 AM
I completely agree withg your vision of Hashocracy. Bitcoin is becoming increasingly centralized by big corportaions that have a lot of mining power, and those are the ones who control the network...
March 09, 2016, 09:19:46 AM
You can try doing it, but who is going to rule?
um
the blockchain?
I thought that was the whole point, no?
March 09, 2016, 09:04:43 AM
its going to have to start with people lobbying their local and national politicians and trying to get them on board.
March 09, 2016, 08:31:32 AM
You can try doing it, but who is going to rule?
March 09, 2016, 08:03:50 AM
The 2016 election season brings monumental change.
America needs to recognize how bitcoin can help remove corruption from politics.
We need accurate terms that cut to the heart of what bitcoin is and how it can root out government corruption.
"Hashocracy" seems to be the front runner for a single word that accurately describes bitcoin's political process, and the corruption resistant benefits it offers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQGlcLFhwE0#t=19s
So the question I am proposing to the American people is this:
What is the governmental structure of bitcoin called.
If you want Americans to utilize bitcoin in their daily lives, then you must campaign and explain, which is difficult but rewarding at the same time.
Let's eliminate corruption and make America great again, by injecting Hashocracy into our political process.
http://cointelegraph.com/images/725_aHR0cDovL2NvaW50ZWxlZ3JhcGguY29tL3N0b3JhZ2UvdXBsb2Fkcy92aWV3LzJlOTgwMzIxNThmNDc0OWEyZGM5Y2E4MTZhNmM0MjEzLnBuZw==.jpg
Jump to: