hashrate = 14.5thash/sec, price = $4.22

RyNinDaCleM

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1009

Legen -wait for it- dary

Quote from: eldentyrell on February 18, 2012, 02:07:56 PM

Quote from: RyNinDaCleM on February 18, 2012, 02:02:18 PM

Looks like 10TH to me. Difficulty just changed too. So there is a couple days of wild estimates on network hashrate.

Best explanation yet. I was just going by the number in the corner of the screen at bitcoincharts.com.

I've always found their estimate to be quite a bit higher than the Bitcoinwatch.com one.

the joint

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1020

Ok, makes sense. But there seriously have been very few slow blocks all day at Deepbit. I'd say just by simply looking at the rate at which blocks are being solved its obvious that more hardware is being used today.

It was enough to make me change my Deepbit address for the first time in a while.

gusti

legendary

Activity: 1099

Merit: 1000

Quote from: the joint on February 18, 2012, 02:16:13 PM

Interesting, I was just about to make a thread about this.

So, Bitcoinwatch and Bitcoincharts simply reflect the "hashrate" according to how many blocks are actually solved, and not how much computational power is actually there?

That seems a little weird to me. Definite patterns emerge on the graph at Bitcoinwatch, and it seems hard to believe that simple variance creates these patterns.

For what I understand (I may be wrong) there is no way to measure hashrate.
Only reflect it as a calculation of difficulty and solved blocks in a certain period.

Mushoz

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Bitbuy

Quote from: the joint on February 18, 2012, 02:16:13 PM

Interesting, I was just about to make a thread about this.

So, Bitcoinwatch and Bitcoincharts simply reflect the "hashrate" according to how many blocks are actually solved, and not how much computational power is actually there?

That seems a little weird to me. Definite patterns emerge on the graph at Bitcoinwatch, and it seems hard to believe that simple variance creates these patterns.

There is no direct way of measuring the hashrate of the network. The only thing possible is to guess the network's hashrate by looking at how fast blocks are getting solved, and what the current difficulty is.

the joint

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1020

Interesting, I was just about to make a thread about this.

So, Bitcoinwatch and Bitcoincharts simply reflect the "hashrate" according to how many blocks are actually solved, and not how much computational power is actually there?

That seems a little weird to me. Definite patterns emerge on the graph at Bitcoinwatch, and it seems hard to believe that simple variance creates these patterns.

eldentyrell

donator

Activity: 980

Merit: 1004

felonious vagrancy, personified

Quote from: RyNinDaCleM on February 18, 2012, 02:02:18 PM

Looks like 10TH to me. Difficulty just changed too. So there is a couple days of wild estimates on network hashrate.

Best explanation yet. I was just going by the number in the corner of the screen at bitcoincharts.com.

notme

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1002

I think he might have been misreading at the difficulty numbers.

RyNinDaCleM

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1009

Legen -wait for it- dary

I don't see it! Undecided

Looks like 10TH to me. Difficulty just changed too. So there is a couple days of wild estimates on network hashrate.

Quote from: mcorlett on February 18, 2012, 01:53:22 PM

It's probably just the bump in mining investments resulting from the price bump in January.

This too.
Look at the high in the end of August '11, It's nearly three full months after the $32 high.

copumpkin

donator

Activity: 266

Merit: 252

I'm actually a pineapple

Quote from: eldentyrell on February 18, 2012, 01:49:51 PM

Anybody got an explanation for this?

Sure: the numbers are mostly uncorrelated.

gusti

legendary

Activity: 1099

Merit: 1000

Network hashrate is calculated upon the number of blocks discovered, not measured.
Transient peaks may reflect variance regarding luck.

notme

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1002

Bitcoin never closed a week above $20, so price was never really "in the high $20s" for an amount of time that can effect mining power.

mcorlett

donator

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

It's probably just the bump in mining investments resulting from the price bump in January.

eldentyrell

donator

Activity: 980

Merit: 1004

felonious vagrancy, personified

Anybody got an explanation for this?

The last time the network hashrate broke 14thash/sec the price was up in the high $20's.

Topic: hashrate = 14.5thash/sec, price = $4.22 (Read 1811 times)