Topic: Hat sich Satoshi Nakamoto gerade ge-outed? (Read 194 times)
na ya....das ist geil
Ich habe diesen stümperhaften Mist schon in einem anderen Thread auseinandergenommen und widerlegt...
Was ist so schwer daran, Mathematk als Wahrheit zu betrachten? Prüfe dazu folgendes:
1. How many alpha-numeric hash combinations are there in sha-256
2. How many md6-256 alpha-numeric combinations are there.
3. How unique are the hashes presented by hashing " v0.1 " in both sha-256/md6-256
4. What are the vectors of conversion between both hashes
5. How difficult is it to produce a random "five string letter" vanity address
6. How does this difficulty rise substantially when limited within the scope of only being allowed to manipulate 2 alphanumeric characters within hashing a random word?
7. How many two alpha numeric character combination changes are possible within a sha-256/md6-256 hash?
Wer sich wirklich damit auskennt (nicht nur Halbwissen), wird es akzeptieren.
Warum?
Weil derjenige, der das Bitcoin Whitepaper geschrieben und die Newsgroup-/Forenbeiträge verfasst hat, mit ziemlicher Sicherheit nicht in Indonesien gelebt hat.
Woran machst Du das fest? Was, wenn er Amerikaner ist, der viele Jahre in Japan gelebt hat, und heute auf Bali lebt?
es sind doch alles nur Spekulationen, 10 Personen = 10 Versionen
und solange NSA nicht offiziell verkündet so lange werden wir nichts wissen
Warum?
Weil derjenige, der das Bitcoin Whitepaper geschrieben und die Newsgroup-/Forenbeiträge verfasst hat, mit ziemlicher Sicherheit nicht in Indonesien gelebt hat.
Woran machst Du das fest? Was, wenn er Amerikaner ist, der viele Jahre in Japan gelebt hat, und heute auf Bali lebt?
Warum?
Weil derjenige, der das Bitcoin Whitepaper geschrieben und die Newsgroup-/Forenbeiträge verfasst hat, mit ziemlicher Sicherheit nicht in Indonesien gelebt hat.
Warum?
This was posted on pastebin today:
"What I'm going to present is better evidence of who I am than access to mere private keys (which can be stolen). And it's definitely more convincing than what was ever offered by CSW.
The point here is to demonstrate superior understanding of Bitcoin encryption. I will manipulate the first and last digit of a hash (md6-256) that's not native to Bitcoin, to produce a vanity address ON BITCOIN that coincides with the signed statement.
The original hash, before being manipulated, will be derived from " v0.1 ", the first version of Bitcoin.
To recognize the significance of this, you will need to bring your attention to the similarities in the two hashes.
"v0.1" was the first version of Bitcoin. It was hashed in md6-256 which is not sha-256. Slightly modified it exposes a hidden vanity address that starts out with "1MyFun".
1MyFun5vPzSgAhCQLuFrRz11213RcrK8M5
----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----
Creating Bitcoin Was All About "My Fun".
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----
----BEGIN SIGNATURE----
HA5V2RstFymbo4Z1/dSi/4VVYDG3T8svnlAEOriUdCOwLs2ivkOnJ03rKlxqSapfjCS2duuLH+Korm7+3K9HxAI=
----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----
Private Hexidecimal Key
1C04E262DCAF32C396EC666AAD9A53D97464572E71C0748EA29205B41ACC2561
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bitcoin v0.1 Alpha Release
" v0.1" (md6-256)
4C04E262DCAF32C396EC666AAD9A53D97464572E71C0748EA29205B41ACC2566
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The odds of anyone being able to manipulate the first and last digits of any hash relating to the first version of Bitcoin to reveal a hidden vanity address are about 10 trillion to 1.
Not accepting this as undeniable proof means you don't understand the statistical probability ratios involved with knowing where to look and what to change.
Greedy and uneducated people are only interested in ‘where the money is’ (access to keys) instead of real cryptographic evidence.
NOTE: Do not attempt to add these private keys to your wallet.
PS: I live in Bali, Indonesia."
"What I'm going to present is better evidence of who I am than access to mere private keys (which can be stolen). And it's definitely more convincing than what was ever offered by CSW.
The point here is to demonstrate superior understanding of Bitcoin encryption. I will manipulate the first and last digit of a hash (md6-256) that's not native to Bitcoin, to produce a vanity address ON BITCOIN that coincides with the signed statement.
The original hash, before being manipulated, will be derived from " v0.1 ", the first version of Bitcoin.
To recognize the significance of this, you will need to bring your attention to the similarities in the two hashes.
"v0.1" was the first version of Bitcoin. It was hashed in md6-256 which is not sha-256. Slightly modified it exposes a hidden vanity address that starts out with "1MyFun".
1MyFun5vPzSgAhCQLuFrRz11213RcrK8M5
----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----
Creating Bitcoin Was All About "My Fun".
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----
----BEGIN SIGNATURE----
HA5V2RstFymbo4Z1/dSi/4VVYDG3T8svnlAEOriUdCOwLs2ivkOnJ03rKlxqSapfjCS2duuLH+Korm7+3K9HxAI=
----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----
Private Hexidecimal Key
1C04E262DCAF32C396EC666AAD9A53D97464572E71C0748EA29205B41ACC2561
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bitcoin v0.1 Alpha Release
" v0.1" (md6-256)
4C04E262DCAF32C396EC666AAD9A53D97464572E71C0748EA29205B41ACC2566
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The odds of anyone being able to manipulate the first and last digits of any hash relating to the first version of Bitcoin to reveal a hidden vanity address are about 10 trillion to 1.
Not accepting this as undeniable proof means you don't understand the statistical probability ratios involved with knowing where to look and what to change.
Greedy and uneducated people are only interested in ‘where the money is’ (access to keys) instead of real cryptographic evidence.
NOTE: Do not attempt to add these private keys to your wallet.
PS: I live in Bali, Indonesia."
Jump to: