In contrast, I guess there must be more number of people are offering themselves for managing campaigns than the total number of currently running campaigns (with BTC payments). What is exactly missing here?
I guess simply opening a topic in services section for mentioning about experience on various activities of this forum along with available time zone and contact methods with high graphics may not land them into managing a campaign always. I am afraid most manager-aspirants are stopping and waiting with a topic. I believe one more step is definitely missing out there. Let us discuss on that.
The whole point of your subject is based on guesses, this is why you focus only on signature campaign management without referring that it's a branch from Community Management, and not that much important to focus on separetly.
I don't also think that there must be more number of users offering sig campaign management as we already have a lot of active managers satisfying the whole market in its actual conditions .
This doesn't deny that we can open this subject for discussion but not based on your guesses. Maybe you have to provide more convincible arguments .
How few veteran managers are able to launch campaigns consistently?
1. I guess they must be contacting new devs and business people through one of possible means (PM of this forum, support email from their site, DM in twitter, Telegarm and discord and etc).
2. They must be taking time to convince devs and business people about the importance of having campaigns or at least emphasizing to try a trail campaign to study the leads originated from this forum.
3. They must be frequently contacting back to the OLD such business people about re-launching campaigns.
4. They must have flex rates for every business types and projects.
5. They must be having good marketing skills before setting up themselves as an experienced manager on this forum.
Must01: It's definetely the opposite. Managers of sig campaigns are not project advisors. Business people and devs have to contact available managers if they think their projects need to be promoted within bitcointalk community, and this is not necessary as many projects have their own community managers so no need to hire someone.
Must02: Managers are not responsible to convince any project about the reliability of sig campaigns unless they are already members in team project. This doesn't mean they can't open discussions about this but not to attract more services to use this method of promotion. Note that sig campaigns weren't all successful and many projects suspended their campaigns after not getting the intended result.
Must03: Same as must01 and must02 .
Must04: Of course they have. But this is not fundamental for any CM because we don't really know the exact rates applied by each one of them and how the rates are calculated. Any manager can work with a fixed rate if he is satisfied with the type of projects he choose to manage but this may vary depends on duration of the sig campaign and number of accepted participants.
Must05: They must have an updated portofolio and a good reputation among the community. That's enough as a start.