It's more like, too patriotic to accept a bunch of hogwash without courtroom real proof. In this case, because of its far-reaching effects, it should be a whole lot of courtroom proof via a whole lot of courtrooms.
So Covid-19 exists only when a bunch of inbreds agree that it does in some small-town courtroom in rural Arizona?
Are you sure you are not related to Vernon Howell?
What would convince you that Covid-19 exists and it is a real virus that damages lungs in infected mammals?
Actually, Covid-19 exists only when it exists. The existence of it isn't the point.
If your buddy whispered in your ear that Covid-19 is killing the world, would you believe it? Or would it take a bunch of media, government, and doctor hype to convince you? Because that's all there is to Covid-19 regarding the pandemic... media, government, and doctor hype.
Get it into a courtroom in standard expert attorney-like debate, and with expert CV science witnesses and experimenters, showing and proving what Covid-19 is doing and what it is not doing. So far all we have is hearsay. You can tell by all the hearsay coming out of the woodwork against the official CV danger hearsay.
How in the world dense are you, anyway? You believe one batch of hearsay over another batch of hearsay, and you don't even what proof of what is real.
Turn on the TV, listen to what the experts are saying, check their credentials. Listen to the scientists who are working on solutions to this problem. Listen to them not your right-wing nuts in your compound basement chapel.