I created a low-supply coin and did not do any kind of ICO with bonuses, bounty, airdrop, to preserve the value of the coin, and not have those hundreds of people selling the coin and dropping its price, how would you indicate being disclosing the currency and website that look at the quality of a currency and the project?
Anyone can make a copy & paste coin.
"Preserving it" doesn't add any value at all, if anything it makes it even more worthless. (As copy & paste projects are already worthless.)
A coin, or currency, only has value due to people putting their money into it, either to use if or because they believe it will go up even more.
People only do that because they see a future in the currency, either because it has a lot of features, or partnerships w/e.
no one ever got interested in a copy pasta coin due to it being "preserved"...
..
thank you for commenting friend, in case I've been working, the interests of an investor, first I collected 86 respondents on that topic and put the main concerns of the same in practice:
- High allocation of coins for bounty hunters.
- ICO Bonus.
- High Referral Bonus.
- Max. Supply.
- High use of coins in marketing.
- High allocation of currencies for development team.
- Lack of updating the community.
- Solid concept, proven design utility.
- Lack of differentiated, unique project.
- Lack of communication between the project and its investors.
- Turnovers that generate token profit.
- Token listing, prior to release of final product.
within these information there are many porques, modestly you can analyze the XRP currency (RIPPLE), I believe that the currency is the one with the largest market partners, but as you can see its price never reaches great values and one of the reasons for this are its high supply, that's why these details are so important
